Morphisec vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection comparison

Morphisec and Broadcom are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Morphisec is ranked #33, while Broadcom is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.6. Morphisec holds a 1.0% mindshare in ATP, compared to Broadcom’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Morphisec users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Morphisec

Read 21 Morphisec reviews

150 Views
84 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Read 16 Symantec Advanced Threat Protection reviews

706 Views
321 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Morphisec

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and Morphisec compete in the cybersecurity space, each offering unique strengths in threat prevention and response. Morphisec seems to have the upper hand due to its innovative preventive capabilities and cost-effective pricing structure.

Features: Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers comprehensive threat analysis with real-time response capabilities, click-time URL protection, network intrusion detection, and endpoint to network protection. Its ability to integrate with SIEM products like IBM QRadar enhances its utility in hybrid environments. Morphisec focuses on in-memory protection and zero-day attack prevention using a lightweight, signatureless approach that masks OS processes. Its Moving Target Defense feature and straightforward integration with minimal false positives are key strengths.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Advanced Threat Protection could improve its cloud platform to better compete with next-gen EDR products, enhance its support services, and simplify its administration interface. It also requires better scalability and integration with newer OSs. Morphisec could benefit from automated reporting, enhanced network discovery, and more comprehensive alert explanations. Its customer support is still maturing, suggesting a need for better customer interaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Advanced Threat Protection supports various deployment modes, but users note a complex setup process and inconsistent technical support. Morphisec offers multiple deployment options praised for ease of setup and integration. Users find its technical support responsive, though proactive customer communication could be stronger. Morphisec generally provides a more seamless deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is often seen as expensive, yet offers a flexible licensing model with positive ROI due to long-term use. Morphisec is competitively priced, offering flexible licensing and a lightweight nature that enhances ROI by providing cost savings compared to more expensive options like CrowdStrike. Its pricing structure is perceived as more economical while effectively delivering zero-day protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Morphisec vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Morphisec

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

33rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (58th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (56th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (59th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (36th), Threat Deception Platforms (14th)

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Morphisec is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Islam Shaikh

Senior Manager - IT at IndiGrid Limited

Lightweight, detects everything quickly, and takes corrective action

We sometimes have to depend on the support team to know what action we should take. If the solution for an alert can be built into the report that we are getting, it will save time, and the interaction with support would be less. At times, corrective action is required, but at times, we don't need to take any action. It would be good if we get to know in the report that a particular infection doesn't require any action. It will save us time and effort. Other than that, nothing else is required. They have taken care of everything. We are getting alerts, and we can have multiple admins. We get a good model with this view.

Read full review

Dennis O'Reilly

Cyber SecOps Principal at Dotcom Security

Provides end-to-end antivirus protection and has good stability

Symantec Endpoint Protection provides end-to-end protection. Along with antivirus protection, it has a lot of key areas, including intrusive prevention, firewall features, and application and device control. It can integrate with other Broadcom solutions, such as Symantec Messaging Gateway and Symantec DLP. If you want to send an email, it gets scanned through endpoint protection and DLP. We get all Symantec functionality in a single pane.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Morphisec makes it very easy for IT teams of any size to prevent breaches of critical systems because of the design of their tool. When we evaluated Morphisec, the CIO and I sat and listened. What attracted us to them is the fact that it stops activity at the point of detection. That saves a lot of time because now we are not investigating and trying to trace down what to turn off. We have already prevented it, which makes it very much safer and more secure."

"Morphisec Guard enables us to see at a glance whether our users have device control and disk encryption enabled properly. This is important because we are a global company operating with multiple entities. Previously, we didn't have that visibility. Now, we have visibility so we can pinpoint some locations where there are machines that are not really protected, offline, etc. It gives us visibility, which is good."

"Morphisec stops attacks without needing to know what type of threat it is, just that it is foreign. It is based on injections, so it would know when a software launches. If a software launches and something else also launches, then it would count that as anomalous and block it. Because the software looks at the code, and if it executes something else that is not related, then Morphisec would block it. That is how it works."

"Morphisec provides full visibility into security events from Microsoft Defender and Morphisec in one dashboard. Defender and Morphisec are integrated. It's important because it lowers the total cost of maintenance on the engineer's time, more or less. So the administrative time is dramatically reduced in maintaining the product. This saves an engineer around four to five hours a week."

"It provides full visibility into security events and from both solutions in one dashboard. I'm not a big security guy, if I have a threat that looks like there's a problem, I will ask Morphisec to dissect it for me, and tell me what might be happening. Because it tends to be all hash codes, so I can tell what's going on. They've been pretty good with that."

