No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs Percona Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service
Ranking in Open Source Databases
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (14th)
Percona Server
Ranking in Open Source Databases
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 2.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Percona Server is 2.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Percona Server2.4%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service2.0%
Other95.6%
Open Source Databases
 

Featured Reviews

RS
Director at Adamos Tecnologia
Efficiently manages extensive datasets with rapid connections and wide tool support
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install. It does not require a DBA for management. The connections are very fast and it supports several thousand users simultaneously without any issues. New connections do not hang server operations. As soon as new releases are put out, they work as expected. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is supported by every vendor and tool, including architectural, integration, and generation tools, offering wide protocol support. This makes Oracle MySQL Cloud Service a valuable solution.
Pieter Geelen - PeerSpot reviewer
Freelancer at geelen.io
Reliable open-source database has supported our migration and improved e-commerce performance
Percona Server seems great to me overall. If I had to think of any small area for improvement for Percona Server, it would be around the proxy story. When adding a proxy to manage traffic better, we first tried SQL Proxy, but it never really worked for us, which was unfortunate because SQL Proxy offers better optimizations for read performance. We did have success with HAProxy, but it works on a network level, while SQL Proxy was designed to be SQL-aware and distribute parts of the query across the database cluster. The performance gain we were hoping for with SQL Proxy did not materialize, so we remained on the network level with HAProxy. Databases can be finicky regarding the performance they need. We had some disk I/O latency issues, which led us to use different types of nodes in our Kubernetes cluster where we provisioned Percona Server explicitly. There is a lot of IOPS happening under the hood, and while I suspect the application was not very efficient, it was also challenging to identify that we were experiencing performance issues due to disk performance. It would be helpful to clarify the metrics related to disk I/O latency so we could understand where our bottlenecks are.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Having multiple reliable databases has improved our business greatly because having a robust database is so integral to the company in general."
"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."
"The product is good for tuning."
"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."
"The simplicity of the solution is very good; it's a straightforward solution and makes for a very good cloud option."
"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install."
"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."
"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."
"Percona Server has positively impacted my organization by reducing downtime for applications and improving backup capabilities."
"Percona Server has positively impacted my organization by improving many areas, as it has reduced database licensing concerns, allowing us to now operate as an enhanced MySQL environment without moving to a proprietary database platform."
"The best feature that Percona Server offers is that it was free."
"Percona Server's scalability is very strong, as it features thread pooling for over 10,000 connections, scales out horizontally, and comes with XtraDB Cluster and ProxySQL, making it very effective."
"Percona Server's performance when handling large data sets was significant compared to regular MySQL, and it was excellent."
"I consider Percona Server to be MySQL Enterprise on steroids without licensing fees or restrictions, and it performs exceptionally well."
"After switching to Percona Server, we were able to resolve those issues quickly."
"We find the product mostly stable."
 

Cons

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."
"It could be more user-friendly, but that depends on the user's technical skills."
"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."
"Improvement could be made in the workflow, particularly when it comes to making changes or implementing certain functions."
"The technical support is in need of improvement."
"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."
"Relational databases, in general, are not known to be as scalable as NoSQL databases."
"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."
"If Percona had flashback capabilities, it would be ideal."
"Percona Server can be improved because administration can still be complex, requiring database expertise, and broader built-in visualization would be beneficial along with more beginner-friendly management."
"Percona Server can be improved by addressing the lag between releasing new versions of MySQL and its Percona support, and also by enhancing the configuration of performance variables to provide more user-friendly and easier to configure options."
"Percona Server could be improved by adding more advanced query fields, which would be very helpful."
"I would like to add that the user interface is very crowded, which makes it challenging for new engineers to know where to turn, so I had to sit down and understand the documentation before I was able to manage the application myself."
"I have limited experience to provide detailed insights about needed improvements."
"If I had to think of any small area for improvement for Percona Server, it would be around the proxy story."
"I also think there should be more use cases and documentation on deploying in Kubernetes with real-life examples, as currently, the documentation is minimal, making it difficult in a production situation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source product."
"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."
"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."
"The product is expensive."
"The license is expensive."
"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."
"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
24%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?
I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...
What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...
What is your primary use case for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?
I work in finance, financial services, banking, and financial services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Percona Server?
Since I used the free tier, my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that it was the best model available at the time.
What needs improvement with Percona Server?
I have limited experience to provide detailed insights about needed improvements. Visibility and advertisement are the improvements I think Percona Server needs.
What is your primary use case for Percona Server?
I was using Percona Server as a MySQL database replacement for an application that needed a database in the background to manage tasks.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies
Pricefalls Marketplace, Micpoint, Rent the Runway, Transmart, Wattpad, Singular Group, Invoca, 3E
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. Percona Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.