OpenText UFT Developer vs Qualitia Automation Studio comparison

OpenText and Qualitia Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while Qualitia Software is ranked #33. OpenText holds a 2.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qualitia Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qualitia Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Developer

Read 37 OpenText UFT Developer reviews

1,860 Views
1,266 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Qualitia Automation Studio

Read 5 Qualitia Automation Studio reviews

209 Views
89 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Developer

Qualitia Automation Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Qualitia Automation Studio and OpenText UFT Developer compete in the test automation category. OpenText UFT Developer is leading due to its robust features and capabilities, even though it might cost more initially.

Features: Qualitia Automation Studio is recognized for its scriptless automation, quick test creation, and easy integration. OpenText UFT Developer provides rich scripting flexibility, support for numerous technologies, and seamless CI/CD pipeline integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualitia Automation Studio offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring rapid implementation and support. OpenText UFT Developer has a full-featured deployment process with comprehensive documentation and dedicated support, although it can be more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Qualitia Automation Studio presents a competitive setup cost and favorable ROI due to efficient test development and execution time. OpenText UFT Developer, while possibly costlier upfront, delivers significant ROI through improved test coverage and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qualitia Automation Studio Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qualitia Automation Studio

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Developer

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (13th)

Qualitia Automation Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.4%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualitia Automation Studio is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Bosri

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Efficient recording feature shines amid expected desktop and website enhancements

Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…

Read full review

it_user189918

QA Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Good Tool for Non Technical Users.

I think Qualitia's scriptless test automation tool is best used on teams that have Manual QA Testers who are looking to start to automate regression tests but are not very technical in nature. I think recognizing the overall strategy of implementing a test automation solution is extremely important when choosing a tool. If the tests are just going to be run from a local machine, then maybe a full solution like this is not what you need. But if you want to run tests on different servers and have them included in your build process, then a solution like Qualitia would help your team out. Just remember that Qualitia's technical support team is really something that will set their product apart from other similar solutions. They really do care about their customers success.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

"One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly."

"In UFT, it's a simple click to insert the checkpoints."

"The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases."

"It is quite stable, and it has got very user-friendly features, which are important in terms of maintaining our scripts from a long-term perspective. It is very stable for desktop-based, UI-based, and mobile applications. Object repositories and other features are also quite good."

"The solution helps to accelerate software testing automation. It will help to reduce lead time and increase productivity and efficiency."

"One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library."

"It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE."

More OpenText UFT Developer pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."

Cons

"It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support."

"We push one button and the tests are completely executed at once, so just have to analyze and say it's okay. It would be nice if this could be entirely automated."

"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

"Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful."

"Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls. I faced challenges with schedulers and calendars."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years."

"The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites."

More OpenText UFT Developer cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

More OpenText UFT Developer pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Insurance Company

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites. It is also suggested that the design and some functionality could be better.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 60% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 20% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Qualitia Automation Studio

Compared 100% of the time

More Qualitia Automation Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer

March 2025

Download OpenText UFT Developer product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2025

Download Qualitia Automation Studio product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

No data available

Overview

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.

OpenText

Qualitia gives you simple step wise approach to quickly build your test automation and handle complexities easily with its unique scriptless approach. Qualitia gives you smart alerts and analysis to adopt changes effectively, making it agile friendly.

Qualitia Software

Sample Customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qualitia Automation Studio

March 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qualitia Automation Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qualitia Automation Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qualitia Automation Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.