Looker vs QlikView comparison

Google and Qlik are both solutions in the Embedded BI category. Google is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qlik is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 9.0% mindshare in EBT, compared to Qlik’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Looker

Read 19 Looker reviews

1,652 Views
1,338 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 161 QlikView reviews

954 Views
833 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Looker

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Looker and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Embedded BI solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Looker vs. QlikView Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Looker vs. QlikView

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,431 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Looker

Ranking in Embedded BI

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QlikView

Ranking in Embedded BI

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

161

Ranking in other categories

Reporting (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Embedded BI category, the mindshare of Looker is 9.0%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 8.9%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Embedded BI

Featured Reviews

Kishore Jhunjhunwala

Sr Analytics Consultant at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

A cloud solution for operational reporting but is expensive

Some basic feature that is available in other reporting tools is missing. Looker has the ability to show more than 5,000 rows for operational reporting. Some reporting tools allow users to scroll down to see more than 5,000 rows, but in Looker, you have to download the entire dataset. Looker should consider adding a scroll-down option to allow users to view large datasets on screen without downloading them. Looker has some options for granting users access as viewers. However, viewers cannot download the entire dataset. Only superusers can download the whole dataset on the Explore screen. This is a big limitation, as you cannot give any user viewer access. You can give access to superuser access, which is a cost to the company.

Read full review

Arjun Meda

Assistant Vice President at HSBC India

Useful for data visualization and business intelligence

Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView used to be a way more customizable tool than Qlik Sense is in the present time. Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times. Hiding off the apps in the app overview tab based on the access was a really good feature that needs to be introduced back in the product since I see that, at the moment, there are multiple groups on the tool, owing to which multiple changes on the QMC part is required to handle the solution. Only the person with access to the dashboard in QlikView could have a link to the dashboard through QlikView's hub or access points. With Qlik Sense, one can see whatever is available in the stream. If a user wants to control everything in the product, then there is no need to make multiple changes in the QMC at the individual app level. The aforementioned area can be considered to improve Qlik Sense.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can centralize all our data models."

"Looker allows you to generate the most optimal SQL queries in a DC through UI actions. We had signed a contract with Google Cloud to use BigQuery. That was the primary reason we adopted Looker. It works better with BigQuery than any other BI platform. We also like how this tool was developed. It was designed with an eye toward microservices architecture."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. I didn't face any issues with stability."

"It's quite effortless to navigate through various applications and review their updated data in real-time."

"With Looker, I have experienced benefits in terms of usability and shareability."

"The stability of Looker has been good since I have been using it. However, it depends on what components are being used."

"The product is easy to use."

"It is a pretty stable solution because it is a cloud-based product."

More Looker pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"I had the option to prepare data myself instead of always having to depend on the data team."

"The in-memory feature gives us better insight. It's also easy to drill down into the information and select information."

"A well designed app brings freedom of inquiry to meetings, allowing me to answer questions in real time and this has transformed progress and outputs of our monthly group meeting."

"It has user-friendly data visualization features, supporting our decision-making process with its business intelligence capabilities"

"It enables us to configure various elements, such as dashboard settings, including factors like color schemes and other customization parameters."

"The most valuable aspect is its extensive library on Microsoft, providing a robust framework for implementation."

"It's incredibly fast and can handle large volumes of data without slowing down our operations."

More QlikView pros

Cons

"Stability needs improvement."

"The main area of concern in Looker is probably related to blending the data from the different sources, including the data present internally in the company and on the cloud."

"Integrations with other BI tools could be better."

"The integration with different databases must be improved."

"The product does not have documented material."

"It needs to be more user-friendly."

"The visualization capability of the product is limited."

"Looker doesn't connect to Excel, which is a huge disappointment because a lot of data is presented in Excel. Also, it can't consume data directly from REST APIs, which is necessary. Looker needs to expand its horizons when it comes to data sources. The inability to connect to different data sources is hampering our use cases. Currently, it only has an ODBC connection that connects to a database. It needs to connect to other data sources, such as Excel, APIs, and different platforms."

"Although Qliktech's road map clearly states that QlikView has a long way to go, most of the R&D effort seems to be benefiting Qlik Sense."

"They should offer the capability to directly access data from SaaS environments, as it would simplify the migration process, and while it may seem like a minor enhancement, it would be beneficial to our clients."

"Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times."

"I really wish the application was easier to use in the development phase."

"QlikView's UI could be more user-friendly."

"QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes."

"Better source data connectors."

"Sometimes, dealing with complex reports requires more effort, which could be really improved."

More QlikView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not have to make any payments to use the solution."

"The price of Looker usually depends on the solution's provider, but it is usually cheaper than the other products in the market. Looker is offered at different prices for different companies."

"Looker is expensive and could be made better by reducing it."

"It's not cheap, but it's not expensive for big companies."

"It is cheap."

"It is expensive for small companies."

"It's reasonably priced and falls on the more affordable side."

"QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."

"It has an annual license. It is expensive as compared to other competitive tools that do more for less. In South African rands, we pay about 100,000 to 200,000 a year."

"QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."

"It is not very expensive. I think it it is on par with other similar products on the market."

"Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."

More QlikView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded BI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head at NVidia

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

36%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Looker?

With Looker, I have experienced benefits in terms of usability and shareability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Looker?

I do not have to make any payments to use the solution. In the beginning, Looker may work fine for its users. If advanced users who have experience with BI tools use Looker, then they may find it t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Looker?

The visualization capability of the product is limited. From an improvement perspective, the product should have more visualization capability. I can't clean data in Looker, and if I try to do it, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

Qlik Sense's licensing metrics are flexible. They provide packages based on needs, like named licenses, developer licenses, or shared pool licenses. There is also a core-based license option for or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes. Qlik Sense offers a more modern approach with self-service features, allowing users to build dashb...

See all answers

Comparisons

Databricks vs Looker

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs Looker

Compared 17% of the time

Tableau vs Looker

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Looker

Compared 8% of the time

Sisense vs Looker

Compared 2% of the time

More Looker Competitors

Tableau vs QlikView

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 14% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs QlikView

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Crystal Reports vs QlikView

Compared 2% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Looker

March 2025

Download Looker product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

February 2025

Download QlikView product report

Overview

Looker is a powerful data analytics platform that empowers businesses to explore and analyze their data in real time.

With its intuitive interface and robust features, Looker enables users to easily create and share interactive dashboards, reports, and visualizations.

The product's advanced data modeling capabilities and seamless integration with popular data sources make it a top choice for organizations looking to gain valuable insights from their data.

Google

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Yahoo!, Etsy, Kohler, Hipcamp, Hubspot, Kickstarter, Venmo, Dollar Shave Club, 600+ customer

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

Looker vs. QlikView

January 2025

Free Report: Looker vs. QlikView

Find out what your peers are saying about Looker vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Looker vs. QlikView report.

See our list of best Embedded BI vendors.

We monitor all Embedded BI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.