Jama Connect vs OpenText Software Delivery Management comparison

Jama and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Jama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Jama holds a 4.0% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Jama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Jama Connect

Read 16 Jama Connect reviews

3,366 Views
1,481 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

3,308 Views
3,176 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Jama Connect

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Jama Connect and OpenText Software Delivery Management compete in requirements management and software delivery. Jama Connect has an advantage in requirements management due to its strong collaboration and traceability features, whereas OpenText Software Delivery Management has an edge with its extensive tools for software delivery, making it ideal for agile environments.

Features: Jama Connect offers robust collaboration tools, detailed requirements traceability, and a user-friendly interface, making it easier to manage complex projects. OpenText Software Delivery Management provides advanced planning, comprehensive reporting tools, and seamless integration capabilities, allowing for efficient team collaboration throughout the software delivery lifecycle.

Room for Improvement: Jama Connect could improve in areas such as enhancing real-time metrics, expanding third-party integrations, and simplifying customization options to boost efficiency. OpenText Software Delivery Management may benefit from simplifying its setup process, refining its user interface for better accessibility, and offering more flexible pricing models to accommodate various organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jama Connect is straightforward to deploy on the cloud and provides responsive customer support, facilitating smooth onboarding. OpenText Software Delivery Management, although comprehensive, demands a more complex setup but offers robust support beneficial for extensive implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Jama Connect provides competitive pricing focusing on high ROI by streamlining requirement management tasks. Although OpenText Software Delivery Management may entail higher costs, it delivers value for organizations needing comprehensive software delivery solutions with its expansive toolset.

To learn more, read our detailed Jama Connect vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jama Connect

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (4th)

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jama Connect is 4.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 5.0%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Software Delivery Management	5.0%
Jama Connect	4.0%
Other	91.0%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Lasse Mikkonen

Principal Consultant at Contribyte

Traceability has improved documentation for auditors and regulators

The collaboration feature in Jama Connect could be improved because it is only used by a limited number of people within an organization due to license costs. For broader collaboration that includes departments like marketing and engineering, many still rely on tools like Slack or Confluence. Additionally, there are areas where usability and configurability could be enhanced.

Read full review

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the single identity provider capability, which simplifies the integration with various platforms, like Google App Store and Microsoft Azure, for providing user access."

"The impact that Jama Connect provides for my company overall is significant as it saves a huge amount of time."

"The relationship mapping feature is especially helpful, as it allows us to connect different requirements and compliance-related documentation."

"Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful."

"You can get full traceability with any other system. It also includes a test module, and you build the traceability matrix incrementally throughout the development process."

"Traceability is a key differentiator for Jama Connect, especially compared to Jira."

"We use Jama Connect mainly for requirements management."

"I like Jama Connect because it's easy to use and understand. The widgets are great, and linking is straightforward. The solution is not complex compared to its competitors."

More Jama Connect pros

"The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services."

"It is a very stable tool. The tool has been in the industry for so many years. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"Octane creates a gentle approach to Agile-based projects."

"An improvement on previous versions because it comes as preconfigured as possible."

"The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks."

"The user experience is a lot better than any tool that I have used before. Overall, it is great. It has a smooth interface, which is very user-friendly. It makes it easier to work together and have more transparency and customization, which is very good."

"Micro Focus' technical support is good."

"The key feature is the usability. It is fast to learn and easy to use. It's very intuitive to work with. Most of the important functions are available via a few clicks, compared to other tools where I have to open a sub-menu and then a sub-menu and another sub-menu, and then press a button."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros

Cons

"I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."

"There are a few areas where Jama Connect can improve. One suggestion is to enhance the built-in feature of profile generation."

"Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects."

"There are some security concerns with Jama Connect, including two-factor enablement."

"The initial setup could be better, it's complicated."

"The solution is expensive."

"The collaboration feature in Jama Connect could be improved because it is only used by a limited number of people within an organization due to license costs."

"The solution is very software-centric, and its validation piece is not time-efficient at all."

More Jama Connect cons

"Octane, from an administration perspective, is very limited. The application is improving with each release but what is missing is the ability to manage users and workspaces. I would also like "usable" reporting for more than a few workspaces. Also still missing is the ability to copy a workspace or get data in or out, except for limited REST calls."

"The reporting needs to be improved and allow for customization. I want to build my own widgets, but I don't want to use the ones already in the system. I want to build mine from scratch."

"The product's requirements management feature needs enhancement in terms of functionality."

"I have yet to experience the CI/CD part of Micro Focus ALM Octane but as demonstrated by the team who is providing the services, I see that the CI/CD could improve. When we check in the code, for the code snippet that has been checked in by a particular user, you need to open a separate file. When comparing Micro Focus ALM Octane to Jira, they have a separate window in which you can click on the ID and the code is visible in the snippet. It's a two-step process in Micro Focus ALM Octane and it's a single-step process in Jira. It's essential for the developers to think about this difference."

