Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Meraki MX vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Meraki MX reduces costs and management time while enhancing network efficiency and long-term cost-effectiveness despite initial high expenses.
Sentiment score
7.4
Palo Alto Networks WildFire provides rapid ROI with affordable, real-time threat prevention, reducing costs and enhancing centralized threat management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Meraki MX's customer service is praised for 24/7 availability and efficiency, despite occasional delays and varying expertise levels.
Sentiment score
7.5
Palo Alto Networks WildFire customer service is praised for expertise but criticized for slow regional responses and handling critical cases.
There is a lack of SLA adherence, and third-party partners do not provide prompt responses.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Meraki MX offers scalable solutions for various needs, efficiently supporting from small to enterprise operations despite some hardware limits.
Sentiment score
8.0
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is praised for its scalability, adaptability, and versatility in diverse environments and network sizes.
Wildfire is highly scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Meraki MX is stable, excels in harsh environments, but faces occasional feature issues and sporadic reboots, mostly rated highly.
Sentiment score
8.4
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is praised for its stability, reliability, seamless integration, and superior threat handling performance.
 

Room For Improvement

Meraki MX needs improved features, lower costs, more security, better integration, enhanced management, and combined platform functionalities.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire needs enhanced protocol inspection, better integration, improved threat intelligence, intuitive interface, and automation with AI.
The dashboard should provide better visibility, especially in showing how many files are sent to Wildfire and their findings.
 

Setup Cost

Meraki MX pricing is high but valued for ease of use and features, with flexible licenses and negotiable discounts.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is costly but valued for strong threat detection, with pricing varying by features and region.
 

Valuable Features

Meraki MX provides user-friendly, cloud-managed network security with features like AutoVPN, SD-WAN, traffic shaping, and automatic updates.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire offers robust malware protection with sandboxing, threat detection, real-time updates, and seamless Palo Alto integration.
The most valuable feature of Wildfire is its sandboxing capability for examining suspicious files or locations.
 

Categories and Ranking

Meraki MX
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Unified Threat Management (UTM) (3rd)
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Meraki MX is designed for Unified Threat Management (UTM) and holds a mindshare of 18.7%, down 19.4% compared to last year.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire, on the other hand, focuses on Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), holds 12.7% mindshare, up 11.7% since last year.
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

Mike Cote - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to manage and dashboard allows us to see and manage customers
The solution's most valuable feature is the Meraki dashboard, which is a single pane of glass. The dashboard allows us to see and manage all our Meraki customers. Since it's cloud-based management, we can remotely support Meraki, which makes it easy for us. We like to sell and deploy Meraki MX because of the ease of management.
Mario Lacroix - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides seamless automation functionality and has a straightforward setup process
The platform's most valuable feature is its seamless automation within the broader Palo Alto ecosystem. Its ability to function autonomously, with automatic updates and integration with tools like Panorama, significantly reduces manual intervention. Additionally, its threat detection capabilities allow us to respond quickly to potential incidents, and the system is self-sufficient, managing itself once configured.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user206346 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2015
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto Networks
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto: Management Goodies You often have comparisons of both firewalls concerning security components. Of course, a firewall must block attacks, scan for viruses, build VPNs, etc. However, in this post I am discussing the advantages and disadvantages from both vendors concerning…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
27%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
4%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Fortigate 60d vs. Meraki MX67 for a small company without a dedicated IT Department
We have Meraki Mx devices now, we are looking to replace them. But that is because the Meraki MX platform lacks SSL Inspection, Granular Firewall rules (Block only, no allow setting), client vpn re...
Which is better - Meraki MX or Cisco ASA Firewall?
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked t...
What do you like most about Meraki MX?
I am happy with the technical support for the solution. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten.
How does Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks Wildfire?
The Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is a very powerful and very complex piece of anti-viral software. When one considers that fact, it is all the more impressive that the setup is a fairly straightf...
Which is better - Wildfire or FortiGate?
FortiGate has a lot going for it and I consider it to be the best, most user-friendly firewall out there. What I like the most about it is that it has an attractive web dashboard with very easy nav...
How does Cisco ASA Firewall compare with Palo Alto's WildFire?
When looking to change our ASA Firewall, we looked into Palo Alto’s WildFire. It works especially in preventing advanced malware and zero-day exploits with real-time intelligence. The sandbox featu...
 

Also Known As

MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hyatt, ONS
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Software Technologies, Sophos, Cisco and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.