"We don't have to do anything as a user or as an admin. It does everything by default with its coding and inbuilt AI-based intelligence. We don't have to instruct it about what to do. It automatically takes corrective actions and quarantines or deletes a virus, malware, etc. That is the best part that I like about it."

"The simplicity of the solution, how easy it is to deploy and how small it is when deployed as an agent on a device, is probably the biggest aspect, given what it can do."

"The fact that Morphisec uses deterministic attack prevention that does not require human intervention has affected our security team's operations by making things much simpler. We don't have to really track down various alerts anymore, they've just stopped. At that point, we can go in and we can clean up whatever needs to be cleaned up. There are some things that Morphisec detects that we can't really remove, it's parts of Internet Explorer, but it's being blocked anyway. So we're happy with that."

More Morphisec pros

"The most valuable feature is Click-time URL protection."

"What I like most about Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is its notification capability."

"All of the solution's features are quite valuable for us. We especially like the threat protection it provides."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow threat protection."

"Technical support is very responsive. You just have to open a ticket. They respond in a timely manner. Their response is good. I'm satisfied."

"Symantec Endpoint Protection provides end-to-end protection. Along with antivirus protection, it has a lot of key areas, including intrusive prevention, firewall features, and application and device control."

"Endpoint to network protects the line."

"The great advantage in using this product is it creates multiple services."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection pros

Cons

"We wanted to have multi-tenants in their cloud platform, so every entity can look into their own systems and not see other systems in other entities. I have a beta version on that now. I would like them to incorporate that in the cloud solution."

"If anything, tech support might be their weakest link. The process of getting someone involved sometimes takes a little time. It seems to me that they should have all the data they need to let me know whether an alert is legitimate or not, but they tend to need a lot of information from me to get to the bottom of something. It usually takes a little longer than I would expect."

"The only area that really needs improvement is the reporting functionality. Gathering the detailed information that is in the system for an executive, or for me as a director, could be better. Some of the interface and reporting aspects are a little bit dated. They're working on it."

"Morphisec is a venture startup. They are still early in their growth stage. They need to get mature on their customer support and on how they interface with system tools. For example, they need to get multifactor in place and an API for the major multi-factor systems, e.g., Okta, Duo, Ping, and Microsoft. They don't have them built in yet. They are working on them. It is just not there yet. Also, their stability, customer support, and processes need improvement, which is just part of maturity."

"I haven't been able to get the cloud deployment to work. When there's an update, I'm supposed to be able to roll it out for the cloud solution, but right now I'm continuing to use our SCCM solution to update it."

"We started in the Linux platform and we deployed to Linux. The licensing of that has been kind of confusing between Linux licensing and Windows licensing. The overall simplicity of licensing or offering an enterprise license to just cover everything and then we don't have to count needs improvement."

"The dashboard is the area that requires the most improvement. We have about, I would say 5,500 computers currently, and searching through all of those takes some time to filter. So as soon as you apply the filter, it takes a few seconds. It crunches, it thinks, and then it brings up the clients that match."

"We have discovered some bugs in the new releases that they've had to fix, so I would like to see more testing and QA on their side before they release."

More Morphisec cons

"There are limits with respect to blocking files by hash value or blocking IP addresses, and these limits should be removed."

"The support for new OSs and older OSs could be a little tighter. They need to be more upfront about what protection services they're going to provide on new OSs. I haven't seen the Windows 11 version out yet. It is either already released in Beta, or the Beta will be released soon. There could be a little bit more advanced updates on what they're doing to help protect Windows 11 environments. They can let us know in advance so that we know it is going to be protected. We can't roll out the new OS without putting end-point protection on it. So, they should tell us what is their support model for that, and what are they doing to protect Windows 11. They're not telling me, and that's a criticism. The same issue is applicable to all the other antivirus tools. It is not just Symantec; all of them have this problem."

"There are some ‎features that would add value to this product. One of them would be a graphical presentation of threats that the system has encountered."

"The cloud platform needs to have improvement in terms of the user interface and the different capabilities it has available. It needs to match the other leading next-gen EDR products that are available in the market. That's the reason why we are stepping away from Symantec. Their cloud environment is just generally lacking in comparison to others."

"Not ideal for advanced threat protection."

"They could enhance the solution to work across all devices, including Android, iOS, and Mac, and make it more user-friendly."

"The security features need to be improved."

"Scalability could be better."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Morphisec is reasonably priced because our parent company's other subsidiaries use different products like CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is four or five times more expensive than Morphisec. The competitive pricing saves us money in our overall security stack."

"It does not have multi-tenants. If South Africa wants to show only the machines that they have, they need their own cloud incidence. It is not possible to have that in a single cloud incidence with multiple tenants in it, instead you need to have multiple cloud incidences. Then, if you have that, it will be more expensive. However, they are going to change that, which is good."

