McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention comparison

The compared McAfee and Trend Micro solutions aren't in the same category. McAfee is ranked #8 in SOAR , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. Trend Micro is ranked #14 in DLP , with an average rating of 7.4, and holds a 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 40 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

1,064 Views
239 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Trend Micro Integrated Data...

Read 16 Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention reviews

1,802 Views
561 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Trend Micro Integrated Data...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2020).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

March 2020

Download the complete report

Helped 841,431 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (8th)

Trend Micro Integrated Data...

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is designed for Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, down 0.8% compared to last year.
Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 1.6% mindshare, down 2.2% since last year.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

DavidJones7

Head of Content at Pharmaflow

Offers automation alert features with easy integrations and impressive scalability

I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. There are a few technical challenges with the deployment, but it can easily solved by an experienced professional but not by a beginner user of the tool. The complete implementation and migration to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator will take around three months. If someone is using a software platform already with implemented use cases in their environment, it might be difficult to implement the same use cases when the customer is migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. The conditions and prior alert settings needs to be accurate when migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, otherwise false positive alerts might get generated.

Read full review

Vikas Saxena

Information Technology Manager at BCML

Email scanning and keyword monitoring improve compliance with data policies

Trend Micro DLP allows me to scan and monitor emails for specific words, ensuring compliance with data loss prevention policies. The DLP system captures keywords from email headers and subjects, and if those words are present, the DLP system operates accordingly. I also use DLP for monitoring data at rest, data in transit, and external devices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The DLP feature in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is good."

"The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"We get fewer false positives than with other solutions."

"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats."

"Application control and traffic encryption are the most valuable features."

"Technical support is very helpful."

"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

"The policy auditing, policy management, and device auditing are all valuable features. Our customers appreciated the ability to get alerts to system-wide events from a single view."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

"The interface and dashboard are okay."

"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

"It is a scalable product."

"We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console."

"We find the malware scanning and intrusion detection most valuable for our server management requirements. We can find out who is on our servers and what they have done."

"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."

"The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features."

"There are no issues with the interface."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"The installation process is quite difficult and requires technical support."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service."

"We would like to see more integration with different platforms and extend this to other platforms. We are migrating to the cloud and want to extend it from our on-premises setup to the cloud."

"There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS."

"The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this."

"The issues with the integration capabilities of the product, specifically the ones that are deployed on an on-premises model, need to be improved."

"The areas of concern where improvements are needed are related to the product's assignment policy and tag assignment, where users can assign the policies with the help of tags and sort out the systems."

"As for improvements, I think that putting everything on a cloud and one console would be a great idea and would be useful for customers."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

"Needs a remote login option."

"There is a need for more predefined templates in the DLP tool."

"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."

"The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved."

"There is a need for more predefined templates in the DLP tool."

"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently."

"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."

"Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is buggy, which is one area for improvement. I also found Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention support horrible, so that's another area for improvement."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."

"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high."

"There is a license required to use this solution. If we use the additional components, such as DLP encryption, there is an additional cost. However, it is similar to a separate product altogether. If you want to use that or not, it is optional, but when you use it, it will cost you additional pricing."

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"$The price of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is expensive, it is approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per license annually."

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is a cheaply priced product, meaning it is not expensive since McAfee provides a free version of ePO, which includes phone support as well."

"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

"The product is worth the money you pay for it. It is not an expensive solution."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"The licensing and pricing of Trend Micro are comparatively low and competitive since they are offered in a bundle, especially compared to Symantec, which was has a relatively high price."

"The platform is expensive. We purchase its yearly license."

"The client needs to pay for the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention license on an annual basis."

"Price-wise, it is a cheap solution. I rate the solution's pricing a two on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."

"Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is expensive compared to other solutions."

"It's not too expensive, especially when compared to SecureTech, and Forcepoint. It's actually cheaper. A license costs about INR 4,000 to INR 5,000, roughly $60 per license per year. In comparison, Forcepoint licenses are around $90 to $95."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator?

I like the solution's feasibility. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is also better and easier to use than other ePOs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator?

The installation process is quite difficult and requires technical support.

See all answers

What do you like most about Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention?

Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is a reliable product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention?

The platform is expensive. We purchase its yearly license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention?

They could improve the product's data loss policies.

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 54% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 46% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

Compared 56% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

Compared 23% of the time

Safetica ONE vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

Compared 12% of the time

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

February 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

February 2025

Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report

Download Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention

Overview

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Now more than ever, your data is on the move—whether it’s on a laptop, flash drive, or moving across physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures. At any point along the way, your financial data, customer information, intellectual property, or trade secrets could be lost or stolen. Securing this data is further complicated by several growing risk factors:

Rapidly evolving compliance regulations and mandates, including GDPR
Continued growth of workforce mobility
Employees using their own mobile devices and consumer apps for work
Rising frequency of advanced persistent threats (APTs) and data breach incidents

To avoid the embarrassment, reputation damage, regulatory fines, and revenue loss, today’s enterprise must be able to identify, track, and secure all confidential data from multiple points within the organisation and in the cloud without impacting employee productivity and performance. In the past, many organisations tried traditional data loss prevention (DLP) solutions but found they were too intrusive, too complex to manage, and too costly to acquire, deploy, and maintain.

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Excite Japan, MEDHOST, United Way of Greater Atlanta, University of Florida at Shands

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

March 2020

Free Report: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.