Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager enhances security by automating tasks, improving compliance, reducing breaches, and increasing efficiency and ROI.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
CyberArk's support is efficient and knowledgeable, but challenges exist in response times, communication, and handling complex cases.
Sentiment score
6.3
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's customer service sees mixed feedback, highlighting responsiveness, delays, and improving technical expertise post-Broadcom acquisition.
Response times seem to correlate with the strength of the relationship with the CyberArk account manager, with quicker responses when rapport is strong.
They are helpful, but complex issues can take a long time to resolve, which can delay solutions for urgent customer issues.
CyberArk's customer service has improved recently and is now very responsive.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is highly scalable and versatile, though complexity in licensing and configurations may pose challenges.
Sentiment score
7.2
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection scales effectively for complex environments but may face challenges in on-premises hardware-dependent deployments.
We started small and expanded it to an enterprise level, and are now moving to the cloud for further growth.
We have different operating systems, database systems, and decentralized infrastructure.
I find SaaS to be more promising in scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable, with issues mainly from configuration, infrastructure, or resource limitations rather than the software.
Sentiment score
7.4
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is stable, reliable, and effective, though updates may cause crashes and blocking features need adjustment.
Proper fine-tuning and expertise ensure the product performs well.
Overall, the stability of the solution is high.
It has a large customer base and positive feedback within my network.
 

Room For Improvement

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager needs UI, integration, and performance improvements, simpler setup, cost-effectiveness, and more plugins for usability.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection needs improvements in usability, threat protection, customization, alerting, compatibility, support, pricing, and security features.
They want everything to be on the cloud, but even in the SaaS version of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, they need to deploy some servers on-premises.
In the long term, I would like to see these processes simplified, especially for on-premise installations.
Incorporating automated onboarding and offboarding features directly into the product would reduce the maintenance burden on administrators.
 

Setup Cost

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is costly, especially for small businesses, though discounts exist for larger purchases.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers competitive yearly pricing with moderate satisfaction, influenced by license volume and organizational factors.
CyberArk is expensive compared to other products I know.
CyberArk's SaaS solution is particularly expensive.
CyberArk is comparatively expensive compared to other PAM solutions, such as Delinea, especially during renewal.
 

Valuable Features

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager enhances security with password management, session monitoring, integration flexibility, and real-time auditing for compliance.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers comprehensive, integrated security with real-time threat analysis and detailed incident management across multiple platforms.
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager helps ensure data privacy because we now know who is using which credentials and at what time.
For me, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's most valuable features are password and session management.
After giving access, it continually checks if the user is the same user.
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Privileged Access ...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
197
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (3rd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (1st), Mainframe Security (2nd), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)
Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is designed for Privileged Access Management (PAM) and holds a mindshare of 20.9%, down 23.8% compared to last year.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, on the other hand, focuses on Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), holds 2.3% mindshare, down 2.6% since last year.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

SatishIyer - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK
When I was a component owner for PAM's Privileged Threat Analytics (PTA) component, what I wanted was a clear mapping to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, a framework which has a comprehensive list of use cases. We reached out to the vendor and asked them how much coverage they have of the uses cases found on MITRE, which would have given us a better view of things while I was the product owner. Unfortunately they did not have the capability of mapping onto MITRE's framework at that time. PTA is essentially the monitoring interface of the broker (e.g. Privileged Access Management, the Vault, CPM, PSM, etc.), and it's where you can capture your broker bypass and perform related actions. For this reason, we thought that this kind of mapping would be required, but CyberArk informed us that they did not have the capability we had in mind with regard to MITRE ATT&CK. I am not sure what the situation is now, but it would definitely help to have that kind of alignment with one of the more well-known frameworks like MITRE. For CyberArk as a vendor, it would also help them to clearly spell out in which areas they have full functionality and in which ares they have partial or none. Of course, it also greatly benefits the customers when they're evaluating the product.
TapabrataSamanta - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable platform with effective integration capabilities
Our primary use case for the product is to provide advanced threat protection to our clients, primarily in the banking and financial sectors Symantec ATP has been beneficial in ensuring robust security for our clients. Its effectiveness in detecting and mitigating threats has improved customer…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
32%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
77%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?
We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...
What do you like most about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution are control and analytics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager comes at a high cost. But the solution is worth its price.
What do you like most about Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?
Symantec Endpoint Protection provides end-to-end protection. Along with antivirus protection, it has a lot of key areas, including intrusive prevention, firewall features, and application and devic...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?
The price is quite expensive because a different entity has taken over the company.
What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?
One area for improvement could be the pricing model. Future releases could further enhance integration capabilities with other platforms and simplify the licensing model to compete more with Micros...
 

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
ECI
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.