Oracle CRM vs Zeta Marketing Platform comparison

"Shifting from traditional licensing and monthly maintenance fees to a subscription-based, pay-as-you-use model offers several advantages. This approach only charges me for my transactions, aligning costs with business performance. As my company grows, the software provider's revenue grows proportionally to the increased usage. The cost and suitability of Oracle CRM depend on factors like location, industry, and compliance needs. It may be more common for US companies to use Oracle CRM and European ones to use SAP."

"Oracle is very expensive, but you have to pay to get this kind of scalability and database flexibility."

"We have annual licenses to use this solution that are quite expensive. For example, we have approximately four types of licenses and we have one annual contract for the number of licenses we use for Oracle CRM and the loyalty system."

"The product’s pricing is very high."

"The solution is expensive."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Compared to alternative solutions Oracle CRM is expensive."

"The pricing for licensing is pretty expensive. If you need one particular feature it becomes expensive to have to continue paying for it."