Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Pandora FMS comparison

Microsoft and Pandora FMS are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Pandora FMS is ranked #23. Microsoft holds a 5.2% mindshare in SM, compared to Pandora FMS’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pandora FMS users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 85 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

10,107 Views
1,718 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Pandora FMS

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

1,347 Views
377 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Pandora FMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Pandora FMS compete in the IT management software category. Microsoft Configuration Manager appears to have the upper hand for large enterprise environments due to its integration and scalability within the Microsoft ecosystem, while Pandora FMS offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to diverse environments.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager shines in patch management, software deployment, and integration with other Microsoft products. It is known for its scalability and comprehensive configuration compliance management. Pandora FMS offers an all-in-one monitoring solution with strong WMI integration, lightweight agent deployment, and the ability to manage diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could benefit from enhanced support for non-Windows platforms and better integration with cloud services. Deployment speed and configuration complexity are cited as issues. Pandora FMS could improve by strengthening third-party integration, having a more intuitive UI, and enhancing analytics and automation features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions are primarily deployed on-premises. Microsoft Configuration Manager has extensive online resources and documentation, though tiered support responsiveness can vary. Pandora FMS offers a simpler implementation process with competitive pricing and strong community support, though some users desire faster support responses.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager's enterprise packages are robust but come at a high cost, potentially offset by ROI through automation. Pandora FMS provides attractive pricing, especially in its open-source and Community Editions, seen as a budget-friendly alternative for diverse monitoring tasks while offering significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Pandora FMS

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (1st), Configuration Management (3rd), Patch Management (1st)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Server Monitoring

23rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (74th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (54th), Log Management (57th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 5.2%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Configuration Manager	5.2%
Pandora FMS	1.2%
Other	93.6%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

JunedBedrekar

Expert at Tata Consultancy

Have effectively deployed patches and applications while integrating with cloud solutions

The features I find most valuable in Microsoft Configuration Manager are replication and scripting. If I want to get a fetch report for anything, such as hardware-related issues or group policy-related issues, I need to fetch the report by using SCCM's scripting language and remediation part. The inventory collection features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are good because we always prefer the inventory. We do it by using the script language. We use remote management capabilities in Microsoft Configuration Manager. Remote management capabilities are useful if the user is not providing access; we can use the backend users to update the group policy and sync the devices. These are the main features we require.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."

"Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."

"It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me."

"Overall, I believe Microsoft Configuration Manager is definitely a good product."

"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is very scalable."

"The dashboards have information about our assets."

"Microsoft Configuration Manager is integrated with other Microsoft products."

"The product is suitable for our size, handling 800 devices."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

"We are able to control our business with this all-in-one monitoring tool."

"What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."

"Features I have found most valuable with Pandora are the personalized metrics and the simplicity of data."

"The solution has good dashboards and graphics."

"I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly."

"The network monitoring and configuration within this solution is very good."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"It should provide the ability to remotely connect to mobile devices. There are some solutions that are doing that, but with Microsoft Intune, the only way to remotely connect to devices outside the organization and mobile devices is by using TeamViewer. It is pretty strange for a big company like Microsoft to not have something for that."

"The reporting functionality in Microsoft Configuration Manager could be improved as it is not very user-friendly."

"Initial setup was complex. There's a lot that goes into it."

"Regarding this, I'd like to mention the agent situation. When the agent on an end-user device is not functioning correctly, it can be quite problematic. It would be highly beneficial if there were a self-healing mechanism in place. Essentially, if the agent becomes corrupted or encounters issues, it should be able to rectify itself autonomously. This is particularly critical because, in order to utilize a tool like MECM (assuming you're referring to Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager), we need to deploy agents, known as AsMs, on all the devices we use, such as Windows 10 or Windows Server. Sometimes, when we deploy configurations or updates, they don't apply properly due to agent issues. This issue has been present since we began using MECM around 23 years ago. Unfortunately, there is currently no built-in mechanism for the agent to detect its own problems and initiate self-repair. Microsoft doesn’t have any feature to scan vulnerabilities and hence, they could include those."

"There is a reboot issue with the patching. Sometimes, if patching runs into any issue whatsoever, it doesn't reboot but it doesn't tell you it errored out. It just sits there and we don't find out until the next day whether it patched or not. That was a big issue for us. We're working through that. They added some stuff in there now where you can actually tell reboot is pending. But we still need some kind of notification that if something fails or is pending, we know. We shouldn't have to go in and look. They don't have anything for that right now."

"The database should be made to be more stable and robust, but not so much the configuration."

"The solution is crowded with information."

"There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself. However, it does seem a bit buggy from time to time, based on what I have heard."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"Pandora FMS is an overall great monitoring solution, but it does not have a community that is as large as Zabbix or Nagios."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

"We would like the real-time monitoring of an interface to be improved within this solution."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"Third-party integration should be improved for some commonly used products."

"It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS."

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free."

"Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it."

"The price is competitive and reasonable."

"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."

"The price could be better."

"We have a support license from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager and the overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"As far as I know, it is an annual operating expense license."

"The license price could be reduced for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager They should make the price more affordable for smaller companies, most companies would be able to use the solution if it was priced better. There are more people on this cloud because you don't have to have either a server room or an on-premise server. You can have one IT person handle this without any local infrastructure."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	64

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 12% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 8% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 20% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 15% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmk vs Pandora FMS

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

October 2025

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS

October 2025

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Pandora FMS

September 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Pandora FMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Pandora FMS and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Pandora FMS report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.