Rapid7 AppSpider vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Rapid7 and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Rapid7 is ranked #32, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Rapid7 holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 19.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

1,341 Views
711 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 117 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

38,362 Views
28,004 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

SonarQube Server and Rapid7 AppSpider compete in software quality and security analysis. Based on user reviews, SonarQube has an advantage in code quality features, while AppSpider is stronger in vulnerability scanning.

Features: SonarQube supports over 20 programming languages and allows custom coding rules, pre-commit checks, and strong CI/CD integration, making it useful for holistic code quality assessment. Rapid7 AppSpider is known for its detailed vulnerability reporting and web security with comprehensive international standards compliance, providing a valuable tool for compliance and risk management.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube users suggest enhancements in analysis speed, multi-language project configuration, and improved security scanning capabilities. Users feel better integration with tools like JIRA and more efficient plugins could be beneficial. For Rapid7 AppSpider, users report false positives and express the need for improved integration and stability. Mobile application scanning and more understandable reports are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers flexible deployment options including hybrid and on-premise environments, although official support is mainly for paid versions. It benefits from active community support. Rapid7 AppSpider can be deployed in both cloud and on-premise environments, but users note slower response times for support queries and integration setups.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube offers an open-source version with commercial plugins available for additional capabilities. While professional and enterprise editions incur costs, their comprehensive features contribute to perceived ROI. Rapid7 AppSpider requires a purchased license, which can be costly at an enterprise level, but it provides effective ROI for its web security scanning and vulnerability reporting features.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,655 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

117

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 19.7%, down from 27.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)	19.7%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.5%
Other	79.8%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rizwan-Alam

Head Information Security at Akhtar Fuiou Technologies

Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable

One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.

Read full review

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which is compliant with international standards."

"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues."

"The entire solution is interactive and has a point-and-click user experience, which makes it easy to find items or drill down on information. You don't need specialized skills to use the product."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

"It provides the security that is required from a solution for financial businesses."

"The product itself has a friendly UI."

"The product has a friendly UI that is easy to use and understand."

"There are many options and examples available in the tool that help us fix the issues it shows us."

"It has very good scalability and stability."

"The most valuable features are the dashboard reports and the ease of integrating it with Jenkins."

"We have worked with the support from SonarQube and we have had good experiences."

"The SonarQube dashboard looks great."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"Integration could be better."

"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."

"The dashboard and interface are crucial and they need some improvement."

"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

"I find it is light on the security side."

"We could use some team support, but since we are using the community version, it's not available."

"The product's user documentation can be vastly improved."

"We called support and complained but have not received any information as we use the free version. We had to fix it on our own and could not escalate it to the tool's developer."

"In terms of what can be improved, the areas that need more attention in the solution are its architecture and development."

"We're in the process of figuring out how to automate the workflow for QA audit controls on it. I think that's perhaps an area that we could use some buffing. We're a Kubernetes shop, so there are some things that aren't direct fits, which we're struggling with on the component Docker side. But nothing major."

"The tool needs to be more compatible with C/C++ language"

"The reporting can be improved."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is pretty fair."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

"SonarQube is a cost-effective solution."

"On the pricing side, it's 3,000 Euros for 1 million lines of code."

"The solution is cheaper than other products."

"The licence is standard open source licensing"

"It's an open-source product."

"The beauty of this solution is the free open-source version is capable enough in doing pretty much what an enterprise-level version can do."

"We are using the Community edition of SonarQube."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 31% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 9% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 22% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 5% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

October 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

October 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

AppSpider

Sonar

Overview

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Sample Customers

Microsoft

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

September 2025

Free Report: Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.