INTELLIBOT vs NTT-AT WinActor comparison

ServiceNow and NTT DATA are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ServiceNow is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while NTT DATA is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. ServiceNow holds a 0.3% mindshare in RPA, compared to NTT DATA’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of ServiceNow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of NTT DATA users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

NTT-AT WinActor and INTELLIBOT compete in the automation software market. INTELLIBOT appears to have the upper hand with advanced technological integrations and AI-driven capabilities, providing a strong appeal for users seeking cutting-edge solutions, despite NTT-AT's strengths in customer support and pricing.

Features: NTT-AT WinActor includes robust integration capabilities, customizable workflows, and easy adaptation to various industries. INTELLIBOT is known for AI-driven automation, seamless cloud integration, and advanced technological integrations distinguishing it in the market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: INTELLIBOT benefits from streamlined cloud-based deployment and remote customer support. NTT-AT WinActor provides on-premise solutions with extensive training programs. While INTELLIBOT offers quicker deployment, NTT-AT emphasizes thorough training and support.

Pricing and ROI: NTT-AT WinActor is cost-effective, minimizing setup costs for a feasible ROI strategy. INTELLIBOT demands a higher initial investment but proposes greater returns through enhanced operational efficiencies, attracting clients looking for long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Automate

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Fortra's Automate is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of INTELLIBOT is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Anabel Marco

Account Director at Software Greenhouse

Can automate several processes with only one bot and is easy to implement, administer, and use

We have tried other RPA solutions like UiPath or Automation Anywhere. They are fantastic products but complex, and it's hard to understand everything. It would be best if you had a skilled developer or several. Automate is easy to implement, administer, and use. It's appropriate for us because our cases are simple and easy to automate. We don't need complicated tools with many features; We prefer to get a significant ROI quickly. We can automate several processes with only one bot, so it's much cheaper than other products where you need to buy additional licenses. We need a good value for our automation. The other solutions might be more robust, but Automate is perfect for us because we're not a large enterprise.

Read full review

Renjith Raghunathan

RPA Team Lead Developer at Standard Chartered Bank

A solution that requires minimal efforts to run multiple activities at the same time

It would be helpful to add more documentation. Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values. This is an area that could be improved. If I were to add something that would make my life easier in a new release of INTELLIBOT, then it would be making improvements to the way it is interacting with Java. The only challenge with using INTELLIBOT is the way it works with OCR, which can make creating OCR icons very challenging. In addition, there may be challenges in using the Citrix environment.

Read full review

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A great feature that you seldom see in these kind of systems is the ability to use a database as trigger to launch a task. This is something I asked for a few years ago and that was added."

"Compared to other vendors, it's the scheduling tool because a lot of vendors want to charge you extra for their enterprise-level license to have a scheduling tool built in to give you the ability to set up regular schedules to run and do certain data checks."

"The licensing of the product is very good. You only need to license it once and then you have it forever."

"We use it for specific cases, mainly secure file transfers, which are vital for us. And it works for us."

"This tool has machine learning and voice recognition and computer vision, which are both quite useful aspects. These aren't available in other tools. It's a good addition to this tool and it gives the solution an edge on the market."

"We have tried other RPA solutions like UiPath or Automation Anywhere. They are fantastic products but complex, and it's hard to understand everything. It would be best if you had a skilled developer or several. Automate is easy to implement, administer, and use. It's appropriate for us because our cases are simple and easy to automate. We don't need complicated tools with many features; We prefer to get a significant ROI quickly."

"I like the interface; it makes managing automation easy. We can set different schedules and templates for each task."

"The interface is simple, user-friendly, and very intuitive."

More Fortra's Automate pros

"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."

"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."

"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."

"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."

"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."

"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."

"There's a helpful community available through the portal."

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

Cons

"It's possible that they could use a stronger community for seeking guidance and help."

"The intelligent automation feature could be improved. It's interesting because it's simple, but the automation quality isn't always good. It's easy to use, but sometimes you need to make a slight improvement to the automation, and that's not so easy."

"While this solution is continually improving, as it is now, the user interface could use improvement when I compare it to a product like UiPath."

"The solution has a very weak knowledge base."

"The vendor is currently working on a solution that allows us to automatically create a process that is based on a document that we receive via email."

"The documentation is not that great."

"They do not encrypt passwords, so this is an issue with HIPAA compliance."

"Fortra's Automate is not as reliable as I would like it to be."

More Fortra's Automate cons

"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."

"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."

"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."

"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."

"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."

"The trigger actions need to be more robust."

"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm only involved in running the product and maintaining the systems, so I can't speak to the cost."

"From a distributor's perspective, one of the biggest selling points of Automate is its price point."

"Compared to other products, the pricing model for this solution is much more convenient, flexible, and adaptable to the Portuguese reality."

