Microsoft Entra ID vs NetIQ Access Manager comparison

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Access Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 29.9% mindshare in AM, compared to OpenText’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 218 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

11,213 Views
8,317 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

NetIQ Access Manager

Read 5 NetIQ Access Manager reviews

470 Views
332 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

NetIQ Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

NetIQ Access Manager and Microsoft Entra ID are both widely used in identity and access management. Microsoft Entra ID seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features, making users feel it is worth the price.

Features: NetIQ Access Manager users value its adaptability with different systems, robust security measures, and competitive pricing. Microsoft Entra ID is noted for its comprehensive cloud integration, advanced authentication mechanisms, and extensive features.

Room For Improvement: NetIQ Access Manager users suggest enhancing its reporting tools, streamlining updates, and improving offline functionality. Microsoft Entra ID users desire better offline functionality, more intuitive setup processes, and enhanced support for hybrid environments.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: NetIQ Access Manager is appreciated for its straightforward installation and reliable customer support. Microsoft Entra ID’s deployment is perceived as more challenging, but its customer service is highly responsive.

Pricing and ROI: NetIQ Access Manager is favored for its lower setup costs, leading to quicker ROI. Microsoft Entra ID, though perceived as more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

218

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (4th)

NetIQ Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Access Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 29.9%, up from 26.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetIQ Access Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Vinod Survase

M365 Senior Consultant at Capgemini

Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA

I want better integration between Azure AD and the on-prem environment because there are currently limitations that can hamper employee experience. We use a feature called password writeback, that can be challenging to implement in a hybrid environment. Employees can change their passwords using a self-service password reset (SSPR) feature, which reflects from the cloud to the on-prem identity, but not the other way around. Currently, there is no way to reflect passwords from on-prem identities to the cloud. There are other similar limitations, such as a cap on the number of identities that can be synchronized in a particular time frame, which can be an issue for large enterprises with 300,000 employees or more.

Read full review

Cassio-Silva

Technology director at Asyg

Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable

I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem The Multi-Factor Authentication of NetIQ Access Manager has helped protect our organization. The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is auto logs. It helps with user activity and monitoring. It also assists us with GLBA policies and procedures. Microsoft Entra ID gives a 360 view of what the user has access to, what applications are available to them, when they are logging in and out, etc. It makes knowing what is happening to our tenants incredibly powerful."

"It is one of those costs where you can't really quantify a return on investment. In the grand scheme of things, if we didn't have it, we would probably have a lot more breaches. It would be a lot harder to detect issues because we would have people using static usernames and passwords for various sites, making us open to a lot more attacks. The amount of security and benefit that we get out of it is not quantifiable but the return of investment from a qualitative point of view is much higher than not having it."

"It's definitely both stable and scalable."

"The most valuable aspect of Microsoft Entra ID is its ability to integrate with other cloud applications."

"It's a quite comprehensive solution and it scales quite well within our required scale as well, which is very useful."

"Conditional access and Privileged Identity Management (PIM) are the most valuable features from a security perspective."

"Installation is straightforward. It only took a couple of hours to set everything up."

"Entra's conditional access policies allow us to fine-tune how we allow people into the environments and secure them."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"It's very easy to integrate with applications."

"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs."

"The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication."

"The single sign-on feature is excellent."

"The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."

Cons

"The frequent changes in branding cause confusion among customers who struggle to keep track of product names and functions."

"Azure AD needs to be more in sync. The synchronization can be time-consuming."

"Microsoft could improve by stabilizing its branding. I still call it Azure AD. Some of the customers I work with call it Azure AD. Branding makes you stand out in the market, but it is something that also confuses people."

"On-premise capabilities for information and identity management need improvement."

"When it comes to identity and access life cycle management for applications that are run on-premises, as well as access governance, if those kinds of capabilities could be built into Azure Active Directory, that would be good."

"Microsoft Authenticator is as easy as Google Authenticator, but it is not open to all types of applications. Google Authenticator is integrated with other third-party platforms and applications, whereas Microsoft Authenticator is not. It should have more integration with third-party platforms and applications."

"Azure Active Directory could benefit by adding the capability for identity life cycle for the on-premise solution. For example, an HR solution, which is built on-premise or, in general, better on-premise capable solutions."

"The synchronization between my AD and Azure AD needs improvement."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."

"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance."

"Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more devices that utilize biometrics for Multi-Factor Authentication to improve the solution."

"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."

"Having the ability to easily extract and view and compare and version control configurations would be ideal."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is sold as part of the enterprise package and our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Pricing-wise, they offer a stepladder approach. You can start with the lowest level features, then start increasing based on new requirements."

"We don't really have a choice. It's the one shop in town. If you want this, you have to pay for it."

"We are always looking for better pricing."

"Be sure: You know your userbase, e.g., how many users you have. You choose the right license and model that suit your business requirements."

"It's pretty good. We're using the native features. It's bundled with our Office 365 licenses. We aren't paying anything extra for Azure Active Directory. It's pretty good for us because it's complementary to Office 365. We're only paying for Office 365."

"I work for an academic medical center, where there is a watch kept over every dollar spent. I do have concerns about the micro charges for different levels or features of the product."

"If you're on Azure, it can be free or it's incorporated, at no extra cost, or it can become extremely complicated."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing.

See all answers

What do you like most about NetIQ Access Manager?

The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetIQ Access Manager?

The number of legacy applications and classifications has room for improvement. Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more de...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetIQ Access Manager?

I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Okta Workforce Identity vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 45% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 19% of the time

More NetIQ Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

December 2024

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

NetIQ Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder

November 2024

Download NetIQ Access Manager product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

No data available

Learn More

Microsoft

OpenText

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

December 2024

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.