Oracle BPM vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6. Oracle holds a 1.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,499 Views
1,196 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 60 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

6,919 Views
4,526 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the business process management category. Based on feature comparisons, Oracle BPM may be more suitable for developers due to its integration tools and comprehensive solution, while SAP Signavio stands out for its user-friendly collaboration capabilities, making it ideal for business-centric users.

Features: Oracle BPM offers excellent integration with databases and applications, supporting BPMN 2.0 for effective dynamic and static process management. It is appreciated for its ease of use, rich out-of-the-box features, and compliance with industry standards. SAP Signavio Process Manager excels with its simple interface, strong business process modeling capabilities, and the collaborative features of the Collaboration Hub, which enhance transparency and user collaboration.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BPM could improve its complex tools such as ADF, enhance user interfaces, and offer process mining and discovery. SAP Signavio Process Manager could enhance its collaborative functions, improve integration with process intelligence, and better support non-English languages. Competitive pricing is also a concern for some users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPM offers on-premises deployment options, appealing to businesses desiring control but adding complexity. Customer service feedback is mixed. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers flexible deployment across public and private clouds, supporting hybrid IT environments. Users value its responsive customer service but suggest improvements for complex technical support queries.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPM's high pricing and complex licensing, especially on virtualized platforms, can be a barrier, though users see ROI benefits in sectors like government. SAP Signavio Process Manager has varied pricing, yet is considered expensive by some, particularly after joining SAP. Despite this, its business process harmonization provides efficiency gains, making it a valuable investment for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Oracle BPM is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.7%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

SatyajitSethy

Architect at Netcracker

Provides a complete workflow from testing to production and can handle a million concurrent requests

The user interface is very good. Once you understand it, it's easy to define rules and do any configurations. It comes with an embedded WebLogic application server, which you have to deploy automatically. Once you run the given binary, it will automatically keep everything on the backend. You'll have to create an instant database, and maintain or manage it based on the rules engine. After that, your system is ready to test. The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production. Throughout the testing, everything was good. Many customers are interested in the rules engine. A lot of requests pass through BPM because it's integrated with a lot of other applications or sub-applications.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."

"The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work."

"The support is good."

"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."

"It is easy and cheap."

"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."

More Oracle BPM pros

"It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again."

"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."

"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."

"The features I find most valuable are ease of use and the Collaboration Hub."

"It's easy and fast. It's very quick to work with process teams in terms of improving processes. You just have to send them a URL and to have a process in front of them. I don't use all of the possibilities we have in Signavio. This has made it easier for people to adopt, because when we scrambled the process team together and started a process of improvement, it improved their process. They are much more involved than they had been earlier, and they can also use Signavio to make smaller improvements in the process for themselves. There are many more interactions between the process teams and Signavio than in our previous solution, where you had to hire in a professional process modeler. It's been a great improvement."

"It is a stable solution."

"The benefit of this application is that I can immediately describe processes and form normative documents for these processes. For me, this is definitely a plus. Сurrently, I work in a company that is not involved in the structural alignment of business processes. They have huge gaps in this. Nothing is described and there are no norms. Therefore, the formation of regulatory documents, rules, and descriptions of processes, not only in graphic form, but also in documentary form is an absolute plus. I have not found this in other process programs."

"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."

"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."

"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."

"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."

"It would be good if they could provide some additional connectors or an application developer environment for microservices."

More Oracle BPM cons

"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."

"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."

"The tool's navigation could be improved."

"There is a lot of room for improvement. We've submitted a lot of OSS requests for special inputs we need, like glossary or dictionary entries in Quick Model. Currently, that's not functional."

"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."

"I think the intuitive handling is an issue which they should be more focused on, especially as we have issues with the glossary. If you want to implement Signavio within procedures in contact with other software, it's quite difficult to integrate and you will have several points where you have to double and triple the work, because you cannot maintain the data centrally. With other solutions, we can integrate it and have only one data transfer, to import and export with other solutions. A glossary is still limiting us."

"Its reporting feature could have customization options."

"It would be beneficial to have a defined leveling or hierarchy system to facilitate better understanding and analysis. More openness and flexibility would enhance its capabilities."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's pried high, this solution is expensive."

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

"The licensing model is good."

"Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is very expensive."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 27% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Oracle BPM

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 31% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

April 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Oracle Business Process Management

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.