Quest SharePlex vs Toad Data Modeler comparison

The compared Quest SharePlex and Toad Data Modeler solutions aren't in the same category. Quest SharePlex is ranked #50 in DI , and holds a 0.7% mindshare in the category. Toad Data Modeler is ranked #11 in DDM , with an average rating of 9.3, and holds a 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest SharePlex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Toad Data Modeler users who would recommend it.

Quest SharePlex

Read 5 Quest SharePlex reviews

1,486 Views
881 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Toad Data Modeler

Read 19 Toad Data Modeler reviews

525 Views
282 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Quest SharePlex

Toad Data Modeler

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Quest SharePlex and Toad Data Modeler both cater to the database management ecosystem, with SharePlex being superior in data replication efficiency and Toad Data Modeler excelling in database design.

Features: Quest SharePlex offers data replication ensuring minimal downtime and high availability, allows seamless database migrations, and efficiently handles real-time data replication across multiple sources and targets. Toad Data Modeler provides comprehensive database design tools, supports various database platforms, and features detailed diagramming functionalities for schema visualization.

Room for Improvement: Quest SharePlex can benefit from enhancements in user interface simplicity, broader documentation for user support, and expanded compatibility with additional database platforms. Toad Data Modeler could improve its real-time collaboration features, further optimize performance for large-scale databases, and provide more in-depth integration options with other database management tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest SharePlex is known for straightforward deployment and robust customer support aligning with immediate operational needs. Toad Data Modeler offers a simple setup and design-centric support focusing on developers and architects' needs.

Pricing and ROI: Quest SharePlex requires a substantial initial investment with promising ROI from enhanced reliability and reduced downtime. Toad Data Modeler, with a more affordable initial cost, offers significant ROI where database optimization and management are priorities.

To learn more, read our detailed Quest SharePlex vs. Toad Data Modeler Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex vs. Toad Data Modeler

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,302 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Quest SharePlex

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (50th)

Toad Data Modeler

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (11th)

Mindshare comparison

Quest SharePlex and Toad Data Modeler aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Quest SharePlex is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, down 0.8% compared to last year.
Toad Data Modeler, on the other hand, focuses on Database Development and Management, holds 3.6% mindshare, up 1.8% since last year.

Data Integration

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

ManishJain7

Architect, Database Administration at Maximus

Excellent replication with good stability and very helpful support

I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training. Also, maybe if we could have a seperate section of showing out-of-sync tables in Foglight, instead of looking into the "warning" messages.

Read full review

JamesBlack

Owner at JRB Software

A scalable and stable product that is easy to deploy and provides excellent features

The Oracle side of things was very popular. The admin features for Oracle were great. It would be a really good thing if we had a similar functionality to SQL Server. The product is not too bad with maintenance. MySQL would be better than Toad. I always recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"The feature I really like is the graphical part, especially the control of the relationships."

"I found all features valuable and necessary in Toad Data Modeler, particularly how good the solution is for modeling, database schema generation, and database re-engineering. I also found Toad Data Modeler straightforward to use."

"It is not feasible for small businesses. It is not used in a small company."

"Auto-complete is the best feature of the solution."

Cons

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"The product should provide better debugging features."

"Many users don't know how to add licensing to Toad, or where it is shown, so they could make that easier."

"When updating a model after generating a schema, if only a few tables are imported, the tool assumes you want to delete the rest, which is cumbersome."

"What could be improved in Toad Data Modeler is stability and the complex setup."

"It is not feasible for small businesses. It is not used in a small company."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"Though I'm not involved in the licensing for Toad Data Modeler, I believe it's per user and not cheap."

"Price-wise, the lesser it is, the better it is for me, especially in Egypt. I think that the licensing cost ranges from 1,000 to 9,000. Also, it includes maintenance and support for a year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,302 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Healthcare Company

Government

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Toad Data Modeler?

Auto-complete is the best feature of the solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad Data Modeler?

Considering its functionality, I would rate its pricing as a seven out of ten. It could be cheaper yet is still pretty good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad Data Modeler?

1) When updating a model after generating a schema, if only a few tables are imported, the tool assumes you want to delete the rest. If you have a large model, you repeatedly have to clarify that y...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 64% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 8% of the time

Fivetran vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

More Quest SharePlex Competitors

Oracle SQL Developer vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 38% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 25% of the time

Toad for Oracle vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 25% of the time

Aqua Data Studio vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 13% of the time

More Toad Data Modeler Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex

February 2025

Download Quest SharePlex product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

March 2025

Download Toad Data Modeler product report

Also Known As

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Toad

Overview

SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

Quest Software

Toad Data Modeler helps you create high-quality data models. This data modeling tool enables you to easily deploy accurate changes to data structures across more than 20 different platforms.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Zions Bancorporation

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex vs. Toad Data Modeler

January 2025

Free Report: Quest SharePlex vs. Toad Data Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about Quest SharePlex vs. Toad Data Modeler and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,302 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Quest SharePlex vs. Toad Data Modeler report.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.