Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs Microsoft Intune comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) category. Ivanti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 6.5, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Ivanti holds a 3.2% mindshare in UEM, compared to Microsoft’s 20.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Read 8 Ivanti Neurons for MDM reviews

1,960 Views
1,725 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Microsoft Intune

Read 375 Microsoft Intune reviews

36,644 Views
12,825 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Microsoft Intune

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Microsoft Intune and Ivanti Neurons for MDM both compete in the mobile device management category. Ivanti Neurons for MDM might have the upper hand in BYOD scenarios and policy automation, while Microsoft Intune is more cost-effective when bundled with other Microsoft services.

Features: Microsoft Intune offers robust integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, seamless management, policy deployment, and cloud-based administration. It supports Azure AD co-management and features conditional access for enhanced security. Ivanti Neurons for MDM excels in BYOD scenarios, providing easy deployment and strong mobile device visibility.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Intune could improve its reporting capabilities and support for Linux and macOS devices, along with better third-party app patching and a simplified user interface. Ivanti Neurons for MDM could enhance Windows device management and reduce policy push times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Intune predominantly deploys in public cloud settings with some hybrid uses, ensuring straightforward integration with Microsoft services. Ivanti Neurons for MDM supports public, private, and on-premises cloud models, offering flexibility but also potential complexity. Microsoft Intune relies heavily on community and partner channels for support, while Ivanti Neurons for MDM provides more consistent technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Intune is cost-effective when bundled with Microsoft services and benefits from larger Microsoft licensing agreements, appealing to enterprises already using Microsoft products. Ivanti Neurons for MDM may have a higher cost but offers features that justify the expense, particularly for mobile-centric deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Intune Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Intune

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Ranking in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

16th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Intune

Ranking in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

375

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (2nd), Remote Access (2nd), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) category, the mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for MDM is 3.2%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 20.7%, down from 31.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	20.7%
Ivanti Neurons for MDM	3.2%
Other	76.1%

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

Q&A Highlights

Lahcen Belouahri

IT Coordinator at Carglass SAS

Oct 10, 2023

What are the differences between MobileIron UEM and Microsoft Intune?

MobileIron UEM and Microsoft Intune are both Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions, but they have differences: Vendor: MobileIron is a dedicated UEM provider, while Microsoft Intune is part of the Microsoft 365 suite. Integration: Intune integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's productivity and security tools, while MobileIron offers flexibility to work with various ecosystems. Ecosystem: Intune primarily targets Windows and Microsoft-centric environments, whereas MobileIron supports a broader range of platforms, including iOS and Android. Features: Intune offers extensive app management and security features for Microsoft apps, while MobileIron may provide more robust cross-platform security and app management capabilities. Pricing: Pricing structures differ; Intune may be bundled with Microsoft 365, while MobileIron's pricing varies based on features and platform support.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

MohamedElmasry

Manager, Information Technology Support at FEFundInfo

Seamless provisioning and application deployment enhance workflow, yet enhancements in asset and software spend management roles are acknowledged

The zero-touch capability where you can install all the business applications and deliver the laptop to the user, who just needs to log on to complete everything without any human intervention, are the best features in Ivanti Neurons for MDM. We have security features, patch management, compliance reports, and dashboards integrated within Ivanti.

Read full review

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The products are quite good when they are operational."

"The user interface is user-friendly."

"The solution is good, it's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."

"The security features in Ivanti Neurons for MDM are very effective, which is why we have been distributing it for the past 15 years."

"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."

"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."

"The company provides great customer service."

"MobileIron UEM is a scalable solution."

More Ivanti Neurons for MDM pros

"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."

"Most people prefer to use Intune if they want to implement conditional access policies to restrict customer Exchange Online or Exchange user formats emails until their devices comply."

"The most valuable feature is the policy CSPs."

"It is quite policy-enabled, so you can build pretty much any policy to manage remote endpoints."

"It is a very helpful and easy solution."

"Overall, the best features of Microsoft Intune are its ease of management and robust security protocols, which are what I value most about it and how it stands out."

"Microsoft Intune has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security and efficiency."

"Implementing Microsoft Intune has provided a more streamlined and consistent method for device management across our multiple domains, effectively consolidating our administrative efforts."

More Microsoft Intune pros

Cons

"I also found the UI to be quite complicated to work with, so it takes quite a bit of time to train any new staff and to get them to understand how the solution works."

"The release of new versions often goes in the wrong direction with Ivanti. The test team or the testing procedures are flawed because they release new versions with numerous basic issues."

"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."

"It was not an easy initial setup for us. It was a bit difficult and not really straightforward."

"The disadvantage in connection with Windows devices is that the pushing of policies takes some time."

"The MDM, asset management, and software spend management are areas that could have more improvement in Ivanti Neurons for MDM."

"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."

"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."

More Ivanti Neurons for MDM cons

"The solution does require maintenance, and it is complex to maintain, especially regarding updates, patching, and releases."

"The main disadvantage seen today is regarding Linux clients. We have a lot of development resources that have Linux on their clients, and we can't manage them on the same platform, as we do with other clients such as macOS and Windows. So, it should have support for Linux clients. It should also have better support for macOS."

"Some enrollment features could be improved."

"Microsoft Intune can be improved with a more intuitive admin interface, faster policy synchronization, better troubleshooting and reporting capabilities, especially for complex and hybrid environments, along with more granular control and simplified management for advanced configurations."

"For additional functionality, I suggest that Microsoft could expand on asset management. Since the platform is there, they could develop it into a full-fledged asset management system."

"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."

"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."

"It can improve for new users; in the starting phase, we found that the logs are too complex or scattered."

