Infor M3 vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Infor and Oracle are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. Infor holds a 4.6% mindshare in ERP, compared to Oracle’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infor M3

Read 13 Infor M3 reviews

3,896 Views
3,009 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 60 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

3,362 Views
2,770 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Infor M3

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Infor M3 both compete in the ERP category, focusing on various enterprise solutions. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne holds an advantage in terms of comprehensive features and customization capabilities, while Infor M3 is noted for its industry-specific applications.

Features: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers comprehensive warehouse and inventory management, integration with mobile apps, and cloud-based options. It supports diverse business processes with a user-friendly interface. Infor M3 is recognized for its core functionalities in finance, manufacturing, and procurement, though it requires additional third-party tools for specialized needs. Both platforms offer robust options, but JD Edwards stands out for eliminating the need for middleware and extensive customization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne needs to enhance industry-specific modules and simplify setup and reporting processes. Error handling and user training are also areas needing attention. Infor M3 struggles with integration and requires improved training resources, client support, and more user-centric dashboards. The complex procurement and supply chain modules could benefit from simplification and better eCommerce support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports mainly on-premises deployment with hybrid cloud options, and its technical support receives mixed reviews. Infor M3 offers both on-premises and public cloud deployment, with generally positive technical support feedback. Oracle focuses heavily on cloud solutions for JD Edwards, and both products would improve with more streamlined deployment processes.

Pricing and ROI: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a high-cost option for medium to large enterprises, with a complex but competitive licensing compared to SAP. Infor M3 targets similar organizations but is priced more affordably than SAP and costlier than Dynamics 365. Both provide good ROI, with noted financial benefits and stability, though initial investments can be substantial.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

12th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

8th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Production Planning (1st), Demand Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor M3 is 4.6%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 3.2%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Pravinkumar Bhandare

Principal Consultant - Infor M3 at Merino Consulting Services

The solution is a reliable, stable, and cost-saving ERP

Different countries have different finance practices, but I believe they need to fine-tune their practices to match industry standards. Practices vary from country to country, for example, in India, it is different than in the US. Sometimes, clients require alternate processes that are not standard, but they claim that these are the standard practices in their industry. At those times, we feel that the option required is not available with the solution. This is not the case only for Infor M3. Other ERPs also have the same problem. We can't mold the ERP to fit the customer's requirements. There are some standards in place because many screens and programs are integrated into the finance process. We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements. The customer needs specific screens for different users, so if that program is in place, we have one planning tool in Infor M3. Planners need to know all things related to manufacturing, purchase, and sales in order to make decisions about planning. In one of my clients, I came across the requirement that they were asking for user authority in the planning tool. This is not the case though, because all planners need to know all things. However, on the manufacturing side, we can say that the person who is working with machine operations only needs to know machine-related information and doesn't need knowledge of products or sales. That standard industry is available, so we can give access to the user as per their needs. If the maintenance people are there, we can give them limited access, but if the planner is there, we need to give them all access according to industry standards. However, this requirement from the client side is not possible with the standard Infor software, but Infor can consider implementing it if the need is larger for many customers.

Read full review

Sydney Chidambaram

Senior JD Edwards Functional Consultant at Critical Data Management (Pty) Ltd

Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations

They need to improve the planning section of Enterprise One. They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days. There need to be proper error codes. The red alerts need to be explained a bit better. Te yellow alerts are fine. The product planning feature need improvement. There needs to be more functional. The sales forecasting needs to be improved. It is expensive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Infor comes up with different tools every year, and they are all compatible with Infor M3, which makes it a more reliable and trustworthy tool. The integration is very smooth."

"The user interface and user experience were good."

"It's very stable, and it handles all types of industrial and manufacturing businesses in very good ways. I've found it to be easy."

"Infor M3 has tailor-made packages for each and every industry."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."

"The most valuable feature of Infor M3 is the level of detail it has about the different manufacturing processes compared to other ERP solutions. Other ERP solutions provide the same level of integration as Infor M3, but Infor M3 specializes in several functions, such as planning and manufacturing."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to cover different types of activities, and the requirement for maintenance and data is very low."

More Infor M3 pros

"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."

"It’s a stable product."

"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."

"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."

"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."

"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."

"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."

"There are numerous good features."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

Cons

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."

