Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ixia Hawkeye vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Keysight Technologies and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #35 with an average rating of 10.0, while Splunk is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Ixia Hawkeye
Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews
  • 248 Views
  • 172 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Splunk AppDynamics
Read 245 Splunk AppDynamics reviews
  • 5,824 Views
  • 3,684 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 6, 2025

Splunk AppDynamics and Ixia Hawkeye are competitive products in network and application performance monitoring. Ixia Hawkeye has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Splunk AppDynamics provides real-time visibility into application health, offering valuable transaction tracing and detailed analytics. Ixia Hawkeye differentiates itself with proactive network performance assessments and synthetic end-user traffic generation, focusing on preemptive issue detection.

Room for Improvement: Splunk AppDynamics could enhance its preemptive issue detection capabilities and ease of use for non-IT users. It may also benefit from more comprehensive network performance features. Ixia Hawkeye could improve its application depth and insight, expand its analytics capabilities, and streamline its interface for broader enterprise deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics offers flexible deployment models with intuitive installation processes. It provides robust support but focuses more on flexible installation. Ixia Hawkeye is known for easy deployment and provides robust customer service with an emphasis on continuous monitoring and streamlined support.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial setup cost, but its long-term ROI is significant due to application depth. Ixia Hawkeye offers a cost-effective setup with swift cost-benefit ratios thanks to rapid deployment and value in continuous network diagnostics, emphasizing affordability and speed.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk AppDynamics
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
35th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (4th), Network Monitoring Software (32nd)
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
245
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 3.3%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez - PeerSpot reviewer
A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting
Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.
Read full review
Muhammad Zeeshan Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic mapping enhances workflows that are user-friendly
One aspect that requires improvement is the agent. Without an agent, gathering sufficient information on applications is challenging. Additionally, the agent sometimes creates performance issues in production environments. If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems. Moving to an agentless solution, like what some competitors are doing, would be beneficial.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."
"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."
"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."
"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is its ability to track the transactions between different applications."
"It helped to find quick solutions for specific business transactions."
"AppDynamics is scalable. They can monitor billions of transactions because they're not monitoring all transactions. They're monitoring samples. So, they can offer good monitoring for the huge sites."
"Autodiscovery of application topology, based on real user traffic."
"The solution saves time and cost."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I don't see any problems in the solution...The solution's technical support was good."
"The transaction snapshots are the most valuable feature of AppDynamics"
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is that you can easily determine the load on the application."
More Splunk AppDynamics pros
 

Cons

"Improvements in network performance are essential."
"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."
"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."
"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."
"I could not find a user-friendly interface for querying, and analytics sometimes gives the wrong results...I feel that analytics could have been better in searching and running the analytical queries."
"Installation and configuration can be very tough. An average user without specialized knowledge can't do this. You need to have DevOps and QA teams handle it. During installation, a lot of customers get stuck trying to track the database or the API part, and they have to contact customer support."
"The product's drawback is the licensing pricing. It could be better."
"I would like the ability to choose from some pre-defined dashboards and reports because as it is now, you have to define them separately for each implementation."
"If you have a single URL and all the operations are coming in as part of the header, you will not be able to segregate them for different actions."
"This is an expensive solution."
"There needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings."
"If we consider the implementation of alternative solutions, such as Dynatrace, there is a notable difference in the approach to agent-based service monitoring. For instance, Dynatrace employs a single-agent solution, which can pose security concerns. When installing Dynatrace, granting the agent ld pro payload rights is a requirement. In contrast, our solution ensures a more secure approach by not requiring root and administration access. While we currently utilize an agent-based solution, there may be a shift in the next one or two years, possibly with the adoption of Open Telemetry. It's anticipated that many APM vendors, including Dynatrace, may alter their structure or strategy for implementation. However, as of now, the trend is towards an increasing number of implementations daily."
More Splunk AppDynamics cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."
"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."
"The licensing scheme is very complex. They need to make it easier."
"The licensing cost is fairly high"
"It would be better if there were more solutions incorporated into the base price. ​"
"Yearly payments have to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution. The solution has no additional costs apart from the licensing costs."
"I believe there was probably an extra charge whenever I wanted to contact the support team."
"We have two different licensing models for this solution. One of them is the agent based model, which requires payment per agent. The other is an infrastructure based model, where the price is based on the CPU core. For the infrastructure model wholesale level pricing applies. All of the up to date licensing prices for this product are available on the manufacturers website."
"AppDynamics is an expensive solution."
"We have purchased a few licenses for AppDynamics Database Monitoring and the price is high."
More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Educational Organization
48%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?
It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?
Improvements in network performance are essential.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?
Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...
See all answers
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
See all answers
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...
See all answers
What do you like most about AppDynamics?
The solution saves time and cost.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 39% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 34% of the time
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 27% of the time
More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 15% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 10% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 8% of the time
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 7% of the time
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 6% of the time
More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
March 2025
Ixia Hawkeye reportDownload Ixia Hawkeye product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk AppDynamics
March 2025
Splunk AppDynamics reportDownload Splunk AppDynamics product report
 

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.
Keysight Technologies

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?
  • Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
  • Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
  • JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
  • Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
  • Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.
How does AppDynamics benefit users?
  • Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
  • Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
  • Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
  • Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

EMA
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Buyer's Guide
Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk AppDynamics
April 2025
Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk AppDynamics
Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.