Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Access Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Microsoft holds a 29.9% mindshare in AM, compared to Oracle’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 218 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

11,213 Views
8,317 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Read 18 Oracle Access Manager reviews

919 Views
554 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Oracle Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Oracle Access Manager and Microsoft Entra ID are two prominent identity and access management solutions. Microsoft Entra ID has the upper hand due to its user-centric approach and advanced features.

Features: Oracle Access Manager offers high security, compatibility with various applications, and robust performance. Microsoft Entra ID provides seamless integration with Microsoft services, enhanced collaboration tools, and innovative features.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Access Manager needs a more intuitive configuration process, better technical support, and simplified management. Microsoft Entra ID requires improvements in scalability, more detailed documentation, and enhanced integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Access Manager is resource-intensive and time-consuming to deploy, with mixed feedback on customer service. Microsoft Entra ID offers a smoother deployment process and generally receives positive feedback for customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Access Manager has higher initial setup costs and a longer ROI period. Microsoft Entra ID is more cost-effective, with lower setup costs and quicker ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. Oracle Access Manager Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Oracle Access Manager

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

218

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (4th)

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 29.9%, up from 26.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Vinod Survase

M365 Senior Consultant at Capgemini

Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA

I want better integration between Azure AD and the on-prem environment because there are currently limitations that can hamper employee experience. We use a feature called password writeback, that can be challenging to implement in a hybrid environment. Employees can change their passwords using a self-service password reset (SSPR) feature, which reflects from the cloud to the on-prem identity, but not the other way around. Currently, there is no way to reflect passwords from on-prem identities to the cloud. There are other similar limitations, such as a cap on the number of identities that can be synchronized in a particular time frame, which can be an issue for large enterprises with 300,000 employees or more.

Read full review

Upendar G

Senior Consultant at Wipro Limited

Efficiently manage applications with secure single sign-on and streamlined operations

Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access. Its ability to consolidate applications on a single interface streamlines operations significantly. The product is highly secure and reliable, especially in managing user access across various platforms. Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring additional verification steps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."

"Microsoft customer service is the best in the industry."

"It has been very instrumental towards a lot of services we run, especially on the single sign-on side. For example, we have 160 countries that all run their own IT but we still are able to provide users with a single sign-on experience towards global applications. So, they have a certain set of accounts that they get from their local IT department, then they use exactly the same account and credentials to sign into global services. For the user, it has been quite instrumental in that space. It is about efficiency, but also about users not having to remember multiple accounts and passwords since it is all single sign-on. Therefore, the single sign-on experience for us has been the most instrumental for the end user experience."

"If a company has hundreds of users that already exist in the cloud, and it now wants to enable those same users to be present in third-party applications that their business uses, like Atlassian or GoToMeeting, the provisioning technology can assist in achieving that."

"It's very user-friendly for users."

"I would rate Microsoft Entra ID 10 out of 10."

"It certainly centralizes usernames, and it certainly centralizes credentials. Companies have different tolerances for synchronizing those credentials versus redirecting to on-prem. The use case of maturing into the cloud helps from a SaaS adoption standpoint, and it also tends to be the jumping-off point for larger organizations to start doing PaaS and infrastructure as a service. So, platform as a service and infrastructure as a service kind of dovetail off the Active Directory synchronization piece and the email and SharePoint. It becomes a natural step for people, who wouldn't normally do infrastructure as a service, because they're already exposed to this, and they have already set up their email and SharePoint there. All of the components are there."

"https://www.itcentralstation.com/product_reviews/microsoft-bi-review-52460-by-amanda-zhou"

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."

"The product supports customization."

"I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one."

"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."

"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

Cons

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"I would like to see a better delegation of access. For instance, we want to allow different groups within the company to manage different elements of Azure AD, but I need more granularity in delegating access."

"Many people believe that the Azure Active Directory is overly complicated and antiquated."

"There is a lot of room for improvement in terms of its integration with the local Active Directory. There are some gaps in terms of the local Active Directory through which Microsoft is syncing our environment from our data center. There should be the availability of custom attributes on Azure Active Directory. In addition, there should be the availability of security groups and distribution groups that are residing on the local Active Directory. Currently, they are not replicated on Azure Active Directory by default."

"The technical support can be confusing - if you're looking for something very specific, it can be hard to get the right answer or a solution."

"In my opinion, Microsoft sometimes releases products too early without providing enough documentation."

"The synchronization between my AD and Azure AD needs improvement."

"There should be a clearer separation between objects held in Entra and Azure, so we don't need to approach the Entra ID team to create rules, policies, and app registrations. It would help if we could make independent IDs on the Azure side to go through that team to create a role, change permissions, or create something for a specific task."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup."

"The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."

"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."

"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

"The performance of Oracle Access Manager could be improved. It should be quick to install, but it wasn't, so this is another area for improvement. The Oracle Access Manager console also has room for improvement because it's slow."

"In other products, we can customize on the GUI end, whereas in Oracle, we need to take a backup of the JAR file and then customize it...and during this process, sometimes the WebLogic admin console will go down, which will impact the process."

"The solution's lifecycle management is troublesome. Also, another area of issue in the solution is the part involving documentation of certain features."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price is in the midrange."

"It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it."

"I don't pay for it. Going by how I feel, I see the prices for any MFA solution going down because the more different alternatives there are, the cheaper things should be. Microsoft Authenticator app would be the preferred application, but there are too many ways to implement MFA. I don't know how much it cost, but the price should go down."

"Azure Active Directory is expensive."

"Licenses are based on the usage. There is no cap. It's based on the number of users we provision."

"Our customers are looking for advanced features and processes for it to be cost-effective for their organizations. They see it as an overpriced product. They are enjoying using Azure Active Directory, but they are looking for better prices."

"We don't really have a choice. It's the one shop in town. If you want this, you have to pay for it."

"Be sure: You know your userbase, e.g., how many users you have. You choose the right license and model that suit your business requirements."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"The tool is affordable."

"The product is a little expensive."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Access Manager?

The product supports customization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than alternatives like Okta and CyberArk. Although it offers robust security, the cost might not justify its features for organizations with fewer applications.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup. Enhancements in automation would eas...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 43% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 12% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Auth0 vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

December 2024

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

December 2024

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

No data available

Learn More

Microsoft

Oracle

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Oracle

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Oracle Access Manager

December 2024

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. Oracle Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.