Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText AppWorks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Power Apps boosts productivity with time savings, automation, cost efficiency, and potential fivefold ROI, enhancing operational value.
No sentiment score available
The connection between Power Apps and Power BI simplifies generating and presenting reports, alleviating the workload and enhancing productivity.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Power Apps support is responsive but inconsistent, with variations in satisfaction depending on resources and support plans.
Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText AppWorks customer service receives mixed reviews, with some users satisfied but others seeking more expertise and resolution efficiency.
Microsoft's technical support is around a seven to eight.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Microsoft Power Apps is scalable and adaptable but can incur costs and performance issues in complex scaling scenarios.
No sentiment score available
If it is flexible and includes premium connectors, scalability is easy.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Microsoft Power Apps is generally reliable and stable, with occasional performance issues under heavy data loads or network challenges.
No sentiment score available
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps as a nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Power Apps could improve in integration, usability, documentation, performance, support, and licensing to enhance user experience.
This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
The integration of Microsoft's autonomous AI agents would be an excellent enhancement for Power Apps.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Power Apps offers flexible pricing, starting at $10 per user per month, with options for premium features and plans.
OpenText AppWorks' pricing is mid-tier, with costs varying by users, requiring custom quotes for optimal pricing and broader features.
For small to medium enterprises, it is affordable, especially with Microsoft Enterprise licensing.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Power Apps enables rapid app development with seamless integration, customization, and minimal programming, enhancing enterprise efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
The integration with SharePoint is part of the enterprise package, making it cost-effective.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Power Apps
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (1st), Low-Code Development Platforms (1st)
OpenText AppWorks
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Process, Business Automation, and Digital Transformation solutions, they serve different purposes. Microsoft Power Apps is designed for Rapid Application Development Software and holds a mindshare of 17.0%, down 23.9% compared to last year.
OpenText AppWorks, on the other hand, focuses on Business Process Management (BPM), holds 0.4% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Rapid Application Development Software
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Praveen Chaudhary - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates form creation and application planning but lacks performance
We have started exploring those parts. It is in the initial stages and capable of performing simple tasks that are helpful. We are still exploring how it can work with profiles, and other AI features that Microsoft continues to introduce. It provides a basic starting point within its capabilities. Microsoft Power Apps is a perfect tool. Understanding its limitations is crucial to identifying where it best fits within organizational solutions. It excels in scenarios requiring quick turnaround times, offering easy maintenance with minimal technical expertise needed. However, it's not suited for complex enterprise-level solutions. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Ankit Mehta - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates processes like purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation
The setup process is relatively straightforward, typically taking around four to five hours for installation. While setting up high availability and multiple nodes may require additional time, the standard installation process is simple and can usually be completed within three to four hours.Deployment can be straightforward, especially with the addition of CL/CD capabilities in recent versions, leveraging Docker and Kubernetes. Even before these enhancements, the standard process of creating and installing packages with dependencies was relatively uncomplicated. Maintenance typically requires only one or two resources per customer, with more significant landscapes potentially requiring two or three resources. I rate the product's ease of integrating with existing infrastructure a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?
We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?
OpenText AppWorks is somewhere mid-tier in terms of pricing compared to other products like Pega and IBM. It is not as costly. However, you need good negotiation with the vendor for the best pricing.
What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?
OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types. The BPMN 2.0 model does not function as designed, and there are challenges with application performance a...
 

Also Known As

PowerApps, MS PowerApps
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Power Apps vs. OpenText AppWorks and other solutions. Updated: July 2023.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.