Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

OpenText and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5, while TIBCO is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Read 15 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews
  • 533 Views
  • 361 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews
  • 502 Views
  • 361 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM are business process management solutions. While OpenText is favored for pricing and support, TIBCO is preferred for its comprehensive features.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers seamless integration with SharePoint, enhanced collaboration tools, and effective document management. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM excels in advanced process management, sophisticated analytics, and extensive process modeling.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its analytics capabilities, improve custom workflow options, and provide more robust integration with non-Microsoft platforms. TIBCO could streamline its deployment process, improve its user interface, and reduce its complexity for simpler use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint is easy to deploy, especially for SharePoint users, and is known for efficient customer service. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, though complex to deploy, offers strong support for complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint has a lower initial cost, offering immediate ROI benefits, making it appealing for budget-conscious businesses. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, while requiring higher upfront investment, offers potential for greater long-term returns through its wide range of capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
27th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
32nd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.3%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Ravi Krishnan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive
OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…
Read full review
Ray Ochieng - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros
"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."
"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."
"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."
"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."
"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."
 

Cons

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons
"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."
"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The maintenance of the package could be improved."
"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."
"Technical support needs to be streamlined."
"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."
"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
"On-premises version is expensive"
"SharePoint uses a subscription model."
"The solution has a very complex pricing model."
"It has a reasonable price."
"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."
"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Government
11%
Legal Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
45%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) suite, costing around five dollars per user. I am satisfied with the pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API...
See all answers
What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 43% of the time
Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 33% of the time
IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 23% of the time
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
March 2025
OpenText 360 for SharePoint reportDownload OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report
Buyer's Guide
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
March 2025
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reportDownload TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report
 

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
No data available
 

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
OpenText
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.
TIBCO
 

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank
Buyer's Guide
OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
April 2025
Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.