Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pentera vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Pentera
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (12th), Penetration Testing Services (1st)
Tenable One Exposure Manage...
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of Pentera is 27.8%, up from 25.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is 1.9%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Marlow - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 18, 2024
Provides good features and helps monitor the status of ransomware protection in an organization
We used the solution for password strength assessments, ransomware testing, and automated penetration testing The tool helped us discover that we were using an outdated network protocol, NTLM. The password strength assessments feature was valuable. The testing features are fantastic. The tool…
Wanderley Viana - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 23, 2023
A highly scalable and reasonably priced solution that provides insight into user activities
I use the product for control and visibility of all the user activities. I check if we have any vulnerabilities in the data. Mostly, I check if a privileged user is doing something wrong The product gives me visibility into user activities. They provided me with enough information to create a use…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is SaaS-based. From a cloud perspective, it has Pentera Surface and Pentera Core. The Core is the on-prem deployed solution, while the Surface is the cloud-hosted solution that scans your public infrastructure. From the Surface perspective, the most valuable feature so far has been the attack surface mapping."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"The tool showed us that our ransomware protection wasn’t working on some machines."
"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"The product is easy to use."
"The platform's most valuable features are credential management and vulnerability management."
"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The product gives us a lot of insight."
"For me, the setup has been an easy process."
 

Cons

"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
"One of the big issues we have is that the tool has an additional license for compromised credentials. Suppose compromised credentials for any of your domains appear in leaks, dumps, or are being sold. In that case, they try to aggregate that data and highlight that, for example, ten users appeared in recent dumps as compromised credentials. However, they don't provide much information about where those compromises came from or their source information, probably to protect their sources."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring."
"The automated penetration testing features must be improved."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"The price could be improved."
"Tenable needs to provide a better way to manage private clouds."
"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."
"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."
"It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."
"The product's cost is reasonable. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."
"The tool is relatively cheap."
"The pricing is fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pentera?
What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.
What needs improvement with Pentera?
One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring.
What is your primary use case for Pentera?
Our customers use the product to validate their security environment, ensuring that vulnerabilities within the network are identified and addressed.
What do you like most about Tenable.ep?
The product gives us a lot of insight.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.ep?
It's very expensive. I would give it an eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with Tenable.ep?
Tenable has to improve its cloud solution. They're only supporting AWS and Azure. Tenable partially supports Google Cloud but not fully. Tenable needs to give private cloud also. So, Tenable needs ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.ep
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera vs. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.