Tenable Security Center and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are prominent competitors in the security software category. Based on feature comparisons, Tenable has the upper hand in vulnerability scanning, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in integration with Azure and compliance management.
Features: Tenable Security Center focuses on vulnerability scanning and utilizes Nessus technology for comprehensive asset discovery, customizable scanning policies, and detailed dashboards. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers seamless integration with Azure, providing broad visibility across environments, enhanced compliance management, and valuable security score capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could enhance flexibility in report configuration and integration, as well as improve the speed of scanning. Risk acceptance management could also be streamlined for larger environments. Microsoft Defender for Cloud would benefit from better management of false positive alerts, increased granularity in policy application across subscriptions, and simplified pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center is generally deployed on-premises, which suits organizations preferring local data management. Its technical support is responsive but could benefit from more consistency. Microsoft Defender for Cloud is cloud-based, offering scalability for those utilizing cloud infrastructure. Support is good, but experiences can vary with differences between tier-one and premium levels.
Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center's pricing based on assets can be more expensive than competitors like Rapid7, but it offers adaptable compliance solutions that reduce security breaches and manpower costs, delivering significant ROI. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers flexible pricing options, with a mix of free and paid features, although it may become costly with full feature usage. Its integration with Azure services provides cost-effectiveness for organizations heavily invested in Microsoft ecosystems.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
The biggest return on investment is the rapid improvement of security posture.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
Defender won't replace our endpoint XDR, but it will likely adapt and support any growth in the Microsoft Cloud space.
There might be scalability issues as you scale up to large enterprises.
Scalability is a bit limited with Tenable Security Center.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
I've heard there might be issues with scalability for larger enterprises.
It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys.
The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters.
The product is somewhat pricey, reflecting its valuable features and status as a high-quality solution in the vulnerability management market.
The cost of Tenable Security Center is reasonable for our company.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
Tenable Security Center provides an overall score of vulnerabilities, comparing an organization with others in the same industry.
The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.
Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.