Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs SonicWall Netextender comparison

Microsoft and SonicWall are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while SonicWall is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 4.8% mindshare in EIV, compared to SonicWall’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 70% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Read 27 Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway reviews

3,040 Views
3,010 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SonicWall Netextender

Read 14 SonicWall Netextender reviews

2,555 Views
2,555 Comparison Views

70% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

SonicWall Netextender

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

SonicWall Netextender and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway are competing products in the VPN market. SonicWall Netextender offers better pricing and customer support, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is preferred for its comprehensive features and perceived better value.

Features: SonicWall Netextender is praised for its robust security features, straightforward connectivity options, and user-friendly interface. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is highlighted for its broader integration capabilities, scalability, and advanced feature set, making it suitable for larger enterprises.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall Netextender users mention occasional connectivity drop-offs, an outdated interface, and limited scalability. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway users report complexity in configuration, management challenges, and a steep learning curve as primary areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Netextender is noted for its quick setup and highly responsive customer service. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway's deployment is seen as more complex but well-documented. Azure's customer service is satisfactory yet not as quick to respond.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Netextender has lower initial setup costs and faster ROI, appealing to smaller businesses or those with budget constraints. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is more expensive but offers higher scalability and advanced features, leading to potentially higher long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. SonicWall Netextender Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. SonicWall Netextender

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall Netextender

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is 4.8%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Netextender is 3.1%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway	4.8%
SonicWall Netextender	3.1%
Other	92.1%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

Mano Senaratne

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

Achieve seamless integration and fortified security while benefiting from a comprehensive suite of features

In Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, there aren't too many areas for improvement, but the configuration part might be a little tricky. It took some time to get things to work, but once figured out, it becomes much easier. The documentation could use some improvement, particularly regarding point-to-site system setup with on-premise systems. Other than that, it's seamless, and you can connect things across regions. Regarding integration with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, we use Function Apps to create the integrations and Data Factory. All our data pipelines are written in Python, hosted within an Azure Data Factory or a Function App. This makes configuration easier and allows pipeline monitoring and creating integrations between different systems. We've created multiple integrations between SharePoint and our data warehouse, HubSpot and our data warehouse, and several other tools.

Read full review

Rich Darress

Chief Operating Officer at Darress Tech

Has provided secure remote access to multiple client networks with consistent performance

When buying the appliance itself, there is one downside that isn't exclusive to SonicWall. When you apply all the security settings, many people have one gig connections for internet ISP. If you're bringing in a one gig connection, you have to have a more robust SonicWall to handle that throughput with all your security settings turned on. It gets pretty pricey upfront if you're bringing in a one gig connection. If the customer starts with a two, three, four, or 500 meg connection and has a small unit, they have to replace the whole box when upgrading to a gig, so scalability there is atrocious. However, this issue exists with pretty much any appliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is scalable and depends on your chosen network bandwidth."

"Security is the first feature in Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway because we don't have to go through the public internet to access things."

"The solution is very quick to connect."

"I rate the product ten out of ten."

"One of the most valuable features is its support for various protocols, including BGP, which helps in making more secure connections."

"I like the stability, HA, and performance of the product."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway pros

"The product has two-factor authentication."

"The solution provides high availability."

"Employees can have access to the network from home."

"NetExtender works very well. I never had an issue with it, and it has been working well for me. In terms of management, you have good control over the destination. You can use NetExtender to set the policy and the static route for a client. You can modify it based on what your client needs or can access. You have good control over routing."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"One of the most valuable features of SonicWall Netextender is the integration of VPN accounts with Microsoft Identity Management, which enables us to enforce secure access through Microsoft Intune and conditional access policies. This helps ensure that only authorized individuals are able to access the VPN, rather than anyone with knowledge of a password."

"It can support multifactor authentication. Also, it is a very basic application."

"It allows us to work remotely."

More SonicWall Netextender pros

Cons

"Connectivity could be improved in Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway because it's not as stable, particularly when connecting a device tunnel."

"Microsoft could work on having micro VPNs to integrate with mobile devices."

"Their technical support could be better. If you don't have a support contract, it takes longer."

"The instructions should have been more accessible and less time-consuming to find the best solution tailored for the customer."

"The solution must provide metrics to monitor the inbound and outbound traffic easily."

"The marketing material in the portal is not very user-friendly."

"They should release a less expensive version of the solution."

"There is a need to improve the paperwork and management approval process, which is currently painful, though not directly related to the VPN Gateway itself."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway cons

"The Netextender application itself doesn't really look pretty, however, we can still use it. We don't care what it looks like. That said, if they did a cosmetic update, that would be fine."

"They need to rewrite the software to make it a usable product."

"Right now, you have to load each license on to an appliance. You can't pool across multiple appliances. So, you end up having to do a lot of administrative work to recover if an internet provider goes down, and you cannot leverage it as easily into a DR solution."

"SonicWall can be difficult for some people, but I don't find it difficult. Some companies provide a VPN client for free, but you have to pay for NetExtender."