"Our licensing is tied into our contract. Because we have a long-term contract, our pricing is a little bit lower. It is per year, so we don't get charged per endpoint, but we do have a cap. Our cap is 80 endpoints. If we were to go over 80, when we renewed our contract, which is not until three years are over. Then, they would reevaluate, and say, "Well, you have more than 80 devices active right now. This is going to be the price change." They know that we are installing and replacing computers, so the numbers will be all over the place depending on whether you archive or don't archive, which is the reason why we just have to keep up on that stuff."

"It is an annual subscription basis per device. For the devices that we have in scope right now, it is about $25,000 a year."

"Price-wise, it's on the higher side. A traditional antivirus solution is cheaper, but in terms of security and manageability, its ROI is better than a traditional antivirus. I would recommend it to anybody evaluating or considering an antivirus solution. If your system gets compromised, the cost of ransom would be a lot more. This way, it saves a lot of cost."

"It is a little bit more expensive than other security products that we use, but it does provide us good protection. So, it is a trade-off."

"It is priced correctly for what it does. They end up doing a good deal of discounting, but I think it is priced appropriately."

"We are still using a separate tool. I know for our 600 or I think we're actually licensed for up to 700 users, it runs me 23 or $24,000 a year. When you're talking to that many users plus servers being protected, that's well worth the investment for that dollar amount."

More Morphisec pricing and cost advice

"Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's pricing is comparable."

"Symantec Endpoint Protection has an average price."

"The price is quite expensive."

"The pricing of this solution is inexpensive and affordable."

"Pricing is good. It is nice to have a great product at a fair price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

75%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

The price is quite expensive because a different entity has taken over the company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

One area for improvement could be the pricing model. Future releases could further enhance integration capabilities with other platforms and simplify the licensing model to compete more with Micros...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Morphisec

Compared 34% of the time

Halcyon vs Morphisec

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Morphisec

Compared 12% of the time

Virsec Security Platform vs Morphisec

Compared 7% of the time

Hyver vs Morphisec

Compared 7% of the time

More Morphisec Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 26% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 18% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 14% of the time

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 14% of the time

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec

March 2025

Download Morphisec product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

March 2025

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection report

Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection product report

Also Known As

Morphisec, Morphisec Moving Target Defense

No data available

Overview

Morphisec integrates seamlessly with platforms like Microsoft Defender, offering signatureless protection against zero-day threats and ransomware. It enhances existing endpoint solutions with minimal maintenance through its set-and-forget deployment, providing heightened security and reduced false positives.

Morphisec strengthens defense strategies by merging memory morphing and signatureless protection to effectively block zero-day attacks and ransomware. It operates efficiently within existing infrastructure, reducing system impact and maintenance needs. Users find its full visibility dashboard invaluable. Despite its strengths, cloud deployment and reporting features can be improved. Stability, alerts, and integration with other systems pose challenges for users, impacting usability and support quality.

What are Morphisec's key features?

Seamless Integration: Works with Microsoft Defender for comprehensive dashboard visibility
Memory Morphing: Hides processes to reduce attack surfaces
Signatureless Protection: Prevents threats without impacting performance
Automatic Threat Blocking: Uses inbuilt intelligence to detect risks
Set-and-Forget Deployment: Simplifies management and reduces maintenance

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Quick Deployment: Fast setup without disrupting operations
Enhanced Protection: Provides an additional defense layer against advanced threats
Cost-Effectiveness: Works with existing licenses, minimizing extra investments
Improved Compatibility: Integrates smoothly with current antivirus systems
Minimal System Impact: Operates efficiently without overloading resources

In security-focused industries, Morphisec is crucial for protecting workstations and servers against sophisticated attacks like ransomware. Its signatureless technology offers early threat detection, while compatibility with existing systems ensures seamless integration, providing advanced protection without additional licensing costs.

Morphisec

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is a single unified solution that uncovers, prioritizes, and remediates advanced attacks. The product fuses intelligence from endpoint, network, and email control points, as well as Symantec’s massive global sensor network, to stop threats that evade individual security products. It leverages your existing Symantec Endpoint Protection and Symantec Email Security.cloud investments, so it does not require the deployment of any new agents. You can deploy a new installation of Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and start to discover suspicious activity in under an hour. Using the proven technology in Symantec Insight reputation based detection, Symantec SONAR behavioral analysis with the new Symantec Cynic sandbox and file analysis platform, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection provides better detection and prioritization than other vendors, allowing security analysts to “zero in” on just those specific security events of importance.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Lenovo/Motorola, TruGreen, Covenant Health, Citizens Medical Center

ECI

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

March 2025

Free Report: Morphisec vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Morphisec vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Morphisec vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.