Parasoft SOAtest vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Parasoft and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Parasoft is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.0, while PortSwigger is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Parasoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

997 Views
632 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 62 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

4,974 Views
3,276 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offer solutions in software testing and web security. PortSwigger leads due to its unmatched security features and ROI benefit for penetration testers.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides comprehensive API testing, automation capabilities, and smooth integration with development environments. It offers testing granularity and coverage. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is known for advanced security features, identifying vulnerabilities, and providing specialized tools for security testing.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users suggest simplifying the setup process, enhancing performance speed, and reducing resource intensity. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could benefit from improved reporting, user-friendliness, and better documentation for user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest presents challenges in deployment due to complexity and technical expertise requirements, though customer service is supportive in resolving issues. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional allows easier deployment but requires more proactive user support and guidance. Parasoft excels in customer service while PortSwigger wins in deployment ease.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is often considered expensive with mixed ROI perceptions, fitting larger enterprises needing specific API tests. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, although pricey, is perceived as offering high ROI through robust security features, justifying the investment for security-focused businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (22nd), API Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (23rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.1%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Anton Krivonosov

Application Security Architect at Kuehne & Nagel Inc.

A special tool for penetration testers or security specialists to conduct security assessments

We use the solution for security assessments. It's a special tool for penetration testers or security specialists PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a standard tool in the security industry. It's a stable solution that has many features. You can download different plugins if you don't have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"Technical support is helpful."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The product has a good learning hub."

"The feature that we have found most valuable is that it comes with pre-set configurations. They have a set of predefined options where you can pick one and start scanning. We also have the option of creating our own configurations, like how often do the applications need to be scanned."

"You can scan any number of applications and it updates its database."

"It offers flexibility, macros, and features to reduce the effort required for authenticated sessions."

"You can download different plugins if you don't have them in the standard edition."

"The initial setup is simple."

"I personally love its capability to automatically and accurately detect vulnerabilities. So, I would say it is the Burp scanner that is THE most powerful, valuable, and an awesome feature."

"The active scanner, which does an automated search of any web vulnerabilities."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"The performance could be a bit better."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"One area that can be improved, when compared to alternative tools, is that they could provide different reporting options and in different formats like PDF or something like that."

"You can have many false positives in Burp Suite. It depends on the scale of the penetration testing."

"I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions."

"Sometimes the solution can run a little slow."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The tool is very expensive."

"The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired."

"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"This is a value for money product."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition."

"We are using the community version, which is free."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is expensive compared to other tools."

"At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool."

"There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The pricing for Burp Suite Professional is not very high, however, it could be more flexible for clients.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 25% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 19% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 9% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 9% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 18% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

November 2024

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

November 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

Burp

Learn More

Parasoft

PortSwigger

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

December 2024

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.