Top Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Competitors
Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Advanced Threat Protection based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, and Microsoft Defender for Identity.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Broadcom Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection excels in endpoint and network security with strong integration options. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 emphasizes superior integration within its ecosystem, benefiting companies invested in Office products. Symantec offers fair pricing; Microsoft provides significant ROI through its comprehensive suite.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Office 365, which offers a broader range of setup features at a higher price point.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Office 365, which offers a broader range of setup features at a higher price point.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire excels with comprehensive malware detection and seamless integration within its ecosystem, ideal for robust network security. In comparison, Symantec ATP offers advanced threat analytics and competitive pricing, appealing to those prioritizing flexible cost management and SIEM integration.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers robust integration and threat analysis with comprehensive alert features. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Identity excels in identity security using AI and strong Microsoft integration, making Symantec attractive for flexibility and Defender for streamlined Microsoft environments in enhancing security strategies.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Identity. Microsoft Defender, while costing more, offers an integrated approach, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Identity. Microsoft Defender, while costing more, offers an integrated approach, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
Fortinet FortiSandbox offers customizable integration with FortiGate and excels in zero-day threat detection, appealing to those seeking scalability. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection provides robust email and network protection, making it suitable for comprehensive threat analysis and SIEM integration.
Trellix Network Detection and Response excels with Yara rule editing and zero-day vulnerability handling. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection integrates well with SIEM products and offers affordable pricing. Trellix provides significant ROI in threat detection, while Symantec's affordability appeals to cost-conscious buyers.
Trellix Network Detection and Response incurs a higher setup cost, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers a more affordable initial investment. Symantec provides cost efficiency, but Trellix emphasizes advanced capabilities justifying the higher startup expense.
Trellix Network Detection and Response incurs a higher setup cost, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers a more affordable initial investment. Symantec provides cost efficiency, but Trellix emphasizes advanced capabilities justifying the higher startup expense.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is ideal for those needing comprehensive endpoint security and real-time analysis. In comparison, Check Point SandBlast Network excels in zero-day threat protection and sandboxing, making it attractive for organizations prioritizing advanced threat isolation and high detection rates.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. This pricing difference may influence user preference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. This pricing difference may influence user preference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
