Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MEGA HOPEX vs OneTrust GRC comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MEGA HOPEX
Ranking in GRC
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (4th), Business Process Design (7th)
OneTrust GRC
Ranking in GRC
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of MEGA HOPEX is 1.4%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneTrust GRC is 8.6%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC
 

Featured Reviews

Navi Thejesh - PeerSpot reviewer
Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity
The latest version is HOPEX WiFi. HOPEX can be on the cloud and accessed from anywhere within the given access network area. It is very interactive. We can do things from anywhere, and all the applications will work as specified. We can generate documents and can publish the documents. We can create a data match and visualize graphs and everything. Everything can be generated from the web interface itself. It has good functionality. We can develop our own customizations and meta models to define requirements, in-house business functions, and requirements. MEGA is already defined by global standards. A company can adapt to global standards and work in such a way to design its own methodology to define its structure. The interface is very good.
Gerald Pegg - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamlined incident management with user-friendly automation tools and responsive support
I use OneTrust specifically for incident management. For my company, I helped to create the incident management program that we currently use, particularly with gathering the information and sending out assessments to different vendors to collect information for further research and discovery.  I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"It is very interactive."
"Customer support is fantastic. They are very helpful whenever we get on the line with the support team."
"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."
"What's most valuable in MEGA HOPEX is that it follows the reference model where each component is defined. I also like the diagram consistency in MEGA HOPEX."
"MEGA HOPEX helps me to see the benefits of different solutions in terms of the entire ecosystem I have, by providing different integrations and overseeing the entire system."
"You do not need to be a professional of enterprise modeling to contribute to the enrichment and improvement of the enterprise repository."
"I find the process modeling and value chain features valuable. The application portfolio management functionality and workflow management capabilities are also nice. It provides a holistic view for stakeholders and helps align IT with business strategies. It facilitates collaboration across the organization and covers all domains, including business, applications, technology, and data."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it already has visibility about all the data protection regulations or other cybersecurity regulations related to several countries"
"The platform is especially useful in startup environments where we're typically starting from scratch."
"We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"The privacy impact assessment automation tool and the incident management tool are very user-friendly."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"OneTrust GRC offers policy management, including documentation, distribution, attestation, and policy management."
 

Cons

"MEGA HOPEX's problem is that it is expensive, but it's a fantastic tool."
"I would like to see more regular updates released."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"The tool's UI should be more user-friendly."
"There is still room for improvement in MEGA HOPEX in my field of work. Some aspects are not working efficiently."
"The product must improve integration with other tools."
"It has a data domain where we load our data objects onto the tool but doesn't provide data governance capabilities such as cleansing or validating data."
"MEGA HOPEX's initial setup could be easier. The newer version is better but they still need to improve the process. The deployment took approximately four to eight hours."
"They could enhance the product's functionalities like audit management and ensure consistency across modules."
"The implementation of OneTrust could have been smoother, particularly in terms of scoping for those outside of governance, risk, and compliance."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"I wish there were more customization options, particularly within the privacy rights automation module."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you want to use additional features, such as the Risk Management capability, then it is a little too expensive."
"The product has a high cost."
"The price of the support depends on the vendors that are reselling this module or the MEGA HOPEX version 5. We are on premium support and are their only partners in the GCC, we have a premium support contract with them. The support we have is not with the client. The client does not bear the cost, it's us who bear the cost."
"It is very expensive."
"The price of the MEGA HOPEX license could improve, it is expensive. The license key for business process analysis and IT architecture is approximately €10,000. This price is fixed, it's not a subscription or cloud-based version. It is a one-time price."
"MEGA HOPEX's licensing costs are yearly."
"The pricing depends on the number of licenses purchased."
"The product is reasonably priced for the value it offers. There's a good balance between cost and features."
"OneTrust GRC's licensing costs about $15,000 per module."
"The platform is expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"OneTrust GRC is an expensive solution."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is too expensive, I rate the solution a seven since it falls under the pricey side."
"I found the pricing and setup cost very reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
44%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
6%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?
Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...
What do you like most about OneTrust GRC?
We have data from Jira regarding addiction related to Europe as well as California. Additionally, we have data related to the Indian Data Protection Bill. Therefore, GDPR compliance is highly benef...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneTrust GRC?
I don't have specifics on pricing. I know it's not very cheap, but the budget aspect is outside my wheelhouse.
What needs improvement with OneTrust GRC?
I wish there were more customization options, particularly within the privacy rights automation module. More customization on the backend would allow for adjusting specific category labels tailored...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
OneTrust Vendor Risk Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aetna, Fannie Mae, M&T Bank, Glatfelter Insurance Group, Zions Management Services Company, The College Board, Baxter Credit Union, AXA Financial, Missouri Department of Conservation, New York State OTDA, MEG Energy Corp, Walgreens, Procter & Gamble, Biogen Idec, Gilead Sciences, Organic Valley, Trinity Health, Nissan and Ford
randstand, into, halfbrick
Find out what your peers are saying about MEGA HOPEX vs. OneTrust GRC and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.