Invicti vs Kiuwan comparison

Invicti and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while Kiuwan is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.8. Invicti holds a 1.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to Kiuwan’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 27 Invicti reviews

3,137 Views
1,662 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,597 Views
1,274 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Invicti

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and Kiuwan are key players in the application security testing market. Invicti has the upper hand in ease of deployment and transparency in pricing, while Kiuwan is preferred for in-depth analysis and comprehensive coverage.

Features: Invicti offers efficient scanning capabilities, integration options, and ease of deployment. Kiuwan is known for extensive code analysis, support for multiple languages, and comprehensive coverage.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could enhance false positive management, expand language support, and improve speed. Kiuwan needs to improve speed, optimize resource usage, and address customer service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive support. Kiuwan offers flexible deployment models but needs improvements in service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti provides a transparent pricing structure with satisfactory ROI. Kiuwan has higher pricing, justified by its advanced features that users value, making the investment worthwhile.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Kiuwan

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Akshay Waghmare

Manager at Deloitte

Nov 9, 2023

A stable and user-friendly solution that can be used for dynamic application security testing

We use Invicti for dynamic application security testing and to integrate files into the pipeline The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan. The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved. I have been…

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Nov 27, 2023

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan is useful because it provides functions related to secure code review, source code review, detection of security vulnerabilities, and development of proper input validations to get proper output and coding to see if all the systems in our environment are properly used. Some SQL queries are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"Invicti's best feature is the ability to identify vulnerabilities and manually verify them."

"Scan, proxify the application, and then detailed report along with evidence and remediations to problems."

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"Attacking feature: Actually, attacking is not a solo feature. It contains many attack engines, Hawk, and many properties. But Netsparker's attacking mechanism is very flexible. This increases the vulnerability detection rate. Also, Netsparker made the Hawk for real-time interactive command-line-based exploit testing. It's very valuable for a vulnerability scanner."

"The platform is stable."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."

More Invicti pros

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."

"Asset scanning could be better. Once, it couldn't scan assets, and the issue was strange. The price doesn't fit the budget of small and medium-sized businesses."

"The scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

More Invicti cons

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"It is competitive in the security market."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

55%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The inventory prices are very competitive. The competitors are more expensive, but the estimated cost of Invicti is more competitive than that of other tools. They had very good pricing. We have di...

See all answers

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

Invicti has provided a roadmap outlining the improvements they're focusing on. Given the competition, with tools like Qualys and many others in the market, the interface needs to be enhanced, integ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 17% of the time

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 17% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 56% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

October 2024

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

October 2024

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

No data available

Learn More

Invicti

Kiuwan

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Kiuwan

October 2024

Free Report: Invicti vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.