Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ixia Hawkeye vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
Ixia Hawkeye's customer service is effective and fast, though initial licensing issues and email challenges can affect perception.
No sentiment score available
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE's support is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, though some desire more dedicated engineers for efficient resolution.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.0
Users need enhanced customization, more test options, better graphs, and improved support features for Ixia Hawkeye's network performance.
Sentiment score
3.8
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE needs interface improvements, feature integration, modular pricing, better training, and enhanced security for user efficiency.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.5
Ixia Hawkeye is praised for scalability and efficiency, though users are disappointed by the lack of new capabilities.
Sentiment score
8.5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is praised for scalability, especially in virtual/cloud environments, despite hardware and budget challenges.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.8
Ixia Hawkeye offers easy deployment, affordability, and precise network analysis with detailed views for bandwidth, latency, and application performance tests.
Sentiment score
8.2
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE provides comprehensive traffic analysis, real-time insights, and interoperability, offering a unified view for effective problem-solving.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.4
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is generally stable, with minor configuration issues, occasional crashes, but receives high reliability satisfaction ratings.
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics
Sponsored
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
58th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ixia Hawkeye
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
52nd
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (48th)
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
23rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is 1.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

ALEXANDRE VIANNA - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a single dashboard, but is expensive
We use this solution to manage our mission environment The single dashboard is a valuable feature.  The technical support needs improvement. The initial setup is straightforward. The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.  Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of…
José Enrique Cano Rodriguez - PeerSpot reviewer
A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting
Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.
Ruslan Melnyk - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for network performance monitoring
My manager can explain the use cases attached to the product. I am a unit leader in my company, and I don't sell the product directly to our partners or customers. In my company, I manage certain processes and a team while building, developing, and providing them with a direction for the market. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is a good solution for network performance monitoring since it is not cloud-based. My company sells NETSCOUT nGeniusONE in eight to ten countries. I think the solution is not good for capacity planning, but it is better to help find problems in applications because not every infrastructure is good at managing working applications. I think it is a solution meant for applications. The tool is useful for solving problems attached to applications. The tool's real-time network monitoring capability was used when the product was more reactive. In our company, if we use real-time monitoring, then we need to deal with raw traffic. In our company, if we don't see any problem in the real-time systems, we have the possibility to rely on the tool since it acts like a time machine for us, which can allow us to get back to the areas of problem and solve them. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. For many users, it can be a good monitoring system that can be scaled up in the future. I think it is a good product to start with when working systems in an environment. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is another tool used to manage raw traffic, and I find it to integrate well into our customers' network. I am not using it actively on the system. I use the tool for network packet brokers. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?
We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.
What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?
It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video strea...
What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?
Improvements in network performance are essential.
What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?
Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as p...
Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other soluti...
What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?
There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product may come a...
 

Also Known As

No data available
No data available
NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
EMA
Cerner Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.