"The UI could be a little better."

"If the customer starts with a two, three, four, or 500 meg connection and has a small unit, they have to replace the whole box when upgrading to a gig, so scalability there is atrocious."

"The initial setup of SonicWall Netextender is straightforward. The only issue we encountered was with relocating the VPN appliance. If we needed to move it from an on-premise to an on-cloud architecture, we had to start over and redeploy it from scratch. Unfortunately, it is not portable and any changes to its physical location often result in the need for a fresh deployment to ensure everything functions properly."

"There must be a multi-factor authentication enabled or integrated by default with it in order to be integrated with NetExtender."

More SonicWall Netextender cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I pay the licensing charges associated with the tool on an hourly basis. The tool is affordable."

"There is a monthly license and the price depends on how many users are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The price could be less expensive."

"The cost could be lower."

"It's saved us money compared to getting a third-party appliance."

"The costs are quite high."

"The software has good pricing compared to other vendors."

"It's an expensive product"

"The product costs us $140 to $180 per month."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway pricing and cost advice

"Compared to others, it is cheaper. When we compare it with Palo Alto, Check Point, or Fortinet, it is a little cheaper."

"You have to pay for its license. There are some other companies that provide a VPN client for free. When you buy NetExtender, its license is available for one, three, or five years."

"After a certain number of users, you require extra licensing."

"The solution is cheap itself, not too costly."

"Cost wise, it would be a few hundred dollars for the base appliance with the first five clients. Then from there, your cost per seat depends on how many you're getting. It's a one-time cost, and then you have a few hundred dollars a year for the maintenance contract once you get the one-time seat costs out of the way."

"The price of SonicWall Netextender is reasonable. Whether it's a small shop with only five users or a larger operation with 130 users, we have received no complaints or objections regarding cost from any of the clients we are looking to deploy it with."

"The solution has a pretty good price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

The solution is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway can be improved in security points with stronger encryption. I do not have additional feedback about needed improvements regarding configuration, support, or documentation.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

My advice to others looking into using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is that if you have a specific use case such as site-to-site VPN, then this is a perfect option for you. I rate Microsoft Azure VP...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Netextender?

The pricing for my experience with the setup cost and licensing of SonicWall Netextender is fair. The Netextender itself has no cost. It's the SSL licensing that is attached to the SonicWall. It us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Netextender?

SonicWall Netextender has not helped with compliance, as it is not applicable for what I'm doing. I've put several feature requests in over the years and they've implemented them all, so it current...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SonicWall Netextender?

Getting to local resources on a customer's network is my main use case with SonicWall Netextender or SonicWall SSL-VPN. As a managed service provider, all my customers have SonicWalls and I get int...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenVPN Access Server vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Competitors

OpenVPN Access Server vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 29% of the time

SonicWall Connect Tunnel vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 14% of the time

SonicWall SMA vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 10% of the time

SonicWall Mobile Connect vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 3% of the time

More SonicWall Netextender Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

SonicWall Netextender

January 2026

Download SonicWall Netextender product report

Also Known As

MS Azure VPN Gateway

No data available

Overview

A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.

Microsoft

SonicWall Netextender provides secure remote access, supporting remote work with valuable features like two-factor authentication, low latency, and integration with Microsoft identity management.

SonicWall Netextender facilitates secure client-to-site VPN connections for remote staff, integrating seamlessly with Microsoft identity management and using existing credentials like Active Directory. Its cost-effectiveness and detailed documentation attract enterprises in sectors such as insurance, healthcare, and education. Despite excellent control over routing, the intuitive setup could be improved, with users experiencing performance and licensing flexibility issues, especially with multi-factor authentication. While integration with SAML ensures seamless authentication, high bandwidth consumption and the outdated interface are mentioned for enhancement. Overall, SonicWall Netextender supports remote file transfers and access to Microsoft 365 portals, although additional features like automatic connection on startup and AI integration would address current user demands.

What features does SonicWall Netextender offer?

Remote Work Support: Facilitates secure connections for remote staff
Integration with Microsoft Identity Management: Connects effortlessly using existing credentials
Two-Factor Authentication: Enhances security during remote access
Low Latency and High Stability: Ensures uninterrupted remote connections
Cost-effectiveness: Attracts organizations with budget-friendly options

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Secure Access: Reliable protection for remote file transfers
Ease of Setup: Quick deployment with minimal IT disruption
Flexible Integration: Utilizes existing credentials for seamless user experience
Documentation: Comprehensive guides for efficient setup and use

Enterprises from insurance, healthcare, and education sectors benefit from SonicWall Netextender by enabling secure remote or hybrid work. Companies facilitate efficient management of remote work, providing access to corporate resources from any location. Challenges include the authentication setup, but its support for remote access to Microsoft 365 and secure file transfers offer substantial utility for these industries.

SonicWall

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. SonicWall Netextender

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. SonicWall Netextender

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. SonicWall Netextender and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. SonicWall Netextender report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.