OpenText MBPM and ProcessMaker compete in the business process management domain, providing tools to optimize workflows. OpenText MBPM holds an edge due to its comprehensive capabilities, whereas ProcessMaker offers more accessibility and value through flexible pricing.
Features: OpenText MBPM provides robust audit trails, comprehensive compliance capabilities, and extensive data management suited for enterprises with regulatory needs. ProcessMaker is known for intuitive process modeling, extensive integrations, and adaptability, making it user-friendly for businesses.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText MBPM requires more resources to implement due to its extensive features but is supported by strong customer service. ProcessMaker offers a straightforward deployment model allowing quick adoption and is backed by supportive services.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText MBPM involves higher initial costs but delivers ROI through its advanced features for large-scale operations. ProcessMaker's cost-effective pricing and efficient deployment ensure quicker ROI, appealing to smaller businesses or those with budget constraints.
ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.