Ixia Hawkeye vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Keysight Technologies and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #35 with an average rating of 10.0, while Splunk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

248 Views
172 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 50 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

1,711 Views
1,010 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 6, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Ixia Hawkeye compete in the comprehensive monitoring solutions category. Splunk Observability Cloud seems to have the upper hand in data insights and predictive analytics, whereas Ixia Hawkeye excels in network performance metrics, making it suitable for network-centric environments.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud provides high scalability, advanced data analytics, and real-time monitoring, appealing to organizations focused on operational intelligence. In contrast, Ixia Hawkeye offers specialized network performance features, including proactive issue detection and comprehensive protocol analysis, advantageous for network troubleshooting.

Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud could enhance network-specific metrics, ease of use for non-technical users, and reduce setup complexity. Ixia Hawkeye could improve in handling large datasets, provide more advanced data analytics options, and enhance integration with other IT systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud stands out with seamless cloud deployment and extensive integration options, along with strong customer support. Ixia Hawkeye offers straightforward on-premises deployment, essential for immediate local monitoring, and provides specialized network-focused customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher setup costs but offers significant ROI through its analytics capabilities. Ixia Hawkeye is priced more accessibly, delivering ROI via its network performance focus, suiting organizations prioritizing network health with a smaller investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (4th), Network Monitoring Software (32nd)

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (11th), Cloud Monitoring Software (9th), Container Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

"Splunk APM helps us to find errors immediately and resolve them."

"The most valuable feature is log reporting."

"It is a good tool. It allows you to set alerts for application and infrastructure monitoring, and it allows you to create dashboards."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring gives us complete visibility without the need for storage."

"Splunk's GUI and dashboard capacity are the most valuable features of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring."

"The data collection from our VMs, containers, databases, and backend components is valuable."

"Splunk APM has helped us to standardize logging and monitoring procedures."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"It is essential for the monitoring tool to deliver quick response times when generating analytical reports, instead of prolonged delays."

"I've been using the Splunk query language, and it can be a bit time-consuming to set up the queries I need."

"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."

"We still use Splunk Enterprise licensing. A lot of the newer features go into Splunk Cloud before Enterprise. We're not looking to switch our licensing over, so we're falling behind on the newer features."

"One thing I recently ran into was that the logs on the server most often get Gzipped after they have been rotated. We found that we were not monitoring some of the things, so we had to go back and pull them in. Right now, it pulls one at a time, untars it, or unzips it, so I cannot look at the entire history. There can be an improvement in that area."

"The clustering part of indexes can be more refined."

"Splunk APM's performance could be improved - at the moment, it's very slow and takes forever to give me what I want."

"We currently lack log analysis capabilities in Splunk APM."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"The price of Splunk APM is less than some of its competitors."

"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."

"Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available. We sometimes encountered issues in setting up alerts. The custom detector could be m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The main purpose of using Splunk APM is to optimize our application. We use Splunk APM primarily to understand how the application works, how it uses resources, and its response time in connection ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 40% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 33% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 27% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

March 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Splunk Observability Cloud combines log search, data integration, and dashboards for seamless monitoring, enhancing infrastructure visibility and security. Its cloud integration and scalability support diverse environments, improving operational efficiency.

Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring tools with user-friendly interfaces, enabling end-to-end infrastructure visibility. Its real-time alerting and predictive capabilities enhance security monitoring, while centralized dashboards provide cross-platform visibility. Users benefit from fast data integration and extensive insights into application performance. Despite its advantages, improvements could be made in integration with other tools, data reliability, scalability, and cost management. Users face challenges in configuration complexity and require better automation and endpoint protection features. Enhancing AI integration, alerts, and adaptation for high-throughput services could further improve usability.

What are the key features of Splunk Observability Cloud?

Log Search: Efficiently search and analyze log data for enhanced insights.
Data Integration: Fast integration across platforms for comprehensive visibility.
Custom Dashboards: Powerful and adaptable dashboards for real-time monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Seamless integration with cloud services for scalable solutions.
Application Performance Monitoring: Advanced tools for improving application performance.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Infrastructure Monitoring: Improved visibility and monitoring across infrastructure components.
Operational Efficiency: Enhancements in data analysis lead to efficient operations.
Business Resilience: Supports adaptability and swift responses to changing needs.
Security Management: Enhances threat identification and response through real-time alerts.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting compliance and auditing requirements effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for application performance monitoring and infrastructure metrics. Its ability to track incidents and analyze machine data benefits network infrastructure, while distributed tracing and log analysis aid in tackling security threats. Organizations often integrate it for compliance and auditing purposes, enhancing visibility into network traffic and optimizing performance.

Splunk

Sample Customers

EMA

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.