Based on my experience, I would recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne to other people. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten, as it can be customized to the company's needs while maintaining best practices.
Financial management in JD Edwards involves various aspects, such as general ledger, accounts payable, and accounts receivable. Localization of finance modules is essential, and I have experience developing features like Turkish financial optimization. It offers multiple interface options, including Windows, web, and mobile. The functionality and features of these interfaces are extensive, and I support improving user experience. It has robust reporting and analytics tools that allow technical consultants and users to develop custom reports and forms, it is a strong tool that is very useful for our clients. Mobile application support is crucial, especially as customers increasingly use mobile devices. It significantly enhances operational efficiency. I highly recommend JD Edwards as it is a robust and reliable ERP solution. I rate it an eight.
I am using the latest version of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. The solution can be deployed both on-premises and on-cloud, but we currently update it from on-premise to cloud. I would recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne to other users. Users should have the right persons and the right team. The solution will not be good for users without a good team, proper key users, and proper process documentation. Overall, I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne ten out of ten.
I am a subject matter expert for finance. People looking to start using JD Edwards should look at the chart of accounts and other basic setups in the finance modules to get an overview of the solution. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
If anyone is looking to use the latest version of this product and if you are comparing it with SAP, and you are fine to spend millions of dollars on the best possible solution, you can go with SAP. However, eventually, EnterpriseOne is going to provide you with the same functionality as SAP at a lower cost as it's ultimately a cheaper solution. When it's boiled down to the ERP system, I would recommend Oracle EOne compared to SAP since you can do lots of customization, and you have lots of other functionalities enabled in the system. You can create an ecosystem around EOne. SAP in contrast, is very standard. You can't make lots of changes based on your enterprise requirements. Therefore, implementing EOne, compared to any other solution at present in the market, is a good choice. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a modern solution.
We are partners. I'd recommend the solution to other users. I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten. It's a great low-code solution that has been well received by the client so far.
I wouldn't recommend EnterpriseOne for small enterprises because the cost-benefit doesn't work out. But for large enterprises, it's a very good and cost-effective solution that's competitive with other products like SAP. I would rate EnterpriseOne nine out of ten.
I am a reseller. I am not a regular user of it, I'm an admin user of it and I am not aware of the application part of it. New users can use the solution as a web implementation of the application and it is a user-friendly application. I’d recommend the product to others. I would rat ether solution eight out of ten.
Global Oracle JDE Practice Head at Tech Mahindra Limited
Real User
2022-06-02T08:04:18Z
Jun 2, 2022
My advice to others is JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is excellent. It has multiple features and business processes of the industry, especially the manufacturing industry, out of the box. There are fewer customizations required. It can meet, 90 to 95 percent of the standard business processes' out-of-box functionality. It is a very good solution from a business point of view. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a nine out of ten.
Software Engineer at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
Real User
2022-05-13T08:03:26Z
May 13, 2022
We are partners with Oracle. If it's a medium or large-scale operation, I'm happy if people go for that ERP. If they want to not spend too much on their solution, like on an SAP or Oracle, this is a good option. I work for bigger clients, they have this product and they are using it for more than 12 or 15 years now and they're really happy and they're big, big, big. Therefore, the customer, if they want, could go for this product first, and if they want to go for EBS or SAP, or any other ERP, they can move over. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Senior Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
Real User
2022-05-04T07:03:49Z
May 4, 2022
My advice to others is they should know the way the world has changed post-pandemic. They should think about cloud solutions so they aren't dependent on hosting it on their premise. Somebody has to be in person available to support this solution. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a nine out of ten.
JD Edwards functional consultant manufacture at Ordina
Real User
2022-04-05T18:59:09Z
Apr 5, 2022
We are a system integrator. I'd advise new users if you are using JD Edwards or if you are using Oracle E-Business Suite, just go on with it and stay using it for a long time. It will be supported until, the last I heard, 2030, by Oracle and perhaps even longer. However, if you are thinking about implementing an ERP solution that's new, from the scratch, I would consider one of the cloud solutions. Then you could look to an Oracle Cloud product or you can look to Salesforce - whatever suits your business. I would go for the cloud products and not for the, well, let's say old school, on-premise products. I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
JDE E1 Technical - Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2022-03-17T14:29:52Z
Mar 17, 2022
Oracle is my company's partner, and JD is an Oracle product. It's a partner to my company, and it's a client partner, but they have a license to a product version, and they also have Oracle support. There is an Oracle support portal; we ask a question, the client asks a question, and the client asks another question. We have had discussions with Oracle about this product. If you purchase this product, you will receive Oracle support for the initial days. When you buy JD Edwards products, the first step that you will need is JD Edwards implementation. For each model that you purchase, you will require the services of some functional experts. When you purchase it as a product, you will be purchasing some models from them. You will require a financial model as well as supply chain models. For each model, you will undoubtedly require supply chain, finance, and consulting. They will be responsible for the product's implementation. I would definitely recommend this solution because I have had a great experience working with this product as a developer. I would rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne an eight out of ten.
