Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Platform Cloud Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the API Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.8. Microsoft holds a 19.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to Oracle’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 80 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

25,594 Views
21,392 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle API Platform Cloud S...

Read 8 Oracle API Platform Cloud Service reviews

972 Views
759 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

Oracle API Platform Cloud S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and Oracle API Platform Cloud Service are competitive solutions in the API management domain. Microsoft Azure API Management tends to lead in integration flexibility and scalability, which is crucial for enterprise needs.

Features: Azure API Management shines with its seamless integration into Microsoft environments, robust security features like multifactor authentication, and comprehensive monitoring and analytics capabilities. Meanwhile, Oracle offers rich customization, strong analytics, and a wide-ranging hybrid deployment model with flexible architecture supporting multiple environments.

Room for Improvement: Azure could enhance its capabilities by providing more intuitive user management and expanding its customization options. Oracle could improve by streamlining its somewhat complex UI and deployment process and reducing its overall heaviness to match competitor efficiency levels.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure offers a straightforward deployment process, well-documented resources, and strong technical support tailored for fast implementation. Oracle provides an adaptive deployment model with excellent customer service, which is beneficial for highly customized solutions needing specific attention.

Pricing and ROI: Azure offers competitive pricing with solid ROI attributable to its efficient scalability and integration. Oracle's initial costs may be higher, yet its advanced features and rich analytics capabilities ensure substantial returns for organizations with specialized needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Platform Cloud Service Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,004 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle API Platform Cloud S...

Ranking in API Management

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 19.1%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle API Platform Cloud Service is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian

Specialist PCC at Danfoss

Efficiently manages and monetizes API

It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.

Read full review

Mahaboob Pasha

Solutions Architect at Truglobal

Secure and simplify API management with effective deployment options

In our organization, we use Oracle API Platform Cloud Service primarily to host and manage our middleware APIs. Our middleware APIs are registered on this platform and exposed to a fixed domain, which supports our organizational goals effectively Since our enterprise has many APIs, Oracle API…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Azure API Management has many valuable features. One is the developer portal, that's very useful for teams. The tool also provides layers of security. I also found the caching, automatic documentation, and version management functionalities most valuable."

"The tool helps to manage APIs."

"It's really easy to use for simple passthrough APIs."

"It seems quite good so far. It handles our current workload well, and I'm optimistic it can scale effectively as our needs grow."

"The Application Gateway we have found to be the most useful in Microsoft Azure API Management. We have integrated the Microsoft Azure API Management with Application Gateway. Application Gateway is a type of load balancer that we are using for the high availability of our API calls."

"It's easier to use and has more features than Google."

"The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges."

"Monitoring: It gives us a detailed overview of how clients are using the API and it allows us to see the consumption trends in real-time."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"All API usage is now governed and tracked."

"I find the customizable dashboards convenient. When you have a privatized dashboard, it's easy to log in, get an immediate snapshot of what's happening, and quickly address any problems."

"The Gateways are communicating with a Management Service, which lives in the Cloud, to send usage information or to fetch changes for the deployed APIs."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable features are the easy integration with the Oracle cloud, and that it's easy to use."

"The security mode and the deployment process are significant assets, offering simplified deployment and effective troubleshooting options, including Docker support."

"Oracle API Platform Cloud Service's UI is quite user-friendly and supports a hybrid deployment model."

"Oracle's APIP CS is a platform capable for consistently covering the complete API Lifecycle from design to retirement, supporting an API-first approach."

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with other platforms, as well as increased security."

"The developer console for external users could be improved, especially in the testing site."

"Expansion to global regions is a point for improvement, as licensing is costly."

"Sometimes when immediate support is required, it isn't available."

"Technical support could be more helpful and responsive."

"The solution’s security and performance could be improved."

"Azure is our most expensive resource; it's costly."

"The user interface needs improvement."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"There should be closer integration between the API Platform Cloud Service and the Identity Cloud Service to allow IDCS Applications, protecting backend systems, to be linked to the API Applications that consumers use to access APIs."

"Oracle API Platform Cloud Service provides an API documentation tool, which is quite outdated."

"Even when an API is functioning correctly, there seems to be a glitch within OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure)."

"The solution's cost in terms of scaling could be better."

"In future updates, we might be interested to see more enhancements after exploring the existing features over the next year."

"In the next release, I would like to see more security policies and for it to include an on-cloud gateway."

"I would like to see enhanced support for SOAP Service and the corresponding WS-Security policies."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would describe the tool's price as being in the mid-range category."

"There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees."

"Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions."

"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure API Management is publicly available and goes from a developer edition that costs $26 to $30 per month. It may have changed, but it's in the neighborhood of $30 per month. I believe there's also the enterprise edition, which is highly capable and costs $2,500 per month."

"It's free for less than ten users. If you want to go beyond that, it's around $3.50 per user per month. If you want a DevOps integration, it's about $7.50 per user per month. Costs depend on the size, complexity, usage, and what facility you want to integrate. So, we use Microsoft Azure and have the entire DevOps and Visual Studio on the cloud. We get all three flavors for $7.50 per user per month."

"It's being paid monthly."

"It is an expensive solution, but any API solution will be expensive."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is for each logical gateway (a logical gateway can have multiple physical nodes)."

"The solution is expensive to scale."

"Pricing depends on the specific services used."

"Oracle API Platform Cloud Service is a cheap solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle API Platform Cloud Service?

I find the customizable dashboards convenient. When you have a privatized dashboard, it's easy to log in, get an immediate snapshot of what's happening, and quickly address any problems.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle API Platform Cloud Service?

The pricing and licensing are considered competitive, especially since our enterprise uses multiple Oracle products, which makes the integration seamless and cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle API Platform Cloud Service?

Currently, there is nothing in particular that we feel needs improvement. However, in future updates, we might be interested to see more enhancements after exploring the existing features over the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 44% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 23% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Apigee vs Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

Compared 27% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

Compared 16% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

Compared 12% of the time

Apiary vs Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle API Platform Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

February 2025

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

February 2025

Oracle API Platform Cloud Service report

Download Oracle API Platform Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

Oracle API Platform Cloud Service enables companies to thrive in the digital economy by comprehensively managing the full API lifecycle from design and standardization to documenting, publishing, testing and managing APIs. These tools provide API developers, managers, and users an end-to-end platform for designing, prototyping. Through the platform, users gain the agility needed to support changing business demands and opportunities, while having clear visibility into who is using APIs for better control, security and monetization of digital assets.

Oracle

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

API Matic, Trunk Club

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

January 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Platform Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Platform Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Platform Cloud Service report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.