OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Inflectra SpiraTest are both leading solutions in application lifecycle management and quality assurance. User data indicates Inflectra SpiraTest often has an edge in features, making it preferred by many despite higher costs.
Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center is valued for its comprehensive test management capabilities, robustness, and extensive functionality. Inflectra SpiraTest stands out for its intuitive design, seamless integration with various platforms and tools, and efficient project management features.
Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM / Quality Center could improve its reporting module, create more intuitive navigation, and enhance its user experience. Inflectra SpiraTest users suggest enhancing automation, increasing flexibility in custom reporting, and expanding its functional depth.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying OpenText ALM / Quality Center can be complex and time-consuming, though it often receives positive ratings for customer service. Inflectra SpiraTest offers a smoother, faster deployment process, but has mixed reviews on customer support, with some users reporting delayed responses.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM / Quality Center has a higher initial setup cost, but users feel the ROI justifies the expense due to its extensive features. Inflectra SpiraTest is more cost-effective initially and delivers good ROI, balancing its higher price point with superior functionality.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