"I like the way this solution is priced because you can buy a license, or you can buy the software outright."

"It comes with a package that costs approximately $20,000 USD per year."

"From a distributor's side, one of the biggest selling points is its price point. Without going into any numbers, compared to UiPath, Automation Anywhere, and Blue Prism, we're significantly cheaper. The main difference is that other competitors usually charge you per process. However, in Automate's case, it's priced per bot. So, a bot can run multiple processes at the same time, but you are only priced for a single bot."

"The pricing is quite reasonable. We can run the process with one bot. The limitation is at the server level because they have some resources, and sometimes that is enough. It isn't too expensive, so you can get a good return off of one, and you can also have a pack of five bots that is quite competitive."

"The cost is a bit high for a small business like ours, but we manage with Fortra's Automate."

More Fortra's Automate pricing and cost advice

"At the time, one license was $5,000 USD. If we needed to negotiate for more licenses, we could negotiate a bit on the price."

"The solution requires a license and we purchased one annually. We were satisfied with the price."

"INTELLIBOT with the DPA costs approximately $1,500 USD."

"It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year."

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HelpSystems AutoMate?

We use it for specific cases, mainly secure file transfers, which are vital for us. And it works for us.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HelpSystems AutoMate?

We used the platform primarily for task automation, including transmitting EDR files. Additionally, we've utilized it...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortra Automate?

The starter pack was all we needed and was reasonable. Others were either more expensive or didn't do all that I want...

See all answers

Which lesser known RPA vendor has the best chance at unseating today's market leaders?

Intellibot.io would be my suggestion. From DPA to RPA to cognitive model long to Chatbots to IOT they have come a lon...

See all answers

What do you like most about INTELLIBOT?

The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for INTELLIBOT?

It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year.

See all answers

What do you like most about NTT-AT WinActor?

The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NTT-AT WinActor?

The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NTT-AT WinActor?

For the repeat tasks, we have two options. The first option is to use the scanner to set up the scheduler. Alternativ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Automate vs Fortra's Automate

Compared 48% of the time

UiPath vs Fortra's Automate

Compared 36% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Fortra's Automate

Compared 7% of the time

Blue Prism vs Fortra's Automate

Compared 4% of the time

MOVEit vs Fortra's Automate

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortra's Automate Competitors

UiPath vs INTELLIBOT

Compared 100% of the time

More INTELLIBOT Competitors

UiPath vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 57% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 43% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Automate

January 2025

Download Fortra's Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT

January 2025

Download INTELLIBOT product report

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2024

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Automate, Automate

No data available

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

Learn More

Video not available

Fortra

ServiceNow

NTT DATA

Overview

Fortra's Automate is predominantly used in HR and operational departments for automating reports, file manipulation, and data processing. Key uses include automating repetitive tasks, integrating PDFs and emails, running scripts, processing large data sets, transforming file formats, synchronizing databases, managing job schedules, and transferring files.

Users commend Fortra's Automate for its ease of implementation and user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, which requires minimal technical skills for efficient bot deployment. The software is appreciated for its effective scheduling tools, reliable integration capabilities, and a wide range of functions such as file interaction, secure file transfers, and extensive automation without the need for coding. Businesses achieve significant time savings and simplified processes, bolstered by continuous updates and robust customer support.

What are the key features?

Scheduling Tools: Enables precise control and timing for automation tasks
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with various systems and software
File Interaction: Comprehensive functions for file manipulation and transfer
Secure Transfers: Ensures data safety during file transfers
User-Friendly: Minimal technical skills needed for deployment and use

What benefits should you look for in reviews?

Ease of Implementation: Fast and simple setup process
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on repetitive tasks
Process Simplification: Streamlines complex workflows
Customer Support: Access to continuous support and updates

In various industries such as healthcare, transportation, and payroll, Fortra's Automate automates workflows like invoice generation, data retrieval, data uploading, and insurance eligibility checks, enhancing efficiency and accuracy for HR and operational tasks.

Intellibot is a powerful RPA Platform that is designed to simplify the lifecycle of RPA deployments at every step of the process. Speed, reliability, ease of use and extensibility are at the heart of the platform architecture. Intellibot incorporates many next generation features that enable it to deliver on even the most complex RPA projects.

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

Sample Customers

Aldergrove Financial Group, Preferred Health Professionals, Mindbeam Technologies, First Credit Union in British Columbia, Vestcom International, Prime Liberty Benefits, University of Tampa, CNLBancshares, World Precision Instruments, BJ's Restaurants, Globe Pequot Press, Accudata Technologies, Norton Healthcare, Pacific Toxicology Laboratories

Information Not Available

Exeo Tech Corporation

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

January 2025

Free Report: INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

Find out what your peers are saying about INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.