"Its initial setup was probably complex, but it is a very good system."

"We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements."

"The solution must provide more learning documents."

"It should be improved in terms of procurement of the supply chain and business intelligence analysis. We have the Infor BI tool, but it's more complex to use than, for example, Power Pivot or QlikView in the market."

"I would like to have some kind of dashboard to show an overview of different data on the same dashboard or on the same screen instead of moving to BI."

"It would be great if Infor added some new workflows in the finance module. I'd also like to see better integration with third-party applications."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

More Infor M3 cons

"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."

"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."

"The only issue I see is Oracle's lack of focus on the product. When the sales team calls us, they try to promote OCI more than JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. They don't even talk about it. I feel there's no focus from Oracle Corporation themselves. The salespeople either don't know about it or don't talk about it. When they have something new, they only talk about EBS or OCI. This gives a feeling that there's no interest from Oracle. We don't see much new functionality being released or announced in the roadmap."

"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."

"There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."

"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."

"Lacking in certain areas of support."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a lot of value for the money. The implementation cost and license cost are quite reasonable compared to other solutions, such as Oracle EBS or SAP."

"Upgrading projects can make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne costlier, so it needs cost reduction in this area."

"The solution's pricing depends on the deal and the number of users."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."

"The solution’s pricing depends on the module you’re purchasing."

"It's very competitively priced. The only problem now is that most of the industry is moving towards software as a service or a subscription model, whereas JD Edwards has a capital expenditure. You would spend on the licenses once off. You can either host it on-premise or in the cloud, but there is a licensing fee once a year."

"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."

"The solution is really expensive."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

I haven't received any complaints from the customers' end related to the product. The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

In my company, I use the tool for back-end data or to control the entries in the back-end database. My company also extracts data, after which it gets pushed to the data lake and data fabric, and t...

See all answers

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

The pricing is average. Over the years, it might increase a little. Generally, it offers a good price.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

Based on my experience, I would recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne to other people. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten, as it can be customized to the company's needs while maintain...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 49% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 20% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 1% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

JD Edwards World vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 15% of the time

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 14% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 12% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 11% of the time

Siemens Tecnomatix Assembly Planning and Validation vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 2% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

December 2024

Download Infor M3 product report

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

December 2024

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Also Known As

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

No data available

Learn More

Infor

Oracle

Overview

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solution developed by Oracle. It is designed to help organizations streamline and automate their business processes, including financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing operations. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, and services.

With JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, organizations can manage their financials, inventory, order management, procurement, and supply chain processes from a single, integrated platform. It also provides real-time visibility into business performance, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and respond quickly to changing market conditions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Features

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Financial management: The solution provides tools for financial management, including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, and fixed assets.

Supply chain management: Its tools for managing the supply chain include procurement, inventory management, and order management.

Manufacturing operations: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports manufacturing operations, including material requirements planning (MRP), capacity planning, and shop floor control.

Real-time visibility: With its real-time visibility into business performance, organizations can make more informed decisions.

Business intelligence: The solution offers business intelligence and reporting capabilities to help organizations gain insight into their operations and make data-driven decisions.

Workflow management: The solution’s workflow management enables organizations to automate and streamline business processes.

Mobile access: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne allows users to access information and perform tasks from anywhere, at any time via mobile access.

Security: It provides a secure platform for protecting sensitive data and ensuring the integrity of business operations.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Increased productivity: With its range of tools and features, the solution supports collaboration and communication, improving productivity and reducing the time required to complete tasks.

Improved business performance: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne helps organizations improve their overall business performance by providing real-time visibility into key performance metrics and enabling data-driven decision-making.

Customization: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries and organizations.

Integration: It integrates with other enterprise applications, including customer relationship management (CRM), human resources (HR), and e-commerce solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are its ability to model, ease of use, customization capabilities, and being able to create reports without coding.

According to PeerSpot user Raymond R., JD Edwards functional consultant manufacturer at Ordina, “The strongest functionality of JD Edwards is the ability to model, in the production that it is, model the production process. If I were to model the bill of materials and production routing, then that's one of the strongest parts of JD Edwards.”

Khalid J., Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C., says, "We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."

In addition, a Project Leader at a tech services company expresses, "With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."

Sample Customers

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

December 2024

Free Report: Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.