Project Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2022-01-12T16:14:47Z
Jan 12, 2022
I find it really good. I have limited exposure to the product, and from my point of view, it is very customizable. It is very good because we can modify the way we want. It is stable as long as we are following Oracle guidelines. I would definitely recommend it to others. I love it. With the new versions, it has become very good. I would rate it a nine out of 10.
ERP Auditor at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-12-27T19:40:08Z
Dec 27, 2021
The deployment is handled through a third party; in which we have a team of consultants. They handle everything, from the setup, to the implementation, to the training. My advice to others is that they use what is available in the system and not attempt to exceed its capacity. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne as a five out of ten.
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-10-25T22:29:53Z
Oct 25, 2021
Make sure that you have the right strategy on whether you're going to support it internally or you're going to hire an external vendor for it. It needs a specialized skill set; it is not something that anyone can just support. I would rate it an eight out of 10. This is based on what I've heard from my customers and people who use other solutions. I haven't worked with too many other products to give a fair comparison.
Help Desk Technician at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-04-05T16:59:29Z
Apr 5, 2021
In terms of financial and distribution, this solution is one of the best. I would recommend this solution to others if they have the money. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne an eight out of ten.
Lead of Business Intelligence at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-01-04T22:04:05Z
Jan 4, 2021
We used to use the Data Access Studio (DAS) to extract data from EnterpriseOne, although we now use Oracle OBIEE for that. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Chief Financial and Operating Officer at Aicrem Square
Real User
2020-09-03T07:49:47Z
Sep 3, 2020
Most of my experience is with on-premises deployments, although I have also worked in an environment where we hosted it on the cloud. If you have a cloud-based deployment then it's managed and maintained by the vendor, although you can still have your own customizations that are unique to the business. The vendor continuously improves this product, basing their changes according to the feedback provided by customers. At this point in time, it is difficult to asks for specific features because they're very compatible with any other system in the market. They are very strong in the manufacturing, construction, and engineering industries. My advice for anybody who is implementing JD Edwards is to make sure that all of your processes are stabilized and standardized. Follow the best practices. Make sure that the processes are not coming from somebody who had good ideas 60 years ago but in reality, are no longer effective. The best thing to do is make sure that the data is clean and you have the blueprints for the business processes according to best practices. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Chief Financial and Operating Officer at Aicrem Square
Real User
2020-08-02T08:16:49Z
Aug 2, 2020
In around 2007, JD Edwards went through a dip and most customers moved to other solutions. Here in South Arica, most government institutions and other clients actually started buying SAP. The company then started doing quite a bit of research and made drastic improvements. Today there are few ERP systems that can actually compete with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. For a long time already, it's been possible to run the solution on any mobile app. I like the fact that there is competition because you need different ERP's that work in certain sectors or certain industries and don't always try to cover everything. For example, there are certain ERP's which are very strong in financial institutions. I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solution developed by Oracle. It is designed to help organizations streamline and automate their business processes, including financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing operations. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, and services.
With JD Edwards...
Based on my experience, I would recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne to other people. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten, as it can be customized to the company's needs while maintaining best practices.
I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Financial management in JD Edwards involves various aspects, such as general ledger, accounts payable, and accounts receivable. Localization of finance modules is essential, and I have experience developing features like Turkish financial optimization. It offers multiple interface options, including Windows, web, and mobile. The functionality and features of these interfaces are extensive, and I support improving user experience. It has robust reporting and analytics tools that allow technical consultants and users to develop custom reports and forms, it is a strong tool that is very useful for our clients. Mobile application support is crucial, especially as customers increasingly use mobile devices. It significantly enhances operational efficiency. I highly recommend JD Edwards as it is a robust and reliable ERP solution. I rate it an eight.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I am using the latest version of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. The solution can be deployed both on-premises and on-cloud, but we currently update it from on-premise to cloud. I would recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne to other users. Users should have the right persons and the right team. The solution will not be good for users without a good team, proper key users, and proper process documentation. Overall, I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne ten out of ten.
I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
I am a subject matter expert for finance. People looking to start using JD Edwards should look at the chart of accounts and other basic setups in the finance modules to get an overview of the solution. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I recommend this solution and rate it 10 out of 10.
I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a nine out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
I would rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a nine out of ten.
If anyone is looking to use the latest version of this product and if you are comparing it with SAP, and you are fine to spend millions of dollars on the best possible solution, you can go with SAP. However, eventually, EnterpriseOne is going to provide you with the same functionality as SAP at a lower cost as it's ultimately a cheaper solution. When it's boiled down to the ERP system, I would recommend Oracle EOne compared to SAP since you can do lots of customization, and you have lots of other functionalities enabled in the system. You can create an ecosystem around EOne. SAP in contrast, is very standard. You can't make lots of changes based on your enterprise requirements. Therefore, implementing EOne, compared to any other solution at present in the market, is a good choice. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a modern solution.
I would advise others t choose a cloud base solution. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a six out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne eight out of ten.