More Microsoft Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"The price of Intune is often included as part of a bundle with other Microsoft licenses, which makes it somewhat cheaper."

"Existing E5 license holders for M365, Intune, and Azure, receive a free license."

"Cost is not my department, but the product is included in the E5 license that we already pay for every user, so no additional cost is incurred."

"The price is reasonable, but they should lower it a bit to make it more competitive. It's cheaper than AirWatch and other products, but I still feel like Microsoft can make a base version or with Exchange online or a la carte only Intune version which will be useful. A customer who doesn't want to go full-fledged E3 or E5 can take out or consume an Intune solution only for their purpose, and we want to target that customer."

"Its price is fair. It's a normal price. It isn't too expensive or too cheap."

"All security solutions worldwide are expensive. Microsoft has allowed a small scale of features within Microsoft Intune for cost-efficient solutions. If you want the full suite, you need to invest more to gain better security features."

"Any bundle package, such as Security E3, covers multiple things, such as AAP, BitLocker, etc. If you go for them individually, they would be more expensive. Bundling makes the price more attractive and competitive."

"The overall pricing of Microsoft Intune is good for companies that have big IT budgets, 3,000 or more users and devices."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Lahcen Belouahri

IT Coordinator at Carglass SAS

Oct 10, 2023

What are the differences between MobileIron UEM and Microsoft Intune?

2 out of 3 answers

Ronald Chavez

Cloud Services at Supérate

Jun 28, 2023

The MobileIron UEM solution is now Ivanti and is divided into 3 areas: Client Management (EndPoint)-Mobile Management (MDM) and Desktop or workspace customization. Microsoft solutions are Defender Endpoint - Microsoft Intune (MDM and MAM). The advantage, if they are Windows, is because the Defender antivirus is managed in Defender EndPoint and the management or control of Android or Windows devices and application deployment With Intune; It is also complemented with Office 365. I hope to be helpful. https://www.ivanti.com/es/lp/uem/reports/gartner-magic-quadrant-for-uem

Read full answer

Avigayil Henderson

Test at PeerSpot

Jul 2, 2023

Hello Lahcen, I am posting this comment on behalf of one of our site users who is the Head of Infrastructure at his company. He says: One of the key differences is MobileIron is much more mature than Intune in some aspects. So you have much more granular controls in MobileIron if you need to. Microsoft Intune on the other hand is easier to use in my opinion and has most features that most organization needs. If you already have a Microsoft 365 Tenant or intend to have one, Microsoft Intune is really a no-brainer. Unless you need those super granular controls that only MobileIron or Airwatch has, you will want to keep Intune. Intune is much faster and easier to deploy if you know the solution well. I typically need 1 week to configure everything in a Tenant to manage IOS & Windows devices as long as the requirements are fixed before I start the configuration. There are not many Intune experts out there but it’s not that difficult to learn either. MobileIron is a much more complicated solution and has been adopted from an on-prem solution to start with so it has its legacies limitation too. Microsoft Intune started on the cloud right from the start so it does not have such issues.

Read full answer

See all 3 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	186
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	184

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MobileIron UEM?

The pricing is comparable to Microsoft Intune, but Ivanti Neurons for MDM offers many features and innovation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MobileIron UEM?

Windows devices could be improved, as we are more familiar with client-managed devices where we install the application or the client of Ivanti Neurons for MDM or MobileIron in those devices. We ar...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MobileIron UEM?

We are working with MDM requirements for major purposes alongside other products including mobile application management and content management on mobile phones. Our market in the Philippines in te...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes it easy to control security and manage the usage of mobile apps when you have a ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of the things I like about it: Pros: Protected productivity: Intune gives you th...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also access to both Microsoft’s user community as well as around-the-clock customer s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Workspace ONE UEM vs Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Compared 10% of the time

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Compared 10% of the time

Ivanti Endpoint Manager vs Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Compared 9% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Compared 7% of the time

Sophos Mobile vs Ivanti Neurons for MDM

Compared 7% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons for MDM Competitors

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

May 2026

Download Ivanti Neurons for MDM product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

May 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Also Known As

MobileIron UEM, MobileIron Unified Endpoint Management, MobileIron EMM, MobileIron Enterprise Mobility Management

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Overview

Ivanti Neurons for MDM offers centralized management for mobile devices and endpoints, enhancing security and efficiency with a strong user-friendly interface.

Ivanti Neurons for MDM provides effective control with zero-touch capabilities, compliance reports, and advanced dashboards. Organizations use it to enhance endpoint security and streamline device management with seamless enterprise integration. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in setup simplicity, interface intuitiveness, and support services. It handles app deployment and patch management well but struggles with basic testing and integration issues on version releases.

What are the standout features?

Zero-touch capability: Enables efficient initial setup without user intervention.
Advanced security: Protects endpoints with robust security measures.
Compliance reports: Generates reports to ensure adherence to required standards.
Patch management: Manages updates across devices to maintain security.
Dashboards: Provides a comprehensive graphical overview of device statuses.
Tunneling: Secures data transfer through encrypted tunnels.

What benefits should users expect?

Automation for efficiency: Reduces manual workloads through automated processes.
Scalability: Supports the growing needs of expanding organizations.
Device inventory visibility: Offers clear views of device distribution and use.
Customer service: Provides support and assistance to ensure operational continuity.

Ivanti Neurons for MDM is implemented across industries to manage mobile devices and endpoints, whether on-premise or cloud-based. Companies in the Philippines utilize it for remote management and app distribution, especially useful for internal app development in remote work environments.

Ivanti

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Frontier Airlines

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Intune

April 2026

Free Report: Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Intune and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Intune report.

See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.