INTELLIBOT vs NTT-AT WinActor comparison

ServiceNow and NTT DATA are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ServiceNow is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while NTT DATA is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0. ServiceNow holds a 0.3% mindshare in RPA, compared to NTT DATA’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of ServiceNow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of NTT DATA users who would recommend it.

INTELLIBOT

Read 7 INTELLIBOT reviews

521 Views
197 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

Read 2 NTT-AT WinActor reviews

324 Views
223 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

INTELLIBOT

NTT-AT WinActor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between INTELLIBOT and NTT-AT WinActor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

INTELLIBOT

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

17th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

29th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of INTELLIBOT is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Asvinth Saravanan

Technical Project Manager at Standard Chartered Bank

Has limited functionality, logging uses extensive resources; automation replay is great

This solution is not very user-friendly and I would not recommend it for robotic platforms. It has limited functionality and the logging takes over 1,000 GB. As a result, each year we need to increase the size of the database and create a workaround by archiving logs. It impacts performance and is a significant pain point for us. The logging is not user-friendly from an architect's perspective. The reporting is a mess in INTELLIBOT, even the developers are struggling to identify the issues and there are also problems when there are two cases hitting the queue.

Read full review

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."

"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."

"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."

"There's a helpful community available through the portal."

"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."

"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."

"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

Cons

"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."

"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."

"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."

"The trigger actions need to be more robust."

"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."

"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."

"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year."

"INTELLIBOT with the DPA costs approximately $1,500 USD."

"The solution requires a license and we purchased one annually. We were satisfied with the price."

"At the time, one license was $5,000 USD. If we needed to negotiate for more licenses, we could negotiate a bit on the price."

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

29%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about INTELLIBOT?

The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for INTELLIBOT?

It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with INTELLIBOT?

Exception handling activities within INTELLIBOT need to improve. While working with the platform, there were instances where the bot went to a different flow than intended, even when it was suppose...

See all answers

What do you like most about NTT-AT WinActor?

The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NTT-AT WinActor?

The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NTT-AT WinActor?

For the repeat tasks, we have two options. The first option is to use the scanner to set up the scheduler. Alternatively, we can use another method where we set up the task or schedule on the manag...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath vs INTELLIBOT

Compared 100% of the time

More INTELLIBOT Competitors

UiPath vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 50% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 50% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT

November 2024

Download INTELLIBOT product report

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

October 2024

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Also Known As

No data available

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

Learn More

ServiceNow

NTT DATA

Overview

Intellibot is a powerful RPA Platform that is designed to simplify the lifecycle of RPA deployments at every step of the process. Speed, reliability, ease of use and extensibility are at the heart of the platform architecture. Intellibot incorporates many next generation features that enable it to deliver on even the most complex RPA projects.

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Exeo Tech Corporation

Buyer's Guide

INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

October 2024

Free Report: INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor

Find out what your peers are saying about INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our INTELLIBOT vs. NTT-AT WinActor report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.