Microsoft System Center vs SolarWinds AppOptics comparison

Microsoft and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.8, while SolarWinds is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 0.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Microsoft System Center

Read 19 Microsoft System Center reviews

163 Views
87 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

SolarWinds AppOptics

Read 9 SolarWinds AppOptics reviews

372 Views
257 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center

SolarWinds AppOptics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Microsoft System Center and SolarWinds AppOptics compete in IT infrastructure management. Microsoft System Center seems to have the upper hand in Windows-centric environments due to its strong integration with Microsoft suites and automation capabilities, while SolarWinds is better for real-time monitoring and network performance visualization.

Features: Microsoft System Center integrates seamlessly with Microsoft applications, offering robust automation and comprehensive management for Windows, including third-party hypervisors and API integrations, with a user-friendly interface and low learning curve. SolarWinds AppOptics provides agentless, real-time network and application monitoring with advanced visualization tools like heat maps, focusing on network and application performance analyzation, often praised for its intuitive dashboard.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center struggles with integration of non-Microsoft products, demands significant computing resources, and has an outdated interface and documentation. SolarWinds AppOptics lacks traditional SNMP/CLI monitoring and needs improved integration with other tools, enhanced AI functionalities, and better centralization for efficient use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center is mainly on-premises with hybrid cloud options, featuring inconsistent support that can require effort to resolve and high costs. SolarWinds AppOptics supports on-premises and cloud models with simpler setup and less frequent technical support, leading to more streamlined user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center generally incurs higher costs with yearly payments, delivering ROI through automation and remote support, while SolarWinds AppOptics operates on a perpetual license with node-based pricing, perceived as simpler and competitive, offering a good return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft System Center vs. SolarWinds AppOptics Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center vs. SolarWinds AppOptics

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft System Center

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (13th)

SolarWinds AppOptics

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

34th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (48th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (50th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft System Center is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds AppOptics is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ajinkya Mohod

System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv

Makes user management and application management easy for users

Speaking about the impact of the automation feature that impacted our company's operational efficiency, I can say that the complete tool works on automation. You just have to configure it, and it works, especially in areas like auto-patching updates. I suggest that others can definitely go ahead with Microsoft System Center, especially beginners who choose it, can get hands-on experience with it, and acquire a good understanding of how things work. In terms of the value and benefits derived from the use of the solution, I can say that my company's operations have been made simpler because of the product, especially in areas like user management and application management where we have been benefited a lot. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

John Yuko

Assistant Manager ICT - Projects at I&M Bank Ltd

Unique features allow consolidating and combing metrics into a single dashboard, but don't monitor mobile solutions

I would like to see more granular information provided on Unix applications. Also, the integration with Unix services should be a bit more straightforward in terms having an agent to retrieve your credentials rather than having to enter or save them for SSH on SolarWinds. From the outset, we had to set some commands to log into the search console, and they are saved on the solution, which presents a challenge in terms of exposure. The solution is unable to monitor APK solutions completely because we'd then be forced to break down the APK and provide the APIs or go through the source code. They don't have a module that can analyze an application that is maybe under-used.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The detail in the alarms is great."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it helps us manage our company's application pool, license pool, application update pool, and OS updates."

"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."

"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment."

"The tool has many valuable features, including license tracking, software deployment, and installation deployment. However, we primarily use it for Windows updates and deployment for Windows servers and desktops. It's a complex product but very well-managed. If you use all the features, they will be valuable to your organization. It allows you to deploy desktops, manage patches, and track various features."

"Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure."

More Microsoft System Center pros

"Some of the most valuable features of SolarWinds are the topology discovery and network performance analysis."

"I have found the most valuable feature is application performance management."

"The product has a great dashboard."

"Technical support is always live and they're supportive."

"The reporting of the solution is very good."

"The sum solution, NTA, and DPA."

Cons

"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."

"Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there."

"Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software deployment, we mainly use it for Windows updates. It protects many screens and integrates with databases, but it's complex compared to other solutions. Many now use cloud-based products or other tools like Automox to deploy updates and manage vulnerabilities."

"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."

"Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."

"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

More Microsoft System Center cons

"AppOptics would benefit from having a much more centralized view."

"The integration with Unix services should be a bit more straightforward."

"In terms of the technology, I think they need to put some more advanced troubleshooting into SolarWinds, in terms of AI capabilities. That's the next generation, especially in the cases of APIs which have already adopted AI capabilities into their products."

"The solution should be more user-friendly."

"I would like to see more integration with other tools that are available on the market."

"The implementation needs improvement. It needs to get modernized with the newer cloud scenario in both public and private deployment models."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"We maximized our license investment."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"Mostly, it's a perpetual license. We don't have any customers using the subscription right now—it's mostly a perpetual license that the customers purchase. The licensing is based on the number of elements, whereas other solutions are node-based."

"Since it's a negotiable rate, I would rate the pricing as a five out of five."

"I believe the current licensing cost is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

58%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software depl...

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds AppOptics?

The product has a great dashboard.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds AppOptics?

The solution should be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds AppOptics?

I used the solution for monitoring servers and network equipment.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 50% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 50% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Competitors

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 30% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 21% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 13% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 11% of the time

More SolarWinds AppOptics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center

March 2025

Download Microsoft System Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download SolarWinds AppOptics product report

Also Known As

MS System Center

AppOptics, SolarWinds TraceView, Librato

Overview

System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.

Microsoft

AppOptics is a SaaS-based simple, powerful and affordable Infrastructure & Application monitoring for custom on-premises, cloud, and hybrid systems.

Your business runs on applications, and when they go down or run slowly, it can impact the business in lost productivity, customers, or revenue. To add to the complexity, your IT environment is changing, and workloads can be spread across data centers, and cloud resources. You need to monitor the availability and performance of applications and infrastructure, regardless of where they are, so you can identify potential issues early and address them before they impact users

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia

TraxoCovea Insurance BTE TechnologyDatarista

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center vs. SolarWinds AppOptics

March 2025

Free Report: Microsoft System Center vs. SolarWinds AppOptics

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft System Center vs. SolarWinds AppOptics and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft System Center vs. SolarWinds AppOptics report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.