LiveAction LiveNX vs Nagios Core comparison

BlueCat and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. BlueCat is ranked #50 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nagios is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. BlueCat holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,355 Views
983 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,253 Views
3,272 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

LiveAction LiveNX and Nagios Core are network monitoring competitors. LiveAction LiveNX appears to lead in real-time visualization and advanced analytics.

Features: LiveAction LiveNX offers comprehensive network analytics with traffic segmentation, intuitive visualization tools, and application performance monitoring. Nagios Core is valued for its flexibility, open-source nature, and extensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: LiveAction LiveNX could improve in cost accessibility, customization options, and support for non-visual functions. Nagios Core may enhance user interface aesthetics, initial deployment complexity, and its learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveAction LiveNX is known for streamlined deployment and strong support, suitable for enterprises. Nagios Core, although complex due to its open-source model, allows significant customization and has support via its large community.

Pricing and ROI: LiveAction LiveNX involves higher initial setup costs but promises high ROI with its analytics and support. Nagios Core, being open-source with lower setup costs, offers good ROI through flexibility and community support, despite potential higher long-term maintenance.

To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

50th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.0%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Doshi

IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support

Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"Alert calls occur anytime a service goes down or a matrix is difficult and that helps us to quickly restore service and transfer work."

"Key features include the GUI interface, its notification capabilities, and the real-time reporting."

"Our customers like that Nagios Core is an open source solution. It can be customized to our customers' specific needs."

"The reporting structure and the feature set are valuable to me."

"The most valuable feature of Nagios Core is it allows us to develop and add as many plugins as we want."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it offers proper alerting capabilities."

"It has made the life of the network operations staff more proactive in managing the resources of the infrastructure. It prevents disasters long before they can take place."

"The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"Nagios Core does not have a graphic display."

"Nagios Core is limited in terms of distributed setups, and there is no central view for remote data centers."

"Making it a little easier to configure and set up from the start would help. There are multiple layers that you have to wade through to be able to set it up, to do it the right way, and to get it to do what you want it to do."

"Would benefit from aggregations if a particular server goes down."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

"The user interface could be more interactive because it is pretty basic."

"The mapping is a little hard."

"It would be nice if the company offered a sales or contract manager that was dedicated to our company so that we would have some sort of link to Nagios, and if we had issues or questions, we'd be able to contact them directly."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"It's free."

"We are using the free version."

"Nagios Core is free to use."

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 23% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 16% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 8% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 26% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 18% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 14% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 8% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

April 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Also Known As

LiveNX

No data available

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Free Report: LiveAction LiveNX vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction LiveNX vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LiveAction LiveNX vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.