We are partners. I'd recommend the solution to other users. I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten. It's a great low-code solution that has been well received by the client so far.
I wouldn't recommend EnterpriseOne for small enterprises because the cost-benefit doesn't work out. But for large enterprises, it's a very good and cost-effective solution that's competitive with other products like SAP. I would rate EnterpriseOne nine out of ten.
I am a reseller. I am not a regular user of it, I'm an admin user of it and I am not aware of the application part of it. New users can use the solution as a web implementation of the application and it is a user-friendly application. I’d recommend the product to others. I would rat ether solution eight out of ten.
My advice to others is JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is excellent. It has multiple features and business processes of the industry, especially the manufacturing industry, out of the box. There are fewer customizations required. It can meet, 90 to 95 percent of the standard business processes' out-of-box functionality. It is a very good solution from a business point of view. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a nine out of ten.
We are partners with Oracle. If it's a medium or large-scale operation, I'm happy if people go for that ERP. If they want to not spend too much on their solution, like on an SAP or Oracle, this is a good option. I work for bigger clients, they have this product and they are using it for more than 12 or 15 years now and they're really happy and they're big, big, big. Therefore, the customer, if they want, could go for this product first, and if they want to go for EBS or SAP, or any other ERP, they can move over. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
My advice to others is they should know the way the world has changed post-pandemic. They should think about cloud solutions so they aren't dependent on hosting it on their premise. Somebody has to be in person available to support this solution. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a nine out of ten.
We are a system integrator. I'd advise new users if you are using JD Edwards or if you are using Oracle E-Business Suite, just go on with it and stay using it for a long time. It will be supported until, the last I heard, 2030, by Oracle and perhaps even longer. However, if you are thinking about implementing an ERP solution that's new, from the scratch, I would consider one of the cloud solutions. Then you could look to an Oracle Cloud product or you can look to Salesforce - whatever suits your business. I would go for the cloud products and not for the, well, let's say old school, on-premise products. I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
Oracle is my company's partner, and JD is an Oracle product. It's a partner to my company, and it's a client partner, but they have a license to a product version, and they also have Oracle support. There is an Oracle support portal; we ask a question, the client asks a question, and the client asks another question. We have had discussions with Oracle about this product. If you purchase this product, you will receive Oracle support for the initial days. When you buy JD Edwards products, the first step that you will need is JD Edwards implementation. For each model that you purchase, you will require the services of some functional experts. When you purchase it as a product, you will be purchasing some models from them. You will require a financial model as well as supply chain models. For each model, you will undoubtedly require supply chain, finance, and consulting. They will be responsible for the product's implementation. I would definitely recommend this solution because I have had a great experience working with this product as a developer. I would rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne an eight out of ten.
I find it really good. I have limited exposure to the product, and from my point of view, it is very customizable. It is very good because we can modify the way we want. It is stable as long as we are following Oracle guidelines. I would definitely recommend it to others. I love it. With the new versions, it has become very good. I would rate it a nine out of 10.
The deployment is handled through a third party; in which we have a team of consultants. They handle everything, from the setup, to the implementation, to the training. My advice to others is that they use what is available in the system and not attempt to exceed its capacity. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne as a five out of ten.
I would rate this solution 10 out of 10.
Make sure that you have the right strategy on whether you're going to support it internally or you're going to hire an external vendor for it. It needs a specialized skill set; it is not something that anyone can just support. I would rate it an eight out of 10. This is based on what I've heard from my customers and people who use other solutions. I haven't worked with too many other products to give a fair comparison.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a seven out of ten.
In terms of financial and distribution, this solution is one of the best. I would recommend this solution to others if they have the money. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne an eight out of ten.
We used to use the Data Access Studio (DAS) to extract data from EnterpriseOne, although we now use Oracle OBIEE for that. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Most of my experience is with on-premises deployments, although I have also worked in an environment where we hosted it on the cloud. If you have a cloud-based deployment then it's managed and maintained by the vendor, although you can still have your own customizations that are unique to the business. The vendor continuously improves this product, basing their changes according to the feedback provided by customers. At this point in time, it is difficult to asks for specific features because they're very compatible with any other system in the market. They are very strong in the manufacturing, construction, and engineering industries. My advice for anybody who is implementing JD Edwards is to make sure that all of your processes are stabilized and standardized. Follow the best practices. Make sure that the processes are not coming from somebody who had good ideas 60 years ago but in reality, are no longer effective. The best thing to do is make sure that the data is clean and you have the blueprints for the business processes according to best practices. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
In around 2007, JD Edwards went through a dip and most customers moved to other solutions. Here in South Arica, most government institutions and other clients actually started buying SAP. The company then started doing quite a bit of research and made drastic improvements. Today there are few ERP systems that can actually compete with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. For a long time already, it's been possible to run the solution on any mobile app. I like the fact that there is competition because you need different ERP's that work in certain sectors or certain industries and don't always try to cover everything. For example, there are certain ERP's which are very strong in financial institutions. I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10.
When looking for a new product, definitely consider: * Stability * IT technology * Value