Ixia Hawkeye vs NetCrunch comparison

Keysight Technologies and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #32 with an average rating of 10.0, while AdRem Software is ranked #82. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

436 Views
299 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

361 Views
290 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

```html

NetCrunch and Ixia Hawkeye are competing in network monitoring and testing solutions. Ixia Hawkeye offers superior functionality and reliability, making it a more robust option despite the higher cost.

Features:NetCrunch focuses on comprehensive network monitoring, live performance data, alerting, and integrated remote management. Ixia Hawkeye offers synthetic transaction monitoring, detailed performance analytics, and excels in end-user experience and network testing. Organizations emphasizing performance testing and diagnostics may find Ixia Hawkeye's feature set more suitable.

Room for Improvement:NetCrunch could enhance its user interface, integration capabilities with other tools, and provide more advanced performance analytics. Ixia Hawkeye can improve its deployment process, streamline user experience, and offer more competitive pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:NetCrunch offers a straightforward deployment process, well-documented installation steps, and responsive customer support. Ixia Hawkeye, while having an advanced setup complexity, compensates with extensive documentation and a robust support system. NetCrunch's simpler deployment may appeal to smaller teams or those seeking rapid implementation.

Pricing and ROI:NetCrunch is positioned as a cost-effective solution with a lower setup cost, aiming to deliver strong ROI through competitive pricing. Although Ixia Hawkeye commands a higher initial investment, its advanced capabilities offer considerable value in enhancing network performance and analysis capabilities. Organizations focused on comprehensive network diagnostics may find Ixia Hawkeye's higher cost justifiable due to the potential long-term benefits and insights it provides.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. NetCrunch

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

32nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (4th)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

62nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (26th), Log Management (77th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Reginald Pierre

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 39% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 34% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 27% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 56% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 22% of the time

Nagios Core vs NetCrunch

Compared 22% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2025

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

NetCrunch is the complete network monitoring solution for monitoring traffic, topology, devices, systems, logs, and services. It's policy, and template-based configuration makes managing thousands of nodes a breeze. It automatically generates layer-2 maps and manages monitoring dependencies. NetCrunch supports major operating systems, virtualization platforms, and the Cloud. Complete SNMP support with 8,700+ MIBs included and a built-in MIB compiler.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

EMA

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. NetCrunch

April 2025

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.