Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenIAM Identity Governance vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

The compared OpenIAM and Ping Identity solutions aren't in the same category. OpenIAM is ranked #15 in UP , and holds a 1.2% mindshare in the category. Ping Identity is ranked #5 in AS , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenIAM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.
OpenIAM Identity Governance
Read 1 OpenIAM Identity Governance review
  • 235 Views
  • 195 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Ping Identity Platform
Read 28 Ping Identity Platform reviews
  • 3,180 Views
  • 2,318 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OpenIAM Identity Governance and Ping Identity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed User Provisioning Software Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
User Provisioning Software
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 823,795 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenIAM Identity Governance
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (15th), Identity Management (IM) (30th)
Ping Identity Platform
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (5th), Data Governance (6th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenIAM Identity Governance is designed for User Provisioning Software and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, down 1.8% compared to last year.
Ping Identity Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Authentication Systems, holds 3.9% mindshare, down 4.8% since last year.
User Provisioning Software
Authentication Systems
 

Q&A Highlights

it_user867039 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 16, 2018
OpenIAM vs Ping identity
Agree With Arnold Felderbaum's comment. Asking for the "battlecard" (not familiar with that term, but suspect you are asking about bakeoff results) is not going to help you, unless the respondant's business requirements are an exact match with your organization.
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

SM
Manages user identities and application access in a centralized way from a single console/portal
OpenIAM provides an Identity and Access Management platform which includes identity and access management (i.e., SSO, Multi-factor Authentication, password synchronization, and RBAC). Below are the features : Lower Cost of Implementation & Total Cost of Ownership: * OpenIAM uses tools, such as Groovy script to implement business rules, Grails to create new UI functionality, Activiti for workflow, PowerShell, etc. It also support web services. So it is important to find skilled technical resources readily and at reasonable cost in comparison to the large vendors, which use proprietary tools for developing custom connector or product customization as per business requirement. * OpenIAM is also based on Open Source technologies (i.e., JBoss, Apache, MySQL, CentOS), so Total Cost of Ownership is very low in comparison to other IAM products. * Compliance with standards simplifies integration. * Subscription-based license model. Ease of Use: OpenIAM offers a single unified Admin console and a single unified self-service portal for customers to use and manage the IAM suite (i.e. Identity Management, Access Management, and Multi-Factor Authentication). Modern Architecture: * Built from the ground up, not through acquisitions and proprietary technology. * SOA architecture * Cloud-enabled Enterprise Grade Product: Even though OpenIAM is based on Open Source technologies, it is: * Built on industry standards * Simplified integration * Uses established industry frameworks
Read full review
Dilip Reddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use but requires improvements in the area of stability
In my company, we have worked on authorization, and I know that there are different types of grants. We have worked on the authorization code, client credentials, and ROPC grant. There are two types of tokens, like the JWT token and internally managed reference tokens. JWT tokens are useful for finding information related to the claim requests. Internally managed reference tokens are useful for dealing with visual data and information. For the clients to fit the user information, they need to do additional work to fit all the user info into the site, which is to define and validate the token issue and provide the request for VPNs. I worked on the key differences between the authorization code and implicit grant. In the authorization code type, you will have the authorization code issued initially to the client, and the client has to exchange it with the authorization server, like using a DAC channel to get the access token. In implicit grants, tokens are issued right away if the application is a single-page application. We can either use the authorization code or an implicit grant.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

it_user867039 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 16, 2018
May 16, 2018
OpenIAM vs Ping identity
Agree With Arnold Felderbaum's comment. Asking for the "battlecard" (not familiar with that term, but suspect you are asking about bakeoff results) is not going to help you, unless the respondant's business requirements are an exact match with your organization.
2 out of 6 answers
it_user834495 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 15, 2018
There is a huge difference in between SSO and IAM. Don't confuse the 2 or you will be very disappointed. PING is SSO and partners with IAM providers while OpenIAM is a Identity Management System that provides SSO capabilities within its software. Single Signon is still managed by individual applications and AD. Our comparison was Okta and PING, but same concept.
Read full answer
it_user455748 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 15, 2018
Agreed. What are the business requirements?
Read full answer
See all 6 answers
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
11%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about PingID?
The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?
The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PingID?
The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

EVOLVEUM midPoint vs OpenIAM Identity Governance Logo
EVOLVEUM midPoint vs OpenIAM Identity Governance
Compared 46% of the time
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs OpenIAM Identity Governance Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs OpenIAM Identity Governance
Compared 16% of the time
Saviynt vs OpenIAM Identity Governance Logo
Saviynt vs OpenIAM Identity Governance
Compared 16% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs OpenIAM Identity Governance Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs OpenIAM Identity Governance
Compared 12% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenIAM Identity Governance Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenIAM Identity Governance
Compared 11% of the time
More OpenIAM Identity Governance Competitors
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 25% of the time
Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 11% of the time
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 6% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 6% of the time
More Ping Identity Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
User Provisioning Software
December 2024
OpenIAM Identity Governance reportDownload OpenIAM Identity Governance product report
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform
November 2024
Ping Identity Platform reportDownload Ping Identity Platform product report
 

Also Known As

OpenIAM, OpenIAM IGA
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Learn More

Video not available
OpenIAM
Ping Identity
 

Overview

The modern enterprise consists of both on-premise and cloud-based solutions often being utilized by users who are often geographically distributed. These users may also be a mix of employees, contractors, customers, vendors and so forth. OpenIAM Identity Governance (IGA) simplifies the way in which organizations manage identities across this complex landscape.

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
 

Sample Customers

Citicorp, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, Marsh and McLennan, SBC Warburg, GE Electric Insurance, Tata Communications, NettBuss, AMSCAN, Time Warner, MultiPlan, Stater Bros., County of Orange - California, TUI Hotels, NV Energy, EMCOR Group, Previred
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Buyer's Guide
User Provisioning Software
December 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.