Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs OpenText MBPM comparison

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText MBPM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText MBPM is ranked #36. OpenText 360 for SharePoint holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText MBPM’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText 360 for SharePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText MBPM users who would recommend it.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Read 15 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews
  • 533 Views
  • 361 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText MBPM
Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews
  • 343 Views
  • 187 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText MBPM enhance business processes and collaboration. OpenText MBPM has the upper hand due to its comprehensive process management capabilities, despite SharePoint's significant integration benefits.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides seamless integration with Microsoft environments, enabling efficient content collaboration, document management, and easy access to shared resources. OpenText MBPM offers advanced workflow automation, extensive process optimization tools, and powerful business process management capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive process automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint features an easy deployment model directly within the Microsoft ecosystem, with responsive customer support. OpenText MBPM involves a more complex setup process but includes robust support options that ensure smooth implementation and continuous operation.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers cost-effectiveness, especially for organizations using SharePoint, with substantial ROI through improved productivity and collaboration. OpenText MBPM, while having a higher initial cost, provides significant ROI due to its comprehensive automation capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
27th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText MBPM
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
36th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.3%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Ravi Krishnan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive
OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…
Read full review
Jaideep MS - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation
I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"Overall, I would rate OpenText 360 for SharePoint as ten."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
 

Cons

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."
"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
"The solution has a very complex pricing model."
"It has a reasonable price."
"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
"On-premises version is expensive"
"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
"SharePoint uses a subscription model."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."
"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Government
11%
Legal Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
15%
Insurance Company
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) suite, costing around five dollars per user. I am satisfied with the pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText MBPM?
On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with OpenText MBPM?
There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start wi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for OpenText MBPM?
We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get informatio...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Appian vs OpenText MBPM Logo
Appian vs OpenText MBPM
Compared 52% of the time
BizTalk Server vs OpenText MBPM Logo
BizTalk Server vs OpenText MBPM
Compared 48% of the time
More OpenText MBPM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
March 2025
OpenText 360 for SharePoint reportDownload OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
April 2025
OpenText MBPM reportDownload OpenText MBPM product report
 

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Metastorm BPM
 

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
OpenText
OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare
Buyer's Guide
OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM
April 2025
Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.