Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

OpenText and Parasoft are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while Parasoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 5.9% mindshare in ALM, compared to Parasoft’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Read 205 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews
  • 6,936 Views
  • 2,849 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Parasoft Development Testin...
Read 4 Parasoft Development Testing Platform reviews
  • 165 Views
  • 118 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Parasoft Development Testing Platform and OpenText ALM / Quality Center are widely used tools for software testing and management. Based on user reviews, Parasoft Development Testing Platform appears to have an edge in support and pricing, though OpenText ALM / Quality Center stands out in feature richness and customer satisfaction.

Features: Parasoft Development Testing Platform receives high marks for its comprehensive set of testing tools, integration capabilities, and automation features. OpenText ALM / Quality Center is valued for its extensive test management features, robust reporting capabilities, and superior suite of features.

Room for Improvement: Users indicate that Parasoft Development Testing Platform could improve its performance speed and simplify its complexity. OpenText ALM / Quality Center users suggest enhancements in usability and more intuitive navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft Development Testing Platform is generally seen as easier to deploy, with users noting straightforward implementation and responsive support. OpenText ALM / Quality Center, while having more complex deployment, benefits from extensive documentation and a well-established support network.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft Development Testing Platform's pricing model and ROI are well-regarded. OpenText ALM / Quality Center has a higher price point, but users still find it worthwhile due to its extensive features and capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 825,661 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
OpenText ALM / Quality Center optimizes testing, enhances collaboration, reduces costs, and improves project efficiency and application traceability.
Sentiment score
6.8
The Parasoft Development Testing Platform improved code quality, reduced bugs, saved resources, and increased profitability by enhancing compliance and efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText ALM customer service is inconsistent, with mixed reviews on response times, expertise, and overall service quality.
Sentiment score
6.0
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is praised for knowledgeable, prompt support, effective communication, and helpful documentation, ensuring excellent customer service.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText ALM/Quality Center scales well, with stable performance for large user bases, but licensing may affect scalability costs.
Sentiment score
5.4
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is praised for its scalability, seamless integration, and robustness in handling large, complex projects.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText ALM/Quality Center is stable and reliable, with minor issues often linked to network or hardware constraints.
Sentiment score
6.9
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is praised for its stability, reliability, seamless integration, excellent support, and efficient performance under varied conditions.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText ALM faces challenges with expensive licenses, outdated UI, limited integration, and performance issues, hindering usability and efficiency.
Parasoft Development Testing Platform requires better integration, documentation, performance optimization, training resources, frequent updates, and responsive technical support.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft Development Testing Platform report
 

Setup Cost

OpenText ALM is costly, requiring careful evaluation and negotiation, but global license sharing and SaaS could reduce expenses.
Parasoft Development Testing Platform offers comprehensive capabilities with flexible pricing, noted for higher costs but robust support and training.
 

Valuable Features

OpenText ALM/Quality Center provides comprehensive traceability, integration, scalability, and secure management for lifecycle, test cases, and defects.
Users praise Parasoft for its strong reporting, automation, CI/CD integration, vulnerability detection, and customizable, intuitive workflows enhancing code quality.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft Development Testing Platform report
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
5th
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Parasoft Development Testin...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
16th
Ranking in Test Management Tools
18th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.9%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Development Testing Platform is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an initial setup phase that is easy to manage
The tool has some limitations for the dashboard, especially when it comes to 20 or 25 of them, which is sometimes not enough, and one may have to use a custom Excel to help extend the dashboard. The tool needs improvements since it is an old technology. OpenText ALM / Quality Center's improved version is ALM Octane but it does not support some of the traditional parts of the original product. Some of the traditional parts are missing in a lot of areas of OpenText ALM / Quality Center. It is difficult to directly transfer OpenText ALM / Quality Center to ALM Octane. Some of the classic OEMs have limitations, especially when used in an IDE network. There is a need for the tool to check where changes in UI or UX need to be made. The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.
Read full review
Ujjwal Gupta - PeerSpot reviewer
A complete test management tool that facilitates developers' unit testing
Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time. This would reduce the execution time, helping achieve goals on time, and with less effort required. I use the different licenses to manage this issue and it can be controlled by different users for functional testing.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
825,661 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
64%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The extract format is not ideal, splitting expected results into three line items, making interpretation difficult. Issues with mapping multiple functional test cases to one automated test case nee...
See all answers
What do you like most about Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
The most valuable feature is code coverage.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
The solution's speed has room for improvement.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 24% of the time
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 22% of the time
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 14% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 11% of the time
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 5% of the time
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
December 2024
OpenText ALM / Quality Center reportDownload OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
December 2024
Parasoft Development Testing Platform reportDownload Parasoft Development Testing Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
 

Learn More

OpenText
Parasoft
 

Overview

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

 

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform
January 2025
Free Report: OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
825,661 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.