"It would help us if ALM Octane got FedRAMP-certified, so our government departments could use the cloud solution. That way our external consultants could access it. We've created a URL to get to it, but if it were FedRAMP-certified and service and had support in the continental United States, that would be better."

"Updating items, sorting, bulk updates—these things could have a bit more flexibility, but it's still possible to do them."

"It could use just some small improvements. I would like additional features, like planning features, user story mapping, or connection to collaboration tools."

"There are some challenges when we want to integrate the tool with other products, and it takes time for a team to figure out how to do it."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

"The cost seems very competitive with other offerings."

"If you want to have creative licenses, pricing may be an issue with the licenses, as it can become quite expensive over time to serve many people."

"Jama Connect is a little pricy."

"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

"The product is highly priced compared to other tools."

"The solution has reduced our testing costs."

"It will be as expensive as ALM.NET, if not more expensive. But here's a good tip: If you have ALM.NET, you are able to share your licenses from ALM.NET to Octane. You just have to define a dedicated number of licenses on ALM.NET and then you can share them with ALM Octane, with some configuration effort. This is something that you have to take into account, that there is a possibility of such license sharing that could decrease your costs. Compared to open-source tools, the price the ALM Octane is definitely higher, in terms of the licensing cost."

"I would say that it is an affordable product. There is an annual service fee, which is one of the additional payments to be made apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."

"ALM Octane is very expensive."

"For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time."

"It's pretty pricey, one of the most expensive ones on the market... The value depends on if you use all the features that it has. It comes with a lot of features. The difference between the license structure of ALM and Octane versus JIRA, is that you get everything with ALM and Octane... For JIRA, you buy the pieces one piece at a time."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

28%

Healthcare Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jama Connect?

I like Jama Connect because it's easy to use and understand. The widgets are great, and linking is straightforward. The solution is not complex compared to its competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jama Connect?

The text and diagram handling in Jama Connect could be improved. The formatting is quite tricky, and diagrams don't import sometimes depending on the format. Importing diagrams into a requirement c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jama Connect?

My main use cases for Jama Connect involve managing our requirements through to test and validation. This includes reviewing the requirements, using the review functionality, and supporting our who...

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Jama Connect

Compared 33% of the time

Jira vs Jama Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs Jama Connect

Compared 12% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Jama Connect

Compared 9% of the time

More Jama Connect Competitors

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 38% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 7% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect

October 2025

Download Jama Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

October 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

Overview

Jama Connect is a software platform designed for requirements management, risk management, and testing in product development processes. It allows teams to collaboratively define, track, and manage requirements throughout the entire product lifecycle. Jama Connect enables organizations to improve communication, increase efficiency, and ensure compliance with industry standards and regulations.

Jama Connect Features:

Requirements Management: Jama Connect allows you to capture, organize, and trace requirements, ensuring alignment across teams and stakeholders.
Collaboration and Communication: The platform facilitates collaboration and communication among team members, enabling real-time feedback, discussions, and decision-making.
Test Management: Jama Connect supports test case management, test execution tracking, and defect management, helping ensure comprehensive testing and quality assurance.
Risk Management: You can identify, assess, and mitigate risks using Jama Connect's risk management capabilities, promoting proactive risk management throughout the product development lifecycle.
Traceability and Impact Analysis: The platform provides traceability matrices and impact analysis tools, allowing you to understand the relationships between requirements, tests, and other artifacts.
Compliance and Audit Support: Jama Connect helps organizations maintain compliance with industry standards and regulations by providing audit trails, documentation, and version control.

Jama Connect Benefits:

Improved Requirement Collaboration: Jama Connect enhances collaboration among stakeholders, including product managers, engineers, testers, and customers, leading to better alignment and understanding of requirements.
Enhanced Efficiency: The platform streamlines and automates various aspects of requirements management, reducing manual effort and improving efficiency in the product development process.
Increased Product Quality: By ensuring clear and traceable requirements, facilitating comprehensive testing, and proactive risk management, Jama Connect helps improve product quality and reliability.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Efficient requirements management and streamlined collaboration enable faster development cycles and reduced time-to-market for products and solutions.
Regulatory Compliance: Jama Connect's features and capabilities support compliance with industry standards and regulations, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements.
Greater Visibility and Transparency: The platform provides real-time visibility into project progress, status, and potential issues, fostering transparency and enabling informed decision-making.

Reviews from Real Users

Project Management Director, Technology at a real estate company, says that "Jama Connect is a good tool for the entire software development cycle."

Lasse Mikkonen, Principal Consultant at Contribyte, states that Jama Connect “Offers great templates and predefined settings and it has a very good inbuilt test management module”.

Senior Program Manager Software at a manufacturing company, comments on Jama support, “I think the collaboration with Jama is pretty good, and they listen to us and do a lot of customizations for us to make it work better. Hopefully, it would have been the same with any other company. However, Jama provides essentially 24-hour support.”

Jama

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management

September 2025

Free Report: Jama Connect vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jama Connect vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.