Oracle Database In-Memory vs SingleStore comparison

The compared Oracle and SingleStore solutions aren't in the same category. Oracle is ranked #4 in EDS , with an average rating of 8.8, and holds a 10.5% mindshare in the category. SingleStore is ranked #17 in DS , and holds a 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SingleStore users who would recommend it.

Oracle Database In-Memory

Read 33 Oracle Database In-Memory reviews

1,592 Views
669 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SingleStore

Read 6 SingleStore reviews

2,429 Views
437 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database In-Memory

SingleStore

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SQLite, SAP, Firebird and others in Embedded Database.

To learn more, read our detailed Embedded Database Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Embedded Database

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,103 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Database In-Memory

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (4th), Relational Databases Tools (10th)

SingleStore

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (17th), Vector Databases (17th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Databases solutions, they serve different purposes. Oracle Database In-Memory is designed for Embedded Database and holds a mindshare of 10.5%, up 7.8% compared to last year.
SingleStore, on the other hand, focuses on Database as a Service (DBaaS), holds 2.9% mindshare, up 1.6% since last year.

Embedded Database Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Database In-Memory	10.5%
SQLite	21.6%
Firebird SQL	16.6%
Other	51.3%

Embedded Database

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SingleStore	2.9%
Amazon RDS	13.5%
MongoDB Atlas	12.3%
Other	71.3%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Real-time analytics have transformed response times and support huge data volumes with compression

I do not have any comment related to the improvement of the solution; for sure, it needs improvement, but for my use cases, it is very sufficient, and I think for the biggest companies, it needs a very powerful infrastructure. The area where improvement is required the most in the product is the UI. The problem with the UI is that it is not complex for understanding, but it needs some training to know what each button does, how it works, and the many variables needed.

Read full review

Vignesh KR

Solution Architect at Wipro Limited

An excellent choice for diverse data processing needs with exceptional in-memory capabilities, robust failover mechanisms, easy scalability and high performance

Scalability is its key strength. Adding servers for scalability is a straightforward process involving simply incorporating a few additional servers and recycling the cluster triggers automatic repartitioning and redistribution of data. For instance, if the initial database creation involved a hundred servers and later, four more servers are added, specific commands can be executed to increase the partitions to one hundred twenty. The data is then efficiently redistributed across the expanded partitions without the need for manual data movement, ensuring a seamless and efficient scalability process. In my current organization, approximately three projects involve the usage of SingleStore, with a team size ranging from ten to twenty individuals.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability is very good."

"Security is the most valuable feature."

"We have recently deployed our database on cloud with Oracle Database In-Memory; we have a single standby on cloud, and on contingency occasions, we switch over to cloud and use it for four to five months."

"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"

"I like Oracle because it is a backward-compatible solution."

"The solution's ROI is excellent."

"We use the tool for real-time data transfer for risk management purposes. In a trading system, conversions happen fast. We use the product to handle fast transactions with low latency."

"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines."

"The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown."

"The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms."

"MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."

"It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data."

"The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed."

Cons

"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."

"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The product could benefit from enhancements in its graphical user interface."

"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."

"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."

"The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."

"The dashboard requires some refreshment or configuration improvements."

"They should lower the price. My customers think that it's too expensive."

More Oracle Database In-Memory cons

"Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial."

"We don't get good discounts in Pakistan."

"It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks."

"For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback."

"Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally."

"There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."

"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."

"The solution's pricing is high."

"The pricing is pretty good so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."

"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."

"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."

"I rate the pricing a zero out of ten because Database In-Memory is too costly."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pricing and cost advice

"The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."

"Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."

"SingleStore is a bit expensive."

"I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."

"They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded Database solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?

We can integrate it with any data sources as well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?

The pricing for Oracle Database In-Memory is more affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 10% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 10% of the time

DuckDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 9% of the time

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 6% of the time

Druid vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Database In-Memory Competitors

ClickHouse vs SingleStore

Compared 7% of the time

Supabase Vector vs SingleStore

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs SingleStore

Compared 6% of the time

CockroachDB vs SingleStore

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs SingleStore

Compared 5% of the time

More SingleStore Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory

January 2026

Download Oracle Database In-Memory product report

Buyer's Guide

SingleStore

January 2026

Download SingleStore product report

Overview

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

SingleStore delivers the performance you need for enterprise AI, providing the most performant data platform for apps and analytics at scale. SingleStore enables organizations to scale from one to one million customers in one unified platform. SingleStore offers transparent pricing as shown here https://www.singlestore.com/pricing/

SingleStore caters to over 400 customers globally, including major banks and tech companies in 50+ countries and 40+ verticals. It offers seamless scaling for both transactional and analytical workloads, simplifying data management with its MySQL compatibility and real-time processing capabilities. SingleStore's distributed architecture ensures speed and reliability, efficiently handling large data volumes.

What are the key features of SingleStore?

MySQL Compatibility: Eases the learning curve for users.
Built-in Pipelines: Connects to S3, Kafka, and more.
High Concurrency: Processes billions of records swiftly.
Replication & Failover: Enhances speed and reliability.
In-memory Storage: Ensures data safety and quick access.

What benefits can users find in SingleStore reviews?

Automatic Reconfiguration: Simplifies management tasks.
Impressive SQL Performance: Supports complex queries efficiently.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with a multi-node setup.

Top banks and fintech companies leverage SingleStore for efficient management of financial data, while media and telecom industries use it for scalable metadata management and improved data processing. Retail and eCommerce sectors benefit from enhanced transactional capabilities, reducing the need for separate databases and optimizing reporting processes. SingleStore's capacity to unite diverse workloads makes it a strategic choice across many sectors.

SingleStore

Sample Customers

Shanghai Customs

400+ customers including: 6sense, Adobe, Akamai, Ant Money, Arcules, CARFAX, Cigna, Cisco, Comcast, DELL, DBS Bank, Dentsu, DirectlyApply, EY, Factors.AI, Fathom Analytics, FirstEnergy, GE, Goldman Sachs, Heap, Hulu, IMAX, impact.com, Kroger, LG, LiveRamp, Lumana, Nvidia, OpenDialog, Outreach, Palo Alto Networks, PicPay, RBC, Samsung, SegMetrics, Siemens, SiteImprove, SiriusXM, SK Telecom, SKAI, SONY, STC, SunRun, TATA, Thorn, ZoomInfo.

Find out what your peers are saying about SQLite, SAP, Firebird and others in Embedded Database. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Embedded Database reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.