NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs NetApp SnapCenter comparison

Nakivo and NetApp are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Nakivo is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.4, while NetApp is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.0. Nakivo holds a 1.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to NetApp’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Nakivo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 87 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

5,015 Views
2,995 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapCenter

Read 26 NetApp SnapCenter reviews

1,302 Views
864 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

NetApp SnapCenter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

NAKIVO Backup & Replication and NetApp SnapCenter are notable solutions for backup and replication. User reviews indicate higher satisfaction with NAKIVO in terms of pricing and support, while NetApp SnapCenter is considered superior in feature richness.

Features: Users appreciate that NAKIVO provides reliable VM backup and replication, quick recovery options, and seamless integration with various hypervisors. NetApp SnapCenter is valued for its comprehensive data protection for both physical and virtual environments and deep integration with NetApp technologies. NetApp offers more advanced features, giving it an edge in this area.

Room for Improvement: NAKIVO users suggest enhancing reporting features and improving the interface's intuitiveness. Users of NetApp SnapCenter note that the product could benefit from streamlined setup processes and better customer support. Both products have different areas for improvement, but NetApp's setup and support issues stand out more prominently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NAKIVO is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. NetApp SnapCenter's deployment is viewed as complex, with some users experiencing delays in customer support. NAKIVO appears to offer a more hassle-free experience in this regard.

Pricing and ROI: Users find NAKIVO's pricing to be competitive and its ROI substantial due to lower costs and efficient performance. NetApp SnapCenter's higher costs are justified by its robust features and integrations, with users acknowledging a good ROI despite the initial higher investment. NAKIVO is preferred for budget-conscious users, while NetApp SnapCenter is favored for its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. NetApp SnapCenter Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. NetApp SnapCenter

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (6th)

NetApp SnapCenter

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

36th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.6%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp SnapCenter is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Rahim Khasiyev

Founder at CAE LLC

Our clients tell us they appreciate the user-friendly interface and the space savings they realize from compression

Some of Nakivo's backup features need improvement. For example, I would like some more options for job scheduling. We can only schedule incremental and full backup, but there are no differential backup features in the same job. I can only schedule one incremental and one full backup in a week. I schedule three jobs for each repository, which is the simplest way to plan your jobs. It's possible to consolidate three jobs into one, but when you want to explain the backup registration schema to someone, they can't understand what they don't see. When you schedule some jobs, you should be able to see a list of the jobs contained within each. You have to open up the editor to see what is inside. You must click through and edit stuff. Each time, it asks you to save or discard changes. It's very annoying. You only see the name of the scheduled job, and you need to edit it to see what's it's inside.

Read full review

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Integrates well with various applications , provides a cloning feature for creating snapshots or clones of volume and a centralized command

It is basically centralized command control software. When the users visualize the workflow of the backup, the management and the customer storage administrator know the ins and outs of the backup and recovery. They can make the strategy for their backup and recovery and the certainty of their backups and restore. Strategic planning: Also, it is easy to make a strategy when you have visualized the inflow and outflow of the backup and recovery. With the CLI or native way, without any UI or management tool, you might not be able to create any strategy at all. This is especially important when you have multiple storage systems inside your data center or organization. You need a tool that connects and visualizes the workflow of the backup and recovery from all the storage systems and NetApp storage systems installed within the organization. It is very important when you have multiple storage systems, and you need to manage your backup and recovery workflow. Ease of Management: Unlike other storage vendors, NetApp has its own product called SnapCenter. Other vendors need to acquire third-party software or integrate with other software to manage storage systems. NetApp has its own solution, which is SnapCenter. NetApp's SnapCenter gels well with their storage systems and products. Ease of management is already there. It's a fine software with easy installation, management, and understanding. It's not a complicated software to understand.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It uses all the bandwidth available if not limited and backs up entire servers with all data about four times faster than Windows Server Backup and EaseUS TODO Backup."

"The features that we like the most are the Backup Copy and Active Directory Integration. They have helped us to save a lot of time since we do not have to make the backup copies “by hand”."

"It is easy to manage all of the individual backup jobs, check the status every day, and it can even send an email to keep us informed."

"You can have it setup and running within a few minutes."

"Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, saving times have been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction."

"All in all, NAKIVO helped us save a lot of time."

"We really appreciate the simplicity of the solution."

"Backups are working smoothly with Nakivo Backup."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

"The most valuable feature is that it's centralized. In the old SnapManager days, we had software for each server. Now, with a centralized system, we're able to manage all systems remotely, and all agents remotely, and update them remotely. That's a huge benefit for us."

"Being able to add everything in as resource groups is a valuable feature... Having all the SQL servers put into specific buckets, based on their year of release - 2008, 2012, 2014 - allows us to get almost immediate backups that are easily seen and reported on."

"The backup features are the most valuable because they allow the DBAs to replace SnapManager for Oracle (SMO), which is going away, and to do cloning as well. We can also clone to different servers and have the actual backup clone mounted on different servers. And we can split easily too."

"The central pane view is the most valuable feature. You have one console where you can monitor all your jobs, as opposed to going to different vCenters."

"The centralized GUI is the best feature, that there is only one webpage where we can see the states of all the backup jobs. We can see all the tasks that are running and we can quickly see if one fails; if they are running or have any issues. We have all that in one place."

"Technical support has been very helpful when we have issues."

"It's a centralized, easy-to-use solution empowering RBAC management, monitoring, notifications, extensive logging, and backup schedules for standalone as well as groups of the same types of environments. The cloning capabilities accelerate development."

"It's very helpful because SnapCenter is already integrated with VMware Snapshot, so it's very easy to use."

More NetApp SnapCenter pros

Cons

"Automatic updates do not work, and every update has to be done manually."

