Jira vs LiquidPlanner comparison

Atlassian and LiquidPlanner are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Atlassian is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while LiquidPlanner is ranked #33. Atlassian holds a 9.1% mindshare in PMS, compared to LiquidPlanner’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of LiquidPlanner users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 274 Jira reviews

3,248 Views
2,129 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

LiquidPlanner

Read 3 LiquidPlanner reviews

158 Views
122 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Jira

LiquidPlanner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Jira and LiquidPlanner are project management solutions that cater to different needs. LiquidPlanner seems to have the upper hand in features with advanced capabilities, making it worth its higher price.

Features: Jira offers extensive integrations, agile capabilities, and customizable dashboards appealing to software development teams prioritizing flexibility. LiquidPlanner provides predictive scheduling, advanced resource management, and more detailed planning tools, attracting teams looking for precision in complex project environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira allows flexible deployment options such as cloud or on-premises setups and has comprehensive support, including documentation and a large community. LiquidPlanner, being a cloud-based solution, emphasizes straightforward deployment along with dedicated customer support, ensuring smoother adoption for specific teams.

Pricing and ROI: Jira offers a lower setup cost with a straightforward pricing model, making it cost-effective for large teams focusing on scalable project management. LiquidPlanner, though having a higher initial setup cost, is seen as delivering a greater ROI due to its advanced project estimates and resource allocation, justifying its investment for teams needing detailed planning and predictability.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. LiquidPlanner Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Project Management Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

274

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd)

LiquidPlanner

Ranking in Project Management Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Jira is 9.1%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Saroj Ekka

Technical Delivery Lead at Applied Materials

Offers good repository integration, sprint board and easy to set up

There are some features and reports we need that are not there. For example, if I have to find out the capacity of the current sprint by user and compare it with the previous sprint, that visibility isn't there. We can know the capacity and what happened with the whole sprint, but not for an individual person to see where it's falling and how it's tracking. Report and analytics capabilities are important for a product manager. That visibility is important, so we use Jira. Some of the features are there, and I use my own Excels or other data things to compensate for that.

Read full review

Paul Gruver

Sr. Project Manager at Stradley Ronon

Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management

It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integrates with other components."

"The solution has been very stable overall."

"The most valuable features of Jira are all the integrations with other systems. It's not the best in any specific area but it has lots of plug-ins and integrations."

"Jira has a useful user interface and overall is easy to understand and learn."

"Jira is a pretty capable product, and a lot of features are valuable. We value being able to set up separate projects and configure teams in them, set up sprints, and manage our sprints with its history tracking. These are all very useful features. It has been a very popular product for our work."

"We use Jira for project management and tracking."

"The burndown charts help track projects."

"Jira is a comprehensive tool for managing projects. It helps in task segregation and assignment, making it time-efficient for employees."

More Jira pros

"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."

Cons

"I would love to have more features to make nice documents, like Release Notes or a feature overview, right from JIRA."

"I would like our clients' IT group to be able to have oversight without setting up agents. We're managing tickets, and I'd like their IT group to see everything we're doing without having to set them up as agents. There should be a better way of managing their users. I've got such requests, but Jira is expensive, and it is difficult to pay an agent fee for somebody else to view these tickets. Currently, the only way in which I can do that is by setting a user up as an agent, and it becomes cost-prohibitive. They need to do a better job on ticket viewers."

"ClickUp is a good alternative to Jira, so they have a better interface [GUI]. I don't like Jira's graphical interface - it could be more user-friendly. Jira looks old school."

"Once the solution is deployed, it's not easy to configure."

"Reporting is something Jira could work on. The reporting capabilities should have the same flexibility we see in Excel, including the ability to manipulate data and create graphs. They need to have that, so we don't need to export to a spreadsheet."

"The reporting capabilities, specifically customized reports, should be improved. The out-of-box reports don't meet our needs. We are big into customizing our reports, and being able to do ad hoc reporting would be good."

"Lacks field-level permission in the cloud version."

"Jira could be more, for example, like Micro Focus, which is what I mostly work with currently."

More Jira cons

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We had a perpetual license but have changed to a subscription."

"The tool is expensive."

"JIRA's pricing is very economical. I would say that JIRA is a great deal more economical than Microsoft."

"It depends on the type of license. In terms of subscription, it is cheap, and it works pretty well."

"If you are using just Jira, it is cheap, but if you start to use it and you feel you need some more services or more functions, then you have to buy add-ons, which can make it expensive."

"The price seems reasonable to me. It's very similar to Splunk."

"For very small companies, if you have less than 10 individuals, it is $10 a year for each of the products. When we were a part of the enterprise and had more than 10 people using it, or before they came up with this solution for small companies, it was $2,500 a year for the license for Jira and Confluence, and I believe something like $600 a year to perpetuate the license. I can't remember if it was $600 or $2,500 annually. It was for up to 25 people at the time, and this was in the early 2000s and mid 2000s."

"The price of Jira is reasonable."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

52%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 19% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs Jira

Compared 9% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 7% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Jira

Compared 7% of the time

More Jira Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

January 2025

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

January 2025

Download LiquidPlanner product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

No data available

Learn More

Atlassian

Video not available

LiquidPlanner

Overview

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

LiquidPlanner is predictive, online project management for modern business. Our software enables people, teams and business leaders to plan, manage, collaborate and report on single projects, or an entire portfolio of projects, in real-time. LiquidPlanner’s award-winning and patent-pending predictive scheduling engine calculates project completion dates automatically based on three key factors; priority of work, the effort needed to compete the work, and resource availability. The LiquidPlanner scheduling engine uses this information in conjunction with sophisticated risk assessment modeling to accurately predict when work will be completed with 98 percent accuracy.

For more details visit our website

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

January 2025

Free Report: Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. LiquidPlanner and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. LiquidPlanner report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.