Oracle BPM vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.6. Oracle holds a 1.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,548 Views
1,275 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

7,158 Views
4,725 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the business process management category. Based on feature comparisons, Oracle BPM may be more suitable for developers due to its integration tools and comprehensive solution, while SAP Signavio stands out for its user-friendly collaboration capabilities, making it ideal for business-centric users.

Features: Oracle BPM offers excellent integration with databases and applications, supporting BPMN 2.0 for effective dynamic and static process management. It is appreciated for its ease of use, rich out-of-the-box features, and compliance with industry standards. SAP Signavio Process Manager excels with its simple interface, strong business process modeling capabilities, and the collaborative features of the Collaboration Hub, which enhance transparency and user collaboration.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BPM could improve its complex tools such as ADF, enhance user interfaces, and offer process mining and discovery. SAP Signavio Process Manager could enhance its collaborative functions, improve integration with process intelligence, and better support non-English languages. Competitive pricing is also a concern for some users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPM offers on-premises deployment options, appealing to businesses desiring control but adding complexity. Customer service feedback is mixed. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers flexible deployment across public and private clouds, supporting hybrid IT environments. Users value its responsive customer service but suggest improvements for complex technical support queries.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPM's high pricing and complex licensing, especially on virtualized platforms, can be a barrier, though users see ROI benefits in sectors like government. SAP Signavio Process Manager has varied pricing, yet is considered expensive by some, particularly after joining SAP. Despite this, its business process harmonization provides efficiency gains, making it a valuable investment for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 837,501 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

14th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Oracle BPM is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.4%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Neilsen Seixas

Owner at NSTEC

Enables robust integration capabilities, facilitating seamless connection with various systems and applications

We utilized Oracle BPM to automate various administrative processes within our organization, specifically focusing on eliminating paper-based workflows related to licensing procedures in our environment. Oracle BPM enabled collaboration between our IT and business teams for effective process management. Utilizing the Oracle VPN, we experienced significant improvements in process efficiency. For instance, a process that previously took forty days before implementation was reduced to just twenty minutes after implementing Oracle BPM. This remarkable reduction in time demonstrates the substantial benefits brought about by the solution. The solution is comprehensive, encompassing modeling, implementation, and runtime capabilities. Additionally, by leveraging this platform, we seamlessly integrated Oracle Portal and Oracle Document Management, providing a complete solution within the Oracle ecosystem. The integration capabilities of Oracle BPM with other systems significantly influenced our workflow. Our workflow was impacted positively by these integrations. Initially, we utilized Oracle BPM alongside other Oracle products such as Oracle Context Manager, Oracle Portal, and Oracle Document Management. Despite using multiple products, they are seamlessly integrated, providing a comprehensive solution for our clients. This solution encompassed document management, workflow control, process execution, and automation, effectively streamlining processes and eliminating bureaucratic hurdles. The transparency and efficiency achieved through this integrated approach were highly beneficial for our clients.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides extensive functionalities."

"It is quite scalable and can be applied to enterprise-level organizations effectively."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."

"The support is good."

"It is easy to use in a business processing suite."

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."

More Oracle BPM pros

"The Collaboration Hub is especially useful for collaborative tasks and ensuring transparency across teams."

"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."

"We can use workflow manager to create forms."

"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."

"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The fact that the repository is available on the web is the most valuable feature. It's a very simple tool. If you can use something simple and visual, you should be able to use the model as well in Signavio. It has the ability, for example, to track versioning control, so if you make updates to the processes, you have the ability to track the versions as well."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager is very responsive."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"The solution's licensing cost is very high."

"Oracle BPM should allow integration with external, common APIs."

"It would be good if they could provide some additional connectors or an application developer environment for microservices."

"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."

"Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter."

"Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption."

"You have to maintain it manually."

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

More Oracle BPM cons

"The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."

"It would be beneficial to have a defined leveling or hierarchy system to facilitate better understanding and analysis. More openness and flexibility would enhance its capabilities."

"I would like to be able to link a single word within a textual description directly to the glossary."

"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."

"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."

"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."

"There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"We received the product packaged into the Oracle database solution."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

"I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"The pricing is very expensive."

"It's pried high, this solution is expensive."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 29% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 6% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Oracle BPM

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 26% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

February 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Oracle Business Process Management

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Free Report: Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.