Panaya Test Dynamix vs PractiTest comparison

Panaya and PractiTest are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Panaya is ranked #20, while PractiTest is ranked #18. Panaya holds a 2.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to PractiTest’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Panaya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

266 Views
147 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

255 Views
175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

PractiTest and Panaya Test Dynamix are two leading test management solutions. Panaya Test Dynamix outperforms PractiTest in features and deployment ease. However, PractiTest is better in pricing and user support, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users.

Features: PractiTest offers end-to-end test management capabilities, integration options, and detailed reporting. Panaya Test Dynamix provides defect prediction, automation capabilities, and intuitive management functionalities. Panaya Test Dynamix has more advanced features compared to PractiTest, making it preferred for users requiring sophisticated tools.

Room for Improvement: PractiTest requires enhancements in performance speed and additional automation integration. Users also suggest improvements in user interface design. Panaya Test Dynamix needs smoother navigation and better customization features. Additionally, there are calls for more extensive documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PractiTest has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Panaya Test Dynamix has a more complex deployment process but high-quality customer support after setup.

Pricing and ROI: PractiTest is found cost-effective with substantial ROI due to its affordability and functionality. Panaya Test Dynamix is more expensive with a rich feature set that justifies the higher cost, leading to a satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Panaya Test Dynamix vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. PractiTest

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Test Management Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (6th), Functional Testing Tools (27th), Regression Testing Tools (13th)

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 2.6%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 2.6%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

Cons

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

16%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 69% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 13% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 8% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 29% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 24% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 18% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

March 2025

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Overview

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Panaya

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. PractiTest

March 2025

Free Report: Panaya Test Dynamix vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.