Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

Palo Alto Networks and F5 are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Read 26 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

3,001 Views
2,025 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Read 8 Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reviews

88% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 29, 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention are competing in cloud security. Palo Alto Networks has the upper hand due to its robust features, despite Threat Stack's competitive pricing and support.

Features: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides efficient real-time cloud security monitoring, comprehensive compliance management, and effective endpoint security monitoring. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is noted for advanced malware detection, cutting-edge threat intelligence capabilities, and extensive threat prevention features.

Room for Improvement: Threat Stack could improve with more emphasis on customer service support, enhance its deployment process, and include more advanced features. Palo Alto Networks could lower its initial investment cost, improve user interface intuitiveness for beginners, and offer more integration capabilities with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention ensures seamless deployment with strong customer support, facilitating a smooth implementation process. Threat Stack’s deployment is straightforward but lacks strong post-deployment support, presenting a potential gap in this area.

Pricing and ROI: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is appreciated for its competitive setup costs, offering promising ROI with value-driven security solutions. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI through long-term value and enhanced security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (7th)

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Carlos Bracamonte

Senior Network Support Engineer at Amadeus

Robust, reliable, simple to install and good technical support

We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection. I'm not sure what the remaining threat protection features are off the top of my head. But beyond that, we use URL filtering. We have three approved cases for using external dynamic lists that are stored in a bucket repository. Then, for each URL site that needs to be whitelisted, we add it to the external dynamic list in order to gain access to this email. I would like Wildfire to be implemented. We use the equivalent in Cisco is the integration policies. We have the Wildfire but we are not currently implementing it. We don't have the license to use it, but we are not currently implementing it until we present the use cases that the company gives some value to and they approve the use of it.

Read full review

Skyler Cain

Software Development Manager at Rent Dynamics

SecOps program for us, as a smaller company, is amazing; they know what to look for

They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter. Even as part of the SecOps Program, that could be helpful; a quick analysis. They're analyzing our whole infrastructure and saying, "You have one VPC and that doesn't make a lot of sense, that should be multiple VPCs and here's why." The architecture of the servers in whatever cloud-hosting provider you're on could be helpful. Other than that, they should continue to expand on their notifications and on what's a vulnerability. They do a great job of that and we want them to continue to do that. It would be cool, since the agent is already deployed and they know about the server, they know the IP address, and they know what vulnerability is there, for them to test the vulnerability and see if they can actually exploit it. Or, once we patch it, they could double-check that it can't be. I don't know how hard that would be to build. Thinking on it off the top off my head, it could be a little challenging but it could also be highly interesting. It would also be great if we could test a couple of other features like hammering a server with 100 login attempts and see what happens. Real test scenarios could be really helpful. That is probably more something close to what they do with the SOC 2 audit or the report. But more visualization of that, being able to test things out on our infrastructure to make sure we can or can't hit this box could be interesting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It effectively prevents malware, ransomware, and other attacks."

"It's very easy to use and configure. What is nice about Palo Alto is that even if you don't understand how to use it, you can just click on upload and upload everything that needs to be blocked."

"It's a monster, it's got so many beautiful features. We do deal with other firewalls and we've got a better idea of what other firewalls' capabilities are, any comparison with the Palo Alto I liked the quality of service on the applications that you can control the amount of bandwidth an application is allowed to consume. The best feature is the quality of the application quality of service."

"The user interface is a bit more professional than some free products."

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the market leader as far as security gateways and endpoint protection. Additionally, the threat database that is used is one of the best."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."

"I like the solution's interface."

"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros

"The rules are really great. They give us more visibility and control over what's being triggered. There's a large set of rules that come out-of-the-box. We can customize them and we can create our own rules based on the traffic patterns that we see."

"With Threat Stack, we quickly identified some AWS accounts which had services that would potentially be exposed and were able to remediate them prior to release of products."

"The most valuable feature is the SecOps because they have our back and they help us with the reports... It's like having an extension of your team. And then, it grows with you."

"Threat Stack has connectivity."

"It has been quite helpful to have the daily alerts coming to my email, as well as the Sev 1 Alerts... We just went through a SOX audit and those were pivotal."

"It is scalable. It deploys easily with curl and yum."

"Every other security tool we've looked is good at containers, or at Kubernetes, is good at AWS, or at instance monitoring. But nobody is good at tying all of those things together, and that's really where Threat Stack shines."

"The number-one feature is the monitoring of interactive sessions on our Linux machines. We run an immutable environment, so that nothing is allowed to be changed in production... We're constantly monitoring to make sure that no one is violating that. Threat Stack is what allows us to do that."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] pros

Cons

"The initial setup is complex."

"Generally, to deploy it will take some downtime, about a day."

"The installation was complicated."

"We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection."

"Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly."

"It's not so easy to set up a test environment, because it's not so easy to get the test license. The vendor only gives you 90 days for a test license; it's a tough license to get."

"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly."

"Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons

"The compliance and governance need improvement."

"It shoots back a lot of alerts."

"Some features do not work as expected."

"The solution’s ability to consume alerts and data in third-party tools (via APIs and export into S3 buckets) is moderate. They have some work to do in that area... The API does not mimic the features of the UI as far as reporting and pulling data out go. There's a big discrepancy there."

"The one thing that we know they're working on, but we don't have through the tool, is the application layer. As we move to a serverless environment, with AWS Fargate or direct Lambda, that's where Threat Stack does not have the capacity to provide feed. Those are areas that it's blind to now..."

"The user interface can be a little bit clunky at times... There's a lot of information that needs to be waded through, and the UI just isn't great."

"The API - which has grown quite a bit, so we're still learning it and I can't say whether it still needs improvement - was an area that had been needing it."

"They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."

"Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."

"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."

"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."

"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."

"The pricing could be lower."

"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."

"From one to ten, with one being the most expensive, I would rate the pricing of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a one out of ten. It is my understanding that Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the most expensive one."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice

"Pricing seems to be in line with the market structure. It's fine."

"It came in cheaper than Trend Micro when we purchased it a few years ago."

"We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided."

"It is a cost-effective choice versus other solutions on the market."

"It is very expensive compared to some other products. The pricing is definitely high."

"What we're paying now is somewhere around $15 to $20 per agent per month, if I recall correctly. The other cost we have is SecOps."

"I'm happy with the amount that we spend for the product that we get and the overall service that we get. It's not cheap, but I'm still happy with the spend."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

It is a stable product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

The pricing is competitive, and with current campaigns and discounts, it provides an excellent device for a reasonable price.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 17% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 13% of the time

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 9% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 31% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

February 2025

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

February 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report

Download Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Threat Stack, CSP,

Overview

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?

Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.

What are the benefits and ROI features?

Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

Sample Customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

February 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.