INTELLIBOT vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

Inflectra and ServiceNow are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Inflectra is ranked #31 with an average rating of 4.0, while ServiceNow is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0. Inflectra holds a 0.1% mindshare in RPA, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

67 Views
38 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

INTELLIBOT

Read 7 INTELLIBOT reviews

521 Views
197 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

INTELLIBOT

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and INTELLIBOT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed INTELLIBOT vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. Inflectra Rapise

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

31st

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (24th)

INTELLIBOT

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

17th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of INTELLIBOT is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Asvinth Saravanan

Technical Project Manager at Standard Chartered Bank

Has limited functionality, logging uses extensive resources; automation replay is great

This solution is not very user-friendly and I would not recommend it for robotic platforms. It has limited functionality and the logging takes over 1,000 GB. As a result, each year we need to increase the size of the database and create a workaround by archiving logs. It impacts performance and is a significant pain point for us. The logging is not user-friendly from an architect's perspective. The reporting is a mess in INTELLIBOT, even the developers are struggling to identify the issues and there are also problems when there are two cases hitting the queue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."

"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."

"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."

"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."

"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."

"There's a helpful community available through the portal."

"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."

"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."

"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."

"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."

"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."

"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."

"The trigger actions need to be more robust."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"INTELLIBOT with the DPA costs approximately $1,500 USD."

"It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year."

"The solution requires a license and we purchased one annually. We were satisfied with the price."

"At the time, one license was $5,000 USD. If we needed to negotiate for more licenses, we could negotiate a bit on the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

30%

Government

17%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

29%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

What do you like most about INTELLIBOT?

The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for INTELLIBOT?

It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with INTELLIBOT?

Exception handling activities within INTELLIBOT need to improve. While working with the platform, there were instances where the bot went to a different flow than intended, even when it was suppose...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

UiPath vs INTELLIBOT

Compared 100% of the time

More INTELLIBOT Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

November 2024

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT

November 2024

Download INTELLIBOT product report

Also Known As

Rapise

No data available

Learn More

Inflectra

ServiceNow

Overview

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Intellibot is a powerful RPA Platform that is designed to simplify the lifecycle of RPA deployments at every step of the process. Speed, reliability, ease of use and extensibility are at the heart of the platform architecture. Intellibot incorporates many next generation features that enable it to deliver on even the most complex RPA projects.

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. Inflectra Rapise

October 2024

Free Report: INTELLIBOT vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about INTELLIBOT vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our INTELLIBOT vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.