"I would like to see some additional models in the next release to make backups more functional."

"The only thing we have encountered that we would like to see improved in the future are error messages. They could be more detailed and helpful, without the need to send logs to support. Failing that, the part of the log related to the error could be displayed alongside the error message, so I can investigate the error without looking through all of those logs that I'm able to download."

"We want the backup job to consume fewer resources, as the utilization is very high if we choose the best compression."

"In the loading of a backup, choosing what to restore seems to be a lengthy process, but it has always worked in my restore tests."

"Right now we know that Nakivo has the ability to back up as an incremental process and restore backups across several criteria. However, it would be good if we had the ability to backup a system like PostgreSQL."

"I would love to see compatibility with KVM Backup."

"When you schedule some jobs, you should be able to see a list of the jobs contained within each. You have to open up the editor to see what is inside. You must click through and edit stuff. Each time, it asks you to save or discard changes. It's very annoying. You only see the name of the scheduled job, and you need to edit it to see what's it's inside."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

"It needs to support vSphere 6.7."

"There is one area that needs improvement and that's in the alerting. When you set up your SMTP alerts, it only has - and I don't understand why - the ability to send an anonymous SMTP. It doesn't do basic authentication, which frustrated me for a while until I figured out that I'm not missing something. It's just not there."

"I feel a little bit that during the whole process of putting this software into production we were like a beta program. It was full of bugs... For example, we had a problem with truncating our Exchange log files... It has improved over time."

"Reporting of the jobs could be better."

"Plugins should be developed in shorter times. Performance generally could be a little bit faster."

"SnapCenter could improve its integration with other backup solutions, such as Veeam."

"I have an issue with SnapCenter because sometimes a VM cannot be backed up... The way SnapCenter works is that it makes a backup of all the VMs and then it removes all the old backups. If one VM cannot be backed up for some reason, it has already created a new backup for all the VMs but it cannot remove the old backups. It ends up creating so many backups in VMware and it will cause a performance problem if the condition is not fixed."

"The GUI is still so-so. I' don't use the GUI that often anymore because it's really slow, refreshing disks, refreshing hosts, and you have to click a lot."

More NetApp SnapCenter cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The prices are high."

"It has a very good price in the market."

"It's really cheap, and our company saves a significant amount of money on IT backup solutions per year."

"The solution's pricing is adequate for its features and quality."

"The pricing, setup costs, and licensing are easy to understand, no matter how you want to implement it."

"The licensing model is crystal clear on the website."

"Nakivo has a good price-performance ratio."

"The licensing model is very affordable compared to competitors, with a good quality-to-cost ratio, and the software is quite simple and fast to setup."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

"It comes free with the amount of equipment we purchase from NetApp. In terms of pricing, zero is my favorite number."

"It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products."

"The product is inexpensive."

"The licensing is well-designed because it's already included in some packages with NetApp storage. Therefore, for most customers, it's okay as the SnapCenter license is already included in some NetApp bundles."

"The license for SnapCenter was included with the storage array."

"We have a site license, so it comes with the product."

"Pricing is very good because if you already have NepApp controllers, then it's included."

"We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nakivo?

NAKIVO Backup & Replication is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

Thoroughly assess your needs before purchasing the solution. Depending on how your data center operates, you will need to determine whether the licensing should be based on workload or socket. It’s...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp SnapCenter?

Most banks and financial institutions use the solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapCenter?

If you have a license, you don't need to buy anything extra. If you have multiple storage systems and want to manage them with a central tool, you are covered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapCenter?

There is always a chance for improvement. One thing that might be improved is the ease of management. It might be made a little less complicated.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 47% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 16% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 9% of the time

Zerto vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 6% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

Synology DSM vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 26% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 23% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 19% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 13% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 7% of the time

More NetApp SnapCenter Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

January 2025

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapCenter

January 2025

Download NetApp SnapCenter product report

Also Known As

No data available

SnapCenter

Overview

NAKIVO Backup & Replication is an all-inclusive data protection solution designed to ensure the availability, safety, and integrity of critical data across various environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, Nutanix AHV, AWS EC2, physical servers, and workstations. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of features tailored to meet the needs of IT professionals and business executives alike, ensuring robust data protection strategies that are both efficient and cost-effective.

Comprehensive Data Protection

NAKIVO Backup & Replication provides a wide array of features, including backup, replication, recovery, and failover for virtual, physical, and cloud environments. This ensures that businesses can protect their data across multiple platforms, reducing the risk of data loss and ensuring continuity in the face of various threats.

Enhanced Efficiency with Deduplication and Compression

The solution employs advanced deduplication and compression technologies to minimize storage requirements and optimize backup speeds. This not only reduces the storage footprint and costs but also accelerates backup and recovery processes, ensuring that businesses can quickly bounce back from data loss incidents.

Flexible Deployment Options

NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a variety of deployment options, including installation on Windows or Linux servers, deployment as a pre-configured virtual appliance, or running directly on NAS devices. This flexibility ensures that organizations can choose the deployment method that best suits their infrastructure and operational preferences.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication stands out as a versatile and reliable data protection solution, offering a comprehensive set of features designed to meet the complex demands of modern IT environments. By combining robust performance, ease of use, and cost-efficiency, it provides businesses of all sizes with the tools they need to protect their critical data assets, ensuring business continuity and compliance with data protection regulations.

Nakivo

Unified, scalable platform for application-consistent data protection and clone management. This software simplifies backup, restore, and clone lifecycle management with application-integrated workflows.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

All for One Steeb AG, Accenture

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. NetApp SnapCenter

January 2025

Free Report: NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. NetApp SnapCenter

Find out what your peers are saying about NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. NetApp SnapCenter and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. NetApp SnapCenter report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.