McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix comparison

The compared McAfee and Zix solutions aren't in the same category. McAfee is ranked #12 in SOAR , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. Zix is ranked #14 in SEG , and holds a 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zix users who would recommend it.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 40 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

988 Views
222 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Webroot Advanced Email Encr...

Read 1 Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix review

110 Views
81 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Webroot Advanced Email Encr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR).

To learn more, read our detailed Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (12th)

Webroot Advanced Email Encr...

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is designed for Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, down 0.8% compared to last year.
Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix, on the other hand, focuses on Secure Email Gateway (SEG), holds 1.3% mindshare, down 2.2% since last year.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Featured Reviews

DavidJones7

Head of Content at Pharmaflow

Offers automation alert features with easy integrations and impressive scalability

I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. There are a few technical challenges with the deployment, but it can easily solved by an experienced professional but not by a beginner user of the tool. The complete implementation and migration to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator will take around three months. If someone is using a software platform already with implemented use cases in their environment, it might be difficult to implement the same use cases when the customer is migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. The conditions and prior alert settings needs to be accurate when migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, otherwise false positive alerts might get generated.

Read full review

John Zupancic

Vice President / Branch Manager / Senior Technician at Aperion Information Technologies, Inc.

Inexpensive, with good email security, but the technical support could be improved

We don't have as many problems with email security. They have some areas that could be improved. For example, we also use this solution for email encryption, which was clunky and could be improved, but the email security itself has been excellent. The web interface works well but the Outlook plug-in has been problematic. We've had to uninstall/reinstall it. On some Outlook clients (including mine), it causes Outlook to stop responding. I disabled the Outlook plug-in and only use the web interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

"Application control and traffic encryption are the most valuable features."

"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."

"The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect."

"I really like the auditing component because it really looks at exactly what has happened on the network."

"The valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the management of the policies."

"The DLP feature in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is good."

"The initial setup is very easy."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

"They do a better job of determining what's real and what's not than most of the other solutions we have tried, and it's been very painless to use."

Cons

"It's a little bit complex to configure it, but when you start using it, it is much easier. There are many policies that you need to create, and in three or four places"

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade its technology since the solution's EDR function is not good compared to other vendors in the market."

"The solution sometimes has some false positives on IP addresses, from the web control aspect of the product. This needs to be improved."

"There are some issues relating to the automation of reports. That's why I wanted the DLP reports. There are some problems in this area. Sometimes it does not work even though all the configuration words are right. There are also some problems with automatic updates."

"The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives."

"One thing that I don't like is that McAfee products change very often and upgrade very often."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service."

"McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

"They have some areas that could be improved. For example, we also use this solution for email encryption, which was clunky and could be improved, but the email security itself has been excellent."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"It's an expensive solution"

"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

"In terms of pricing, I believe they provide excellent value."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Non Profit

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION ePO?

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION ePO?

It's an expensive solution.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 52% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 48% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix

Compared 100% of the time

More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

March 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

March 2025

Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix report

Download Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix product report

Also Known As

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

Zix Email Encryption, ZixEncrypt

Overview

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Proven Content Filters

To send an encrypted email, your employees simply create a message and hit ‘send'. Our content filters take care of the rest.

Transparent Delivery

When your employees receive an encrypted reply, the experience is just as easy. They simply open the encrypted email like regular email. No matter where they are or what device they use, if your customers and partners have email, they can easily receive encrypted email.

Convenient Recipient Experience

Our patented Best Method of Delivery ensures all messages are delivered in the most secure and easy manner possible, including transparent, pull and push methods. For pull delivery, secure web portals can be in the cloud or on-site. Also among our robust methods is secure PDF for statement delivery.

Simplified Quarantined Messages

If an email is quarantined, then employees, managers and IT receive notification to view the message and policy violations and can delete the email, or justify and release it for delivery.

Zix

Sample Customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Erie County of Pennsylvania’s Human Services Department, Justice Federal Credit Union, STAR Financial Group, Chisago County, Minn., The National Banks of Central Texas, Kentucky Retirement Systems (KRS), Frankfort, Ky, Athletico Physical Therapy, District of Columbia Retirement Board (DCRB), CIBM Bank

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.