ProcessMaker vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

ProcessMaker and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. ProcessMaker is ranked #38, while SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.6. ProcessMaker holds a 0.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ProcessMaker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

493 Views
391 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

7,093 Views
4,658 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

SAP Signavio Process Manager and ProcessMaker compete in process management solutions. SAP Signavio may have the upper hand in supporting complex enterprises, while ProcessMaker is favored for its usability and cost-effectiveness.

Features: SAP Signavio Process Manager provides process modeling, workflow documentation, and optimization tools. ProcessMaker offers BPMN modeling, a low-code environment, and intuitive design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Signavio requires intricate deployment suited for large organizations with IT resources. ProcessMaker's cloud-based model allows quicker deployments for smaller teams. SAP Signavio offers comprehensive customer service with extensive onboarding, while ProcessMaker provides accessible support.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Signavio has higher setup costs, potentially extending ROI timelines. ProcessMaker's lower initial investment and direct deployment access can result in quicker ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

38th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.6%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"All in all, Signavio usability is excellent. Anyone can learn to use the tool quickly. This increases acceptance as employees are not facing a high learning curve. With the offered usability it is easy to model processes also live in workshops."

"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."

"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."

"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."

"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The collaboration hub is good because it allows us to share the models that we've captured and to get comments back, and we don't all have to be in the same room, it can be remote and over time."

"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"The user management functionality in Process Manager is not as user friendly as the one in the Collaboration Hub."

"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."

"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."

"The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The collaboration and commenting are great. However, I think it would be more useful for people to get notifications of comments straight-away so we can react even quicker to them than we already can."

"It's very user-orientated, which is why I gave it a high rating, even if it is not perfect in every corner."

"There is a lot of room for improvement. We've submitted a lot of OSS requests for special inputs we need, like glossary or dictionary entries in Quick Model. Currently, that's not functional."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 63% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 17% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 10% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 29% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

March 2025

Download ProcessMaker product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Free Report: ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.