Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Power Apps vs Studio Creatio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Organizations using Microsoft Power Apps saw increased productivity and efficiency despite licensing challenges, with notable cost and resource savings.
Sentiment score
8.9
Studio Creatio boosted ROI with streamlined processes, task automation, enhanced productivity, reduced costs, and industry-specific adaptability.
The connection between Power Apps and Power BI simplifies generating and presenting reports, alleviating the workload and enhancing productivity.
The aim is to create a cleaner interface to replace spreadsheets, thus standardizing processes and improving efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Power Apps support is effective but inconsistent, with varied response times and reliance on community resources and documentation.
Sentiment score
7.6
Studio Creatio's customer service is praised for responsiveness and competence, though challenges exist with regional support and certified developers.
Their assistance was crucial as we developed the solutions.
Microsoft's technical support is around a seven to eight.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Microsoft Power Apps is scalable with customization and integration, though costs and performance limitations can affect larger deployments.
Sentiment score
8.2
Studio Creatio is a highly scalable platform used by medium and large companies, praised for handling multiple roles and processes efficiently.
If it is flexible and includes premium connectors, scalability is easy.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Microsoft Power Apps is praised for stability, reliability, and effective data handling, despite occasional slowdowns or complex app issues.
Sentiment score
8.1
Studio Creatio is praised for its stability and reliability, with users attributing occasional issues to external factors.
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps as a nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Power Apps needs better integration, simpler licensing, improved UI, and enhanced resources for usability and large data handling.
Studio Creatio needs better mobile customization, UI control, business rule flexibility, accurate translations, technical documentation, and improved performance for large processes.
This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
These tools should be intuitive for business users who will need at least a week of training to use them effectively.
The integration of Microsoft's autonomous AI agents would be an excellent enhancement for Power Apps.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Power Apps pricing starts at $10/month, varies by usage and features, with special rates for non-profits and governments.
Studio Creatio offers a flexible and reasonably priced licensing model, costing $15 per user per month, rated 5-6 in affordability.
For more elaborate work, an upgrade to an enterprise license, costing around $35 per license, is needed.
For small to medium enterprises, it is affordable, especially with Microsoft Enterprise licensing.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Power Apps enables rapid, low-code app development with seamless Microsoft integration, enhancing workflows and data visualization efficiently.
Studio Creatio provides configurable CRM, low-code/no-code platforms, and process management with automation, scalability, and superb business support features.
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
The integration with SharePoint is part of the enterprise package, making it cost-effective.
The solutions are easily integrated with other Microsoft products.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Power Apps
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
1st
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Studio Creatio
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
22nd
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
18th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 15.2%, down from 22.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Studio Creatio is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Guhan Eshwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Building tools with user-friendly interfaces abut needs integration improvements
An integration of Copilot options within Microsoft Power Apps would be useful. In UiPath apps, there is an autopilot function that uses a generative AI model, which creates layouts and connects data services automatically with a prompt. Such integration would be beneficial to build basic frameworks that can be enhanced. This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
Anatolii Vovniuk - PeerSpot reviewer
Customizable, easy to use, and has good built-in dashboards
The tool is available on the cloud as well as on-premise. The ease of setup depends on the complexity of the project. In most cases, we just connect and work. We must create our own team and find a partner to build our own application. If we need to create something new, it will take time. I rate the ease of setup of the cloud version a ten out of ten. However, I would rate the ease of setup of the on-premise version a five or six out of ten. The on-premise version takes longer to deploy. The cloud version can be deployed within minutes. We receive a license key and start working. If all the components are ready, we can deploy the on-premise version within ten days.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
What do you like most about Studio Creatio?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a low-code and no-code platform.
What needs improvement with Studio Creatio?
Sometimes, the cloud version provides slow responses. The documentation must be more technical. Sometimes, we need to work with massive external data. We might have 10 to 20 million lines of data t...
 

Also Known As

PowerApps, MS PowerApps
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
Rangel Logistics Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Power Apps vs. Studio Creatio and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.