OneSpan DIGIPASS vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

OneSpan and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. OneSpan is ranked #22, while RSA is ranked #28. OneSpan holds a 1.7% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OneSpan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of RSA users who would recommend it.

OneSpan DIGIPASS

Read 1 OneSpan DIGIPASS review

797 Views
665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews

289 Views
244 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

OneSpan DIGIPASS

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OneSpan DIGIPASS and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.

To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OneSpan DIGIPASS

Ranking in Authentication Systems

22nd

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Ranking in Authentication Systems

28th

Average Rating

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of OneSpan DIGIPASS is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

it_user1406394

Technical Lead Specialist at Hitachi Systems, Ltd.

Oct 15, 2020

Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved

Many of the users with licenses are not getting their IPs all of the time. It seems that the licenses are not active on the user end. There are multiple errors. At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code. The user interface could be improved. The setup could be simplified. The mobile app that is available for Digipass does not scan the QR code to activate the license. Users would like to see more functions and creation options for the user base and the UI console. They are not getting all of the features that are available on the UI Console. The features are the same but they are not able to configure them.

Read full review

Andres Roldan

Security Architect at Fluid Attacks

Mar 21, 2019

It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs

We work for some banks in our country using this solution. We provide support with this specific version (7.1) We are a partner who is supporting the application for our customers. Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."

"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."

"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."

"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."

"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."

"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."

Cons

"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."

"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."

"It has taken years to implement."

"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."

"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."

"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."

"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."

"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."

"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."

"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

49%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Yubico YubiKey vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 34% of the time

Cisco Duo vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 18% of the time

RSA SecurID vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 10% of the time

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Competitors

RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 40% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 32% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 28% of the time

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

November 2024

Download OneSpan DIGIPASS product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

November 2024

Download RSA Adaptive Authentication product report

Also Known As

VASCO DIGIPASS, DIGIPASS

No data available

Learn More

OneSpan

RSA

Overview

DIGIPASS authenticators are the most effective first-line-of-defense and have a proven record of stopping hacking attacks.

RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.

Sample Customers

AGBank, Odeabank, Bradesco, Briggs and Morgan, Caixa Galicia, Chicago Clearing House Association, Diamond Bank Plc, DnB NOR, Document Centric